Comparison of Georgia Department of Transportation Design Procedure with Mechanistic

Abstract

This research had several objectives: measure the dynamic modulus of commonly used hot-mix asphalt mix types, two aggregate base courses, and two soils that represent high and low values; compare the results of using measured moduli with Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Level 3 default moduli for the subgrade and aggregate base material; and compare design results using the AASHTO 1972 Interim Guide for Pavement Design currently being used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) with the MEPDG results. The research showed that the MEPDG Level 3 default values for resilient modulus of both soil and aggregate materials are significantly higher than the actual values determined from laboratory test results. Use of actual material properties and load spectra resulted in significantly greater structures being recommended than when Level 3 default values were used for the MEPDG design program. On the basis of these results, GDOT is cautioned against using the default values built into the MEPDG software and should conduct a thorough calibration study using Georgia materials before implementing the MEPDG design procedure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AASHTO Interim Guide for Pavement Design. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1972.

Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2007.

Nazzal

M. D.

Mohammad

L. N.

and Gapard

. Development of Resilient Modulus Prediction Models for Louisiana Subgrade Soils. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.

Gudishala

Development of Resilient Modulus Prediction Models for Base and Subgrade Pavement Layers from in Situ Devices Test Results. Master's thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2004.

Garcia

and Thompson

M. R.

. HMA Dynamic Modulus–Temperature Relations. FHWA Report ICT-07-006. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., 2007.

Bhasin

Button

J. W.

and Chowdhury

. Evaluation of Selected Laboratory Procedures and Development of Databases for HMA. Report TX-05/0-4203-3. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.

Romanoschi

Dumitru

and Dumitru

. Resilient Modulus and the Fatigue Properties of Kansas Hot Mix Asphalt Mixes. Kansas Department of Transportation Report K-Tran: KSU 02-6. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., 2006.

Azari

Mohseni

and Gibson

. Verification of Rutting Predictions from Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide Using Accelerated Loading Facility Data. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.

Williams

R. C.

Testing Wisconsin Asphalt Mixtures for the AASHTO 2002 Mechanistic Design Procedure. Report WHRP 07-06. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, 2007.

Comparison of Georgia Department of Transportation Design Procedure with Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References