Abstract
Hot-mix asphalt (HMA) density is an important acceptance quality characteristic, which involves in situ tests for quality control and assurance (QC/QA). Highway agencies have conventionally used nuclear density gauges or core samples for mat density. More recently, alternate nondestructive testing methods have been considered to replace current test methods. Nonnuclear density gauges offer rapid testing while eliminating safety risks and costs associated with radioactive license. Although agencies have evaluated them, they are not implemented in acceptance testing so far. Results are presented from a field evaluation of three nonnuclear density gauges—PaveTracker, PQI 300, and PQI 301—conducted on Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) paving projects. The main goal was to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of non-nuclear gauges for use in QC/QA activities by WisDOT. The study involved field tests at 16 project sites and included 21 mix designs and a variety of mix design and pavement design parameters, such as aggregate type, nominal maximum aggregate size, layer thickness, design traffic, and base type. Density measurements were recorded at 30 test points at each site with one nuclear gauge and three nonnuclear gauges. Although the mean standard deviation values of the nonnuclear gauge data were less than those of the nuclear gauge measurements, a consistent bias was observed between the two data sets. This bias was adjusted by using a calibration factor to yield density predictions statistically the same as the nuclear gauge measurements. It is recommended that a calibration factor determined from 10 points by using a slope function be implemented for agency use. Further, daily calibration for each mix design is recommended when the project involves multiple paving days.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.