Assessment of I-4 Contraflow Plans

Abstract

Better use of the available road network is critical to improving the evacuation operation during a disaster. Contraflow operations help increase the capacity of the available network by reversing the direction of inbound lanes to outbound lanes. This helps improve the outflow from a region threatened by disaster. One of the major issues associated with contraflow operations is determining the locations for access to the contraflow lanes from the normal-flow lanes. These accesses are also referred to as crossovers. Four different strategies with different crossover locations were tested on the I-4 evacuation route from Tampa to Orlando, Florida. It was found that the provision of two crossovers, one after Tampa and another after Plant City, performed the best but was only marginally better than the provision of one crossover after Tampa. Therefore, considering the cost and personnel needed to provide a crossover, the provision of one crossover after Tampa was found to be a more logical choice than the provision of two crossovers. It was observed that the time required to run the microscopic simulation to arrive at the results was extremely long. To overcome this drawback, the cell transmission model (CTM) was calibrated and run for the same four strategies. It was observed that the results were extremely close to the results from the microscopic simulation. The robustness and speed of CTM make it ideal for use as part of a decision support system to help determine the best strategies in real time. This will help emergency management officials make real-time decisions in the event of unforeseen drops in capacities because of incidents or vehicle breakdowns.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wolshon

One-Way-Out: Contraflow Freeway Operation for Hurricane Evacuation. National Hazards Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2001, pp. 102–112.

Wolshon

, and Urbina

National Review of Hurricane Evacuation Plans and Policies: A Comparison and Contrast of State Practices. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2003, pp. 257–275.

Tuydes

, and Ziliaskopoulos

Network Redesign to Optimize Evacuation Contraflow. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Theodoulou

Contraflow Evacuation on Westbound I-10 out of the City of New Orleans. MS thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2003.

Wolshon

, and Theodoulou

Modeling and Analyses of Freeway Contraflow to Improve Future Evacuations. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Baker

Hurricane Evacuation Behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1991, pp. 287–310.

Baker

E. J.

Hurricane Evacuations in the United States. In Storms, Vol. 1, Routledge Hazards and Disasters Series, Routledge, New York, 2000, pp. 306–319.

Analysis of Florida's One-Way Operations for Hurricane Evacuation. Compendium of Route-by-Route Technical Memorandum. Post, Buckley, Schuh, & Jernigan, Inc., Tampa, Fla., 2000.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12/1238250.html. Accessed July 21, 2007.

10.

VISSIM. PTV America, Corvallis, Oregon. www.ptvamerica.com/vissim.html. Accessed July 21, 2007.

11.

Daganzo

The Cell Transmission Model: A Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with Hydrodynamic Theory. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1994, pp. 269–287.

12.

Daganzo

The Cell Transmission Model. Part II. Network Traffic. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1994, pp. 79–93.

13.

Chiu

Y. C.

, Villalobos

, Gautam

, and Zheng

Modeling and Solving the Optimal Evacuation Destination-Route-Flow-Staging Problem for No-Notice Extreme Events. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.

14.

Kalafatas

, and Peeta

An Exact Graph Structure for Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Formulation, Properties, and Computational Experience. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.