Elastic Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of a Flexible Pavement Subjected to Varying Falling Weight Deflectometer Loads

Abstract

A nonlinear finite element method (FEM) model has been developed to model thin-surfaced, unbound granular pavements. The FEM model incorporates a nonlinear anisotropic material model for the granular material and a nonlinear material model for the subgrade. The coefficients for the material models were determined from laboratory repeated load triaxial tests. A test pavement at the Canterbury Accelerated Pavement Testing Indoor Facility (CAPTIF) was instrumented with an inductive coil soil strain system to measure vertical compressive strains and pressure cells to measure the vertical compressive stresses. The test pavement was subjected to loading by a falling weight deflectometer (FWD) device at four different load levels. The initial FEM model configuration was undertaken at one load level using the surface deflection measurements from the FWD; however, there were significant differences between the computed and measured stress and strain values. The scalar coefficients for the granular and subgrade materials were adjusted so that the measured and computed stress and strain values matched within a reasonable tolerance (10%). After the calibration process was finished, it was found that the computed and measured surface deflections also matched. The model was rerun with the three remaining load cases; the computed and measured stress, strain, and surface deflection values were in close agreement. The range of computed stiffness values varied with both the pavement and load level. The results from this analysis showed the need to use a full nonlinear model to obtain realistic results when FWD data are modeled.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Duncan

J. M.

Monismith

C. L.

and Wilson

E. L.

. Finite Element Analyses of Pavements. In Highway Research Record 228, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1968, pp. 18–33.

Raad

and Figueroa

J. L.

. Load Response of Transportation Support Systems. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 106, No. 1 1980, pp. 111–128.

Tutumluer

and Thompson

M. R.

. Anisotropic Modeling of Granular Bases in Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1577, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 18–26.

Uzan

Advanced Backcalculation Techniques. In Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli (Second Volume). ASTM Special Technical Publication 1198. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1994, pp. 3–37.

Steven

B. D.

The Development and Verification of a Pavement Response and Performance Model for Unbound Granular Pavements. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2005.

Stewart

H. E.

Selig

E. T.

and Norman-Gregory

G. M.

. Failure Criteria and Lateral Stresses in Track Foundations. In Transportation Research Record 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 59–64.

Selig

E. T.

Tensile Zone Effects on Performance of Layered Systems. Geotechnique, Vol. 37, No. 3 1987, pp. 247–254.

Heath

A. C.

Pestana

J. M.

Harvey

J. T.

and Bejerano

M. O.

. Normalizing Behavior of Unsaturated Granular Pavement Materials. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 9 2004, pp. 896–904.

Thom

N. H.

and Brown

S. F.

. Effect of Moisture on the Structural Performance of a Crushed-Limestone Road Base. In Transportation Research Record 1121, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 50–56.

10.

Shackel

Repeated Loading of Soils—A Review. Australian Road Research, Vol. 5, No. 3 1973, pp. 22–49.

11.

Andrei

Witczak

M. W.

Schwartz

C. W.

and Uzan

. Harmonized Resilient Modulus Test Method for Unbound Pavement Materials. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1874, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 29–37.

12.

Desai

C. S.

and Christian

J. T.

. Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.

13.

Standards Australia International Limited. AS 1289.6.8.1–1995: Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes—Soil Strength and Consolidation Tests—Determination of the Resilient Modulus and Permanent Deformation of Granular Unbound Pavement Materials. Standards Australia International, Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia, 1995.

14.

Pidwerbesky

B. D.

Accelerated Dynamic Loading of Flexible Pavements at the Canterbury Accelerated Pavement Testing Indoor Facility. In Transportation Research Record 1482, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 79–86.

15.

ABAQUS Inc. ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual (v6.5). Providence, R.I., 2004.

16.

Alabaster

D. J.

de Pont

and Steven

B. D.

. The Fourth Power Law and Thin Surfaced Flexible Pavements. In Proc., 9th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.

17.

Dawson

A. R.

The e-mu System, Users Manual. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1994.

18.

Tutumluer

and Barksdale

R. D.

. Behaviour of Pavements with Granular Bases—Prediction and Performance. UNBAR4. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1995.

19.

Tutumluer

Little

D. N.

and Kim

S.-H.

. Validated Model for Predicting Field Performance of Aggregate Base Courses. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1837, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 41–49.

20.

Al-Khoury

Parameter Identification Technique for Layered Systems. PhD thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Technology of Delft, Netherlands, 2002.