Functioning and Acceptance of Overtaking Assistant Design Tested in Driving Simulator Experiment

Abstract

This paper describes a driving simulator experiment to test the functioning and acceptance of a standardized overtaking assistant design. On a simulated two-lane road, 24 participants drove 15 min with and without a prototype overtaking assistant. The overtaking assistant calculated the available time to perform an overtaking maneuver, taking the preceding vehicle and opposing traffic into account. When it was safe to overtake, the assistant showed a green sign to participants; when it was not safe, a red sign was shown. The number of overtaking maneuvers performed in the base scenario (without assistance) did not vary significantly from that in the assistant scenario. Male participants, however, did overtake significantly more than female participants. The reported activation level of all participants had grown significantly after the run with the overtaking assistant, compared with a similar run without assistance. Participants’ ratings for the usefulness of the assistant and on how satisfying it was were both low; some participants thought the assistant was too careful (shows a red sign while it is safe to overtake), and others thought it was not careful enough (shows a green sign while it is not safe to overtake). The overtaking frequency of participants was not significantly related to sensation-seeking scores, which are highly related to risky driving. It was concluded that according to the performance of the overtaking maneuvers, it is possible to design a standardized overtaking assistant. However, it should be possible to improve the system to suit the different drivers’ perceptions better.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Project Community Road Accident Database. CARE. 1993–2003. pp. 63–65. ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety/road_safety_observatory/care_en.htm.

Road Safety. Impact of New Technologies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2003.

SWOV (Institute for Road Safety Research of the Netherlands). Accident database. 2003. www.swov.nl/cognos/cgi-bin/ppdscgi.exe?toc=%2FNederlands%2FOngevallen,%20bestuurders%20en%20slachtoffers. Accessed July 14, 2004.

Lee

S. E.

Olsen

E. C. B.

and Wierwille

W. W.

. A Comprehensive Examination of Naturalistic Lane-Changes. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Hegeman

Brookhuis

and Hoogendoorn

. Opportunities of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Towards Overtaking. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 5, No. 4 2005, pp. 1–16.

Houtenbos

Hegeman

and Driel

C. V.

. Determining Opportunities for Overtaking Assistance. Combined Efforts of a User Needs Survey and an Interaction Model. Intelligent Transport Systems, 2005.

Critical Analysis of ADAS/AVG Options to 2020, Selection of Options to Be Investigated. University of Southampton, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, and Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.

Khoury

J. E.

and Hobeika

. Simulation of a Crash Prevention Technology at No-Passing Zone Sites. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Hegeman

Brookhuis

and Hoogendoorn

. Observing Overtaking Manoeuvres to Design An Overtaking Assistance System. Presented at 12th World Congress of Intelligent Transportations Systems, San Francisco, Calif., 2005.

10.

Kappe

Winsum

W.V.

and Wolffelaar

. A Cost-Effective Driving Simulator. Presented at Driving Simulator Conference, Paris, 2002.

11.

Zijlstra

F. R. H.

Efficiency in Work Behaviour: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 1993, p. 177.

12.

Bartenwerfer

Einige praktische Konsequenzen aus der Aktivierungstheorie. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, Vol. 16, 1969, pp. 195–222.

13.

Jonah

B. A.

Sensation Seeking and Risky Driving: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1997, p. 651.

14.

Hegeman

Overtaking Frequency on Two-Lane Rural Roads. Safety Possibilities of ADAS. Presented at the TRAIL Congress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2004.

15.

Brookhuis

and de Waard

. Limiting Speed, Towards An Intelligent Speed Adapter (ISA). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 2, No. 2 1999, pp. 81–90.

16.

Van Der Laan

J. D.

Heino

and De Waard

. A Simple Procedure for the Assessment of Acceptance of Advanced Transport Telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, p. 1.

17.

De Waard

van der Hulst

Hoedemaeker

and Brookhuis

K. A.

. Driver Behavior in an Emergency Situation in the Automated Highway System. Transportation Human Factors, Vol. 1, No. 1 1999, pp. 67–82.

18.

Benedetto

and Blasis

M. R.

. Reliability of Standards for Safe Overtaking: Advances Using Real-Time Interactive Simulation in Virtual Reality. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

19.

Jenkins

J. M.

and Rilett

L. R.

. Classifying Passing Maneuvers: A Behavioural Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1937, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 14–21.

20.

Gray

and Regan

. Risky Driving Behavior: A Consequence of Motion Adaptation for Visually Guided Motor Action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 26, No. 6 2000, pp. 1721–1732.