Use of Entry-Only Automatic Fare Collection Data to Estimate Linked Transit Trips in New York City

Abstract

Many large transit systems use automatic fare collection (AFC) systems. Most AFC systems were designed solely for revenue management, but they contain a wealth of customer use data that can be mined to create inputs to operations planning and demand forecasting models for transportation planning. More detailed information than could ever be collected by any travel survey is potentially available if it is assumed that the transactional data can be processed to produce the desired information. Previous work in this field focused primarily on rail transit, since boardings at fixed stations are easier to locate than boardings of buses, which move around. This paper presents a case study for the Metropolitan Transit Authority's New York City Transit, a transit system in which a rider swipes a fare card only to enter a station or board a bus. This is the first work to include trips by all transit modes in a system that records the transaction only on rider entry, which is significantly more challenging because all the alighting locations need to be inferred and the bus boarding locations need to be estimated. No location information (from automated vehicle location technology or a Global Positioning System) was available for buses. Software that processes the 7 million–plus daily transactions and that creates a data set of linked transit trips was created. The data set can then be analyzed by using geographic information system-based query software to create reports, maps, origin–destination matrices, load profiles, and new data sets. Subway journeys are assigned by using a schedule-based shortest-path algorithm.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhao

Rail Transit OD Planning and Analysis Implications of Automated Data Collection Systems: Rail OD Matrix Inference and Path Choice Modeling Examples. MS thesis. Department of Urban Studies and Planning and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2004.

Barry

J. J.

, Newhouser

, Rahbee

, and Sayeda

Origin and Destination Estimation in New York City with Automated Fare System Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 183–187.

Rahbee

, and Czerwinski

Using Entry-Only Automatic Fare Collection Data to Estimate Rail Transit Passenger Flows at CTA. Proc., 2002 Transport Chicago Conference, Chicago, Ill., 2002.

Wilson

N. H. M.

, Zhao

, and Rahbee

The Potential Impact of Automated Data Collection Systems on Urban Public Transport Planning. In Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks. Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 75–99.

Utsunomiya

, Attanucci

, and Wilson

N. H.

Potential Uses of Transit Smart Card Registration and Transaction Data to Improve Transit Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1971, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 119–126.

Zhao

, Rahbee

, and Wilson

N. H. M.

Estimating a Rail Passenger Trip Origin–Destination Matrix Using Automatic Data Collection Systems.

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2007, pp. 376–387.

Slavin

, Rabinowicz

, Brandon

, Flammia

, and Freimer

Using Automatic Fare Collection Data, GIS, and Dynamic Schedule Queries to Improve Transit Data and Transit Assignment Models. In Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks ( Wilson

N. H. M.

, and Nuzzolo

, eds.). Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 101–118.