Defining Sampling Districts for Household Travel Surveys

Abstract

The character of land development affects the trip-making behavior of residents. The case is made for the careful demarcation of survey sampling districts from which to collect household travel data for forecasting travel demand. Household travel survey data from the Baltimore, Maryland, metropolitan area indicate that trip generation rates derived from areas with similar intensities of land development are more consistent than those derived according to political jurisdictions. Additional data from the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area support this hypothesis. In light of current and previous findings, trip rates for metropolitan areas clearly should be derived from and applied to areas of homogeneous character in recognition of the effects of density and mixture of land uses on trip making. This assertion is illustrated with empirical data from the Baltimore metropolitan area. Conceptually, area type is more appealing than demarcations by political jurisdictions. Results of visual plots and numerical analyses show distinctive differences between the density classes but not as much between jurisdictions. A comparison of these results indicates that area type is the more superior form of stratification. Defining area type by density can reasonably capture future changes in land-use and activity patterns. The refinement suggested for the demarcation of sampling districts in the conduct of travel surveys is widely applicable to metropolitan areas around the country.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cervero

Mixed Land Uses and Commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research A, Vol. 30, No. 5 1996, pp. 361–377.

Cervero

and Radisch

. Travel Choices in Pedestrian versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3 1996, pp. 127–141.

Friedman

Gordon

S. P.

and Peers

J. B.

. Effect of Neotraditional Neighborhood Design on Travel Characteristics. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 63–70.

Cervero

and Gorham

. Commuting in Transit versus Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61, No. 2 1995, pp. 210–225.

Frank

L. D.

and Pivo

. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, Walking. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 44–52.

Kitamura

Mokhtarian

P. L.

and Laidet

. A Micro Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 2 1997, pp. 125–158.

McNally

How Neighborhood Design Affects Travel. ITS Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, Nov. 1995–Feb. 1996, pp. 2, 3, and 6.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Summary File 1. factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=DEC&_submenuId=datasets_1&_lang=en.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1. factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=DEC&_submenuId=datasets_1&_lang=en.