A new multivariate approach is introduced for jointly modeling data on crash counts by severity on the basis of multivariate Poisson-lognormal models. Although the data on crash frequency by severity are multivariate in nature, they have often been analyzed by modeling each severity level separately, without taking into account correlations that exist among different severity levels. The new multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression approach can cope with both overdispersion and a fully general correlation structure in the data, as opposed to the recently suggested multivariate Poisson regression approach, which allows for neither overdispersion nor a general correlation structure in the data. The new method is applied to the multivariate crash counts obtained from intersections in California for 10 years. The results show promise toward the goal of obtaining more accurate estimates by accounting for correlations in the multivariate crash counts and overdispersion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbessC., JarettD., and WrightC. C.Accidents at Blackspots: Estimating the Effectiveness of Remedial Treatment, with Special Reference to the “Regression-to-Mean” Effect. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1981, pp. 535–542.
2.
HauerE., NgJ. C. N., and LovellJ.Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–61.
3.
PersaudB. N., and DzbikL.Accident Prediction Models for Freeways. In Transportation Research Record 1401, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 55–60.
4.
KulmalaR.Safety at Rural Three- and Four-Arm Junctions: Development and Applications of Accident Prediction Models. VTT Publications 233. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 1995.
5.
PochM., and ManneringF. L.Negative Binomial Analysis of Intersection-Accident Frequencies. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 2, 1996, pp. 105–113.
6.
LordD.The Prediction of Accidents on Digital Networks: Characteristics and Issues Related to the Application of Accident Prediction Models. PhD dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2000.
7.
IvanJ. N., WangC., and BernardoN. R.Explaining Two-Lane Highway Crash Rates Using Land Use and Hourly Exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000, pp. 787–795.
8.
LyonC., OhJ., PersaudB. N., WashingtonS. P., and BaredJ.Empirical Investigation of the IHSDM Accident Prediction Algorithm for Rural Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 78–86.
9.
MiaouS.-P., and LordD.Modeling Traffic Crash-Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Functional Form, and Bayes Versus Empirical Bayes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 31–40.
10.
OhJ., LyonC., WashingtonS. P., PersaudB. N., and BaredJ.Validation of the FHWA Crash Models for Rural Intersections: Lessons Learned. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 41–49.
11.
LordD., ManarA., and VizioliA.Modeling Crash–Flow–Density and Crash–Flow–V/C Ratio for Rural and Urban Freeway Segments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 185–199.
12.
MiaouS.-P., and SongJ. J.Bayesian Ranking of Sites for Engineering Safety Improvements: Decision Parameter, Treatability Concept, Statistical Criterion and Spatial Dependence. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005, pp. 699–720.
13.
TunaruR.Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Multiple Count Data. Austrian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 31, Nos. 2 and 3, 2002, pp. 221–229.
14.
BijleveldF. D.The Covariance Between the Number of Accidents and the Number of Victims in Multivariate Analysis of Accident Related Outcomes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005, pp. 591–600.
15.
SongJ. J., GhoshM., MiaouS., and MallickB.Bayesian Multivariate Spatial Models for Roadway Traffic Crash Mapping. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Vol. 97, 2006, pp. 246–273.
16.
MaJ., and KockelmanK. M.Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Regression for Models of Injury Count by Severity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1950, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 24–34.
17.
TsionasE. G.Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Regression. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2001, pp. 243–255.
18.
KarlisD., and MeligkotsidouL.Multivariate Poisson Regression with Covariance Structure. Statistics and Computing, Vol. 15, 2005, pp. 255–265.
19.
ChibS., and WinkelmannR.Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis of Correlated Count Data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 19, 2001, pp. 428–435.
20.
WinkelmanR.Econometric Analysis of Count Data, 4th ed. Springer, New York, 2003.
21.
TierneyL.Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions. Annals of Statistics, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1994, pp. 1701–1762.
22.
GilksW. R., RichardsonS., and SpiegelhalterD. J.Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice.Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.
23.
LiuJ. S.Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing.Springer, New York, 2001.
AndersonT. W.An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1984.
26.
ChibS., and GreenbergE.Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. American Statistician, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1995, pp. 327–335.
27.
SAS: Version 9 of the SAS System for Windows.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., 2002.
28.
SchluterP. J., DeelyJ. J., and NicholsonA. J.Ranking and Selecting Motor Vehicle Accident Sites by Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model. The Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1997, pp. 293–316.
29.
MiaouS.-P., BlighR. P., and LordD.Developing Median Barrier Installation Guidelines: A Benefit/Cost Analysis Using Texas Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1904, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 3–19.
30.
LordD.Modeling Motor Vehicle Crashes Using Poisson-Gamma Models: Examining the Effects of Low Sample Mean Values and Small Sample Size on the Estimation of the Fixed Dispersion Parameter. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 751–766.
31.
LordD., and Miranda-MorenoL. F.Effects of Low Sample Mean Values and Small Sample Size on Estimation of Fixed Dispersion Parameter of Poisson-Gamma Models for Modeling Motor Vehicle Crashes: Bayesian Perspective. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
