Safety Assessment of Different In-Vehicle Interface Designs for Bus Collision Warning Systems

Abstract

Numerous studies have concluded that collision warning systems (CWSs) help drivers be aware of imminent dangerous situations. Driving safety and ergonomics make designing a CWS a very important task. Many studies have explored the effects of different types of CWS interface designs on driving safety performance. However, most of these studies were for passenger cars, with few studies focusing on buses. This study investigates the effects of four different types of in-vehicle bus CWS interfaces on driver reaction time to front events (i.e., a lead vehicle breaking suddenly) and side events (i.e., a vehicle cutting in too close) using a bus driving simulator. Twenty-nine professional bus drivers participated in the experiment. For both front events and side events, the driving experiment results reveal that driver reaction times are highly correlated with crash occurrence. The four different types of bus CWS interface designs can significantly reduce driver reaction time. Driver response time is the shortest for the interface using a beep and symbol shown on a heads-up display indicating the direction of danger. This study concludes that buses should be equipped with CWSs to protect the safety of bus drivers and passengers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Human Factors in Forward Collision Warning Systems: Operating Characteristics and User Interface Requirements (SAE J2400). Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, Pa., 2003.

Harder

K. A.

Bloomfield

and Chihak

B. J.

. The Effectiveness of Auditory Side- and Forward-Collision Warnings in Winter Driving Conditions. Technical Report No. MN/RC 2003-14. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2003.

Ben-Yaacov

Maltz

and Shinar

. Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short- and Long-Term Driving Performance. Human Factors, Vol. 44, No. 2 2002, pp. 335–342.

Cheng

Hashimoto

and Suetomi

. Analysis of Driver Response to Collision Warning During Car Following. JSAE Review, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 231–237.

Moon

Y.-J.

Lee

and Park

. System Integration and Field Tests for Developing In-Vehicle Dilemma Zone Warning System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1826, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 53–59.

Belz

S. M.

Robinson

G. S.

and Casali

J. G.

. A New Class of Auditory Warning Signals for Complex Systems: Auditory Icons. Human Factors, Vol. 41, No. 4 1999, pp. 608–618.

Chen

W.-H.

Lee

S.-W.

Kao

K.-C.

and Chiou

J.-M.

. Young Driver Preferences and Experimental Investigation of Audio and Visual Interface Designs for In-Vehicle Information Systems. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.

Lin

T.-W.

Hwang

S.-L.

Chen

W.-H.

J.-M.

and Lee

S.-W.

. Evaluation of Human-Computer Interface for Collision Avoidance Warning Systems (CAWSs) in Buses. Proc., 36th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 2006.

Chen

W.-H.

Lin

C.-Y.

and Doong

J.-L.

. Effects of Interface Workload of In-Vehicle Information Systems on Driving Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1937, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 73–78.

10.

Littell

R. C.

Milliken

G. A.

Stroup

W. W.

Wolfinger

R. D.

and Schabenberber

. SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd ed. SAS Institute Inc., Gary, N.C., 2006.