Adding Graphics to Dynamic Message Sign Messages

Abstract

A human factors study assessed the effects of adding graphics to dynamic message sign (DMS) messages. Two approaches employed in the assessment—a questionnaire survey and a video-based driving simulation experiment—are reported here along with the findings. The questionnaire surveyed drivers’ preferences concerning the addition of graphics to a text message, the color of the message, alternative graphic images, placement of the graphic image, image contrast, flashing, and the framing of graphic images. One hundred and twenty-seven subjects from Rhode Island participated in the survey. Statistical analysis of survey results showed strong preference for graphic-aided messages over text-only messages; amber-color messages over green- and red-color messages; and messages with graphic on the left side over others. The analysis also identified specific graphics to accompany certain text messages. Based on the survey results, a video-based driving simulation experiment was designed to test drivers’ responses to selected DMS messages surveyed in the questionnaire. Forty-eight subjects from different age groups with different native language backgrounds took part in the experiment. Results of the experiment showed that graphic-aided messages displayed in amber or green were responded to significantly faster than other settings. Older drivers’ responses were slower and less accurate than others; however, their responses improved significantly when the DMS messages were enhanced by graphics. It was also found that graphic-aided DMS messages helped improve the responses of non-native-English-speaking drivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Staplin

Lococo

Byington

and Harkey

. Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Publication FHWA-RD-01-103. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.

Dudek

C. L.

and Ullman

G. L.

. Variable Message Sign Operations Manual. Publication FHWA-NJ-2001-10. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2001.

Dudek

C. L.

and Ullman

G. L.

. Flashing Messages, Flashing Lines, and Alternating One Line on Changeable Message Signs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1803, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 94–101.

Wang

J.-H.

and Cao

. Assessing Message Display Formats of Portable Variable Message Signs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 1937, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 113–119.

Wang

J.-H.

Yang

C. M.

and Waters

. Effects of Message Display on Motorists Comprehension of and Response to Arterial Dynamic Message Signs. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Emmerink

Nijkamp

Rietveld

and Van Ommeren

J. N.

. Variable Message Signs and Radio Traffic Information: An Integrated Empirical Analysis of Drivers’ Route Choice Behaviour. Transportation Research A, Vol. 30, No. 2 1996, pp. 135–153.

Wardman

Bonsall

P. W.

and Shires

J. D.

. Motorist Response to Variable Message Signs: A Stated Preference Investigation. Transportation Research C, Vol. 5, No. 6 1997, pp. 389–405.

Nsour

S. A.

IVHS and the Elderly Driving. Proc., Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety in the 21st Century: Challenges, Innovations, and Opportunities Conference, ASCE, Chicago, Ill., 1997, pp. 333–339.

10.

Dewar

Kline

Scheiber

and Swanson

. Symbol Signing Design for Older Drivers. Publication FHWA-RD-94-069. FHWA, McLean, Va., 1997.

11.

Colomb

Hubert

Carta

and Bry

. Variable-Message Signs Symbol Legibility and Recognition. Proc., Conference Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Gothenburg, Sweden, September 18–20, 1991, pp. 46–62.

12.

Tsavachidis

and Keller

. Graphical Traffic Information on Dynamic Information Boards. Proc., European Transport Conference, Cambridge, England, 2000, pp. 201–215.

13.

Alkim

T. P.

Van Der Mede

P. H. J.

and Janssen

W. H.

. Graphical Route Information on Variable Message Signs. Proc., 10th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, April 4 –6, 2000.

14.

Kolich

Driving Simulator Validation Study. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 2004.

15.

Fildes

Godley

Triggs

and Jarvis

. Perceptual Countermeasures: Simulator Validation Study. Report No. CR 169. Federal Office of Road Safety, Roads and Traffic Authority, Canberra, Australia, 1997.