Calibration of Resistance Factors for Axially Loaded Concrete Piles Driven into Soft Soils

Abstract

The evaluation of axial load resistance of piles driven into soft Louisiana soils based on reliability theory is presented. Forty-two square precast, prestressed, concrete piles that were tested to failure were included in the investigation. The predictions of pile resistances were based on static analysis (α-method for clay and Nordlund method for sand) and three cone penetration test (CPT) direct methods: the Schmertmann, De Ruiter–Beringen, and Bustamante–Gianeselli methods. In addition, dynamic measurements with signal matching analysis of pile resistances using CAPWAP, which is based on the measured force and velocity signals obtained near the pile top during driving, were evaluated. The Davisson and modified Davisson interpretation methods were used to determine the measured ultimate load-carrying resistances from pile load tests. The predicted ultimate pile resistances obtained by using the different prediction methods were compared with the measured resistances determined from pile load tests. Statistical analyses were carried out to evaluate the capability of the prediction design methods to estimate the measured ultimate pile resistance of driven piles. The results showed that the static method overpredicted the pile resistance, whereas the dynamic measurement with signal matching analysis (CAPWAP end-of-driving and 14-day beginning-of-restrike) underpredicted the pile resistance. Of the three direct CPT methods, the De Ruiter–Beringen method was the most consistent prediction method with the lowest coefficient of variation. Reliability-based analyses, by using the first-order, second-moment method, also were conducted to calibrate the resistance factors (φ) for the investigated pile design methods. The resistance factors for different design methods were determined and compared with AASHTO recommendation values. The calibration showed that De Ruiter–Beringen method has a higher resistance factor (φ_{De Ruiter} = 0.64) than the other two CPT methods.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

LRFD Highway Bridge Design Specifications. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.

LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 2nd ed. AASHTO Washington, D.C., 1998.

Paikowsky

S. G.

NCHRP Report 507: Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Deep Foundations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Allen

T. M.

Development of the WSDOT Pile Driving Formula and Its Calibration and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). FHWA WA-RD 610.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2005.

McVay

, Birgisson

, Zhang

, Perez

, and Putcha

Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Driven Piles Using Dynamic Methods—A Florida Perspective. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2000, pp. 55–66.

McVay

M. C.

, Birgisson

L. B.

, Nguyen

, and Kuo

Uncertainty in Load and Resistance Factor Design Phi, Factors for Driven Prestressed Concrete Piles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1808. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 99–107.

Allen

Development of a New Pile-Driving Formula and Its Calibration for Load and Resistance Factor Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2004. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 20–27.

Yang

, and Liang

Incorporating Long-Term Setup into Load and Resistance Factor Design of Driven Piles in Sand. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.

Nowak

A. S.

NCHRP Report 368: Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.

10.

Allen

T. M.

, Nowak

A. S.

, and Bathurst

R. J.

Transportation Research Circular E-C079: Calibration to Determine Load and Resistance Factors for Geotechnical and Structural Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.

11.

LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2007.

12.

DiMaggio

, Saad

, Allen

, Passe

, Goble

, Christopher

, DiMillio

, Person

, and Shike

FHWA Summary Report of the Geotechnical Engineering Study Tour (GEST). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.

13.

Paikowsky

, Regan

, and McDonnell

A Simplified Field Method for Capacity Evaluation of Driven Piles. FHWA RD-94-042, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.

14.

Schmertmann

J. H.

Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test, Performance, and Design. Report FHWA-TS-79-209. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1978.

15.

De Ruiter

, and Beringen

F. L.

Pile Foundations for Large North Sea Structures. Marine Geotechnology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1979, pp. 267–314.

16.

Bustamante

, and Gianeselli

Pile Bearing Capacity Prediction by Means of Static Penetrometer CPT. Proc., Second European Symposium Penetration Testing, Balkema, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Vol. 2, 1982, pp. 493–500.

17.

Eslami

, and Fellenius

B. H.

Pile Capacity by Direct CPT and CPTU Methods Applied to 102 Case Histories. Canadian Geotechnology Journal, Vol. 34, 1997, pp. 886–904.

18.

Davisson

Pile

Load Capacity. Proc., ASCE Conference on Design Construction and Performance of Deep Foundations, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.

19.

Kyfor

Z. G.

, Schnore

A. S.

, Carlo

T. A.

, and Bailey

P. F.

Static Testing of Deep Foundations. Report FHWA-SA-91-042. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1992.

20.

Tomlinson

M. J.

Foundation Design and Construction, 4th ed. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, 1980.

21.

Salgado

Engineering of Foundations. McGraw–Hill, New York, 2007.

22.

Thurman

A. G.

Discussion of Bearing Capacity of Piles in Cohesionless Soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, SM1, 1964, pp. 127–129.

23.

Nordlund

R. L.

Bearing Capacity of Piles in Cohesionless Soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, SM3, 1963, pp. 1–35.

24.

Nordlund

R. L.

Point Bearing and Shaft Friction of Piles in Sand. Presented at Fifth Annual Short Course on the Fundamentals of Deep Foundation Design, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1979.

25.

Abu-Farsakh

M. Y.

, and Titi

Probabilistic CPT Method for Estimating the Ultimate Capacity of Friction Piles. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2007.

26.

Goble

, Linkins

, and Rausche

Dynamic Studies on the Bearing Capacity of Piles: Phase III. Division of Solid Mechanics, Structures, and Mechanical Design, Case Western Reserve University, 1970.

27.

Becker

D. E.

Eighteenth Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Limit States Design for Foundations. Parts I and II. An Overview of the Foundation Design Process. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 33, 1996, pp. 956–1007.

28.

LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd ed. AASHTO Washington, D.C., 2004.

29.

Zhang

, Tang

W. H.

, and Ng

C. W. W.

Reliability of Axially Loaded Driven Pile Groups. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 12, 2001, pp. 1051–1060.

30.

Kim

, Gao

, and Srivatsan

T. S.

Modeling of Void Growth in Ductile Solids: Effects of Stress Triaxiality and Initial Porosity. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2004, pp. 379–400.

31.

McVay

M. C.

Load and Resistance Factor Design, Cost, and Risk: Designing a Drilled Shaft Load Test in Florida Limestone. Soil Mechanics, 2003, pp. 98–106.

32.

Hansell

W. C.

, and Viest

I.M.

Load Factor Design for Steel Highway Bridges. AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1971, pp. 113–123.

33.

Barker

R. M.

, Duncan

J. M.

, Rojiani

K. B.

, Ooi

P. S. K.

, Tan

C. K.

, and Kim

S. G.

NCHRP Report 343: Manuals for the Design of Bridge Foundations: Shallow Foundations, Driven Piles, Retaining Walls and Abutments, Drilled Shafts, Estimating Tolerable Movements, and Load Factor Design Specifications and Commentary. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.

34.

Briaud

J.-L.

, and Tucker

L. M.

Measured and Predicted Axial Response of 98 Piles. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 8, 1988, pp. 984–1001.