Effect of Auditory Road Safety Alerts on Brake Response Times of Younger and Older Male Drivers

Abstract

In-vehicle technology is increasingly being implemented to assist drivers. These technologies could improve driver safety or, conversely, introduce distractions that reduce safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed, commercially available road safety device (Otto Driving Companion, Persen Technologies Inc.) that provides drivers with auditory alerts based on position and velocity data acquired via the Global Positioning System. Auditory alarms warn of situations such as speeding, crosswalks, and red light cameras. To study emergency braking situations, simulated driving was used (STISIM Driving Simulator). Younger male drivers (30 to 50 years old, n = 16) and older male drivers (70+, n = 14) participated in two sessions. In the first session, they were tested for underlying driving abilities, and they practiced driving on the simulator. In the second session, they were refamiliarized with the simulator and then drove two blocks of 10 trials, with and without auditory alerts. Braking events in each trial were either expected (e.g., person crossing at a crosswalk) or unexpected (e.g., person jaywalking). The presentation of auditory alerts resulted in faster brake response times with expected events for both groups (p < .01), and they resulted in even faster response times for the older subjects for unexpected events (p < .05). The auditory alerts also reduced the proportion of events with crashes for the older subjects (from 25.3 ± 21.7% to 10.8 ± 11.9%, p < .05). In conclusion, this simulator study demonstrated that there may be road safety benefits associated with auditory alerts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hanowski

R. J.

, Perez

M. A.

, and Dingus

T. A.

Driver Distraction in Long-Haul Truck Drivers. Transportation Research F—Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2005, pp. 441–458.

Beede

K. E.

, and Kass

S. J.

Engrossed in Conversation: The Impact of Cell Phones on Simulated Driving Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 415–421.

Vrkljan

B. H.

, and Miller-Polgar

Advancements in Vehicular Technology: Potential Implications for the Older Driver. International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1–2, 2005, pp. 88–105.

Caird

In-Vehicle Intelligent Transportation Systems: Safety and Mobility of Older Drivers. In Conference Proceedings 27: Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 236–255.

McEvoy

S. P.

, Stevenson

M. R.

, and Woodward

The Impact of Driver Distraction on Road Safety: Results from a Representative Survey in Two Australian States. Injury Prevention, 12, No. 4, 2006, pp. 242–247.

Stutts

J. C.

, Reinfurt

D. W.

, and Rodgman

E. A.

The Role of Driver Distraction in Crashes: An Analysis of 1995–1999 Crashworthiness Data System Data. Annual Proceedings of the Association for Advanced Automotive Medicine, Vol. 45, 2001, pp. 287–301.

Lam

L. T.

Distractions and the Risk of Car Crash Injury: The Effect of Drivers’ Age. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2002, pp. 411–419.

Stutts

, Feaganes

, Reinfurt

, Rodgman

, Hamlett

, Gish

, and Staplin

Driver's Exposure to Distractions in Their Natural Driving Environment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1093–1101.

Merat

, Anttila

, and Luoma

Comparing the Driving Performance of Average and Older Drivers: The Effect of Surrogate In-Vehicle Information Systems. Transportation Research F—Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2005, pp. 147–166.

10.

Chaparro

, Wood

J. M.

, and Carberry

Effects of Age and Auditory and Visual Dual Tasks on Closed-Road Driving Performance. Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 82, No. 8, 2005, pp. 747–754.

11.

Horberry

, Anderson

, Regan

M. A.

, Triggs

T. J.

, and Brown

Driver Distraction: The Effects of Concurrent In-Vehicle Tasks, Road Environment Complexity, and Age on Driving Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2006, pp. 185–191.

12.

Rizzo

, Stierman

, Skaar

, Dawson

J. D.

, Anderson

S. W.

, and Vecera

S. P.

Effects of a Controlled Auditory-Verbal Distraction Task on Older Driver Vehicle Control. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1865, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 1–6.

13.

Anstey

K. J.

, Wood

, Lord

, and Walker

J. G.

Cognitive, Sensory, and Physical Factors Enabling Driving Safety in Older Adults. Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 45–65.

14.

McDowd

J. M.

, and Filion

D. L.

Aging, Selective Attention, and Inhibitory Processes: A Psychophysiological Approach. Psychology and Aging, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1992, pp. 65–71.

15.

Ball

, and Owsley

The Useful Field of View Test: A New Technique for Evaluating Age-Related Declines in Visual Function. Journal of the American Optometry Association, Vol. 64, No. 1, 1993, pp. 71–79.

16.

Ball

K. K.

, Roenker

D. L.

, Wadley

V. G.

, Edwards

J. D.

, Roth

D. L.

, McGwin

Jr. , Raleigh

, Joyce

J. J.

, Cissell

G. M.

, and Dube

Can High-Risk Older Drivers Be Identified Through Performance-Based Measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles Setting?

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2006, pp. 77–84.

17.

Mayhew

D. R.

, Simpson

H. M.

, and Ferguson

S. A.

Collisions Involving Senior Drivers: High-Risk Conditions and Locations. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2006, pp. 117–124.

18.

, Tang

H. Z.

, and Spence

Using Spatial Vibrotactile Cues to Direct Visual Attention in Driving Scenes. Transportation Research F— Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2005, pp. 397–412.

19.

, Tan

H. Z.

, and Spence

The Differential Effect of Vibrotactile and Auditory Cues on Visual Spatial Attention. Ergonomics, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2006, pp. 724–738.

20.

Jonsson

I. M.

, Zajicek

, Harris

, and Nass

Thank You, I Did Not See That: In-Car Speech-Based Information Systems for Older Adults. Proc., Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Portland, Ore., April 2–7, 2005, pp. 1953–1956.

21.

Staplin

, and Dinh-Zarr

T. B.

Promoting Rehabilitation of Safe Driving Abilities Through Computer-Based Clinical and Personal Screening Techniques. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2006, pp. 129–138.

22.

Campbell

J. L.

, Richard

C. M.

, Brown

J. L.

, and McCallum

Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.

23.

Kramer

A. F.

, Cassavaugh

, Horrey

W. J.

, Becic

, and May-hugh

J. L.

Influence of Age and Proximity Warning Devices on Collision Avoidance in Simulated Driving. Human Factors, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2007, pp. 935–949.

24.

Massie

D. L.

, Campbell

K. L.

, and Williams

A. F.

Traffic Accident Involvement Rates by Driver Age and Gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1995, pp. 73–87.

25.

Lees

M. N.

, and Lee

J. D.

The Influence of Distraction and Driving Context on Driver Response to Imperfect Collision Warning Systems. Ergonomics, Vol. 50, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1264–1286.