For longitudinal barriers, it is common practice to use a standard W-beam guardrail along the required highway segments and to use a stiffened thrie-beam guardrail in a transition region near the end of a bridge. As a result of the differences in rail geometries, a W-beam-to-thrie-beam transition element is typically used to connect and provide continuity between the two rail sections. However, the W-beam-to-thrie-beam transition element has not been evaluated according to current impact safety standards. Therefore, an approach guardrail transition system, including a W-beam-to-thrie-beam transition element, was constructed and crash tested. The transition system was attached to Missouri's thrie-beam and channel bridge railing system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MakK. K., and MengesW. L.Testing and Evaluation of the W-Beam Transition (on Steel Posts with Timber Blockouts) to the Vertical Flared Back Concrete Bridge Parapet. Report FHWA-RD-96-200. Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University, College Station, 1997.
2.
PolivkaK. A., FallerR. K., SickingD. L., ReidJ. D., RohdeJ. R., and HollowayJ. C.Crash Testing of Missouri's W-Beam to Thrie Beam Transition Element. Final Report to the Midwest States Regional Pooled Fund Program. Transportation Research Report TRP-03-94-00, Project No. SPR-3(017)—Year 9. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Sept. 12, 2000.
3.
MichieJ. D.NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
4.
RossH. E.Jr., SickingD. L., ZimmerR. A., and MichieJ. D.NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
5.
PowellG. H.BARRIER VII: A Computer Program for the Evaluation of Automobile Barrier Systems. Report FHWA RD-73-51. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1973.
6.
PolivkaK. A., FallerR. K., SickingD. L., RohdeJ. R., ReidJ. D., and HollowayJ. C.Guardrail and Guardrail Terminals Installed Over Curbs—Phase II. Final Report to the Midwest States Regional Pooled Fund Program. Transportation Research Report TRP-03-105-00, Project No. SPR-3(017)-Year 10. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nov. 5, 2001.
7.
PolivkaK. A., FallerR. K., SickingD. L., ReidJ. D., RohdeJ. R., HollowayJ. C., BielenbergR. W., and KuipersB. D.Development of the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) for Standard and Reduced Post Spacing and in Combination with Curbs. Final Report to the Midwest States Regional Pooled Fund Program. Transportation Research Report TRP-03-139-04, Project No. SPR-3(017)—Years 10, 12, and 13, Project Codes RPFP-00-02, 02-01, and 03-05. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Sept. 1, 2004.
8.
SickingD. L., ReidJ. D., and RohdeJ. R.Development of the Midwest Guardrail System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1797, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 44–52.
9.
FallerR. K., PolivkaK. A., KuipersB. D., BielenbergR. W., ReidJ. D., RohdeJ. R., and SickingD. L.Midwest Guardrail System for Standard and Special Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1890, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 19–33.
10.
FallerR. K., SickingD. L., BielenbergR. W., RohdeJ. R., PolivkaK. A., and ReidJ. D.Performance of Steel-Post, W-Beam Guardrail Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2025, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 18–33.
