Precision of AASHTO TP62-07 for Use in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Flexible Pavements

Abstract

In the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), one of the most important material inputs for designing flexible pavements is the dynamic modulus (E^*). Currently, AASHTO has provided a provisional test specification for measuring the E^* of hot-mix asphalt mixtures, AASHTO TP62-07 [Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA)]. Under AASHTO TP62-07, recommendations are provided for sample preparation–compaction, measurement system, testing conditions–procedures, and calculations. Unfortunately, information regarding the general precision of the test method does not exist. With many different test machines capable of conducting AASHTO TP62-07 and the importance of E^* in flexible pavement design, an understanding of the general precision of the test method and its influence on the MEPDG is needed. This paper describes the results of a round-robin study conducted to address the need for a precision-type statement for AASHTO TP62-07. Seven laboratories, all having equipment compliant with the specifications in AASHTO TP62-07, were asked to laboratory age, compact, prepare, and test six HMA test specimens according to the provisions in AASHTO TP62-07. A statistical analysis was conducted on the test data in a precision statement environment. On the basis of the test results, an initial precision statement for AASHTO TP62-07 was generated and presented. The test results for the seven different laboratories were also used as inputs in the MEPDG to evaluate the relative differences in predicted pavement distresses. Results from the precision evaluation were used to recommend modifications to AASHTO TP62-07 to promote greater precision in different testing laboratories and the results were reevaluated in the MEPDG.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARA, Inc., and ERES Consultants Division. Guide for Mechanistic— Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final report, NCHRP Project 1-37A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm.

King

Determination of Dynamic Moduli in Uniaxial Compression for North Carolina Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete. MS thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2004.

Shah

, McDaniel

, and Gallivan

Evaluation of Mixtures Using Dynamic Modulus Tester: Results and Practical Considerations.

Electronic Journal of Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 74E, 2005.

Tran

N. H.

, and Hall

K. D.

Evaluation of Testing Protocols for Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1970, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 126–132.

Birgisson

, and Roque

Evaluation of the Gradation Effect on the Dynamic Modulus. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 193–199.

Robinette

, and Williams

R. C.

The Effects of the Testing History and Preparation Method on the Superpave Simple Performance Test.

Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 297–320.

Andrei

, Witczak

, and Mirza

M. W.

Development of Revised Predictive Model for the Dynamic (Complex) Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures: Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1-37A. Interim Team Technical Report. University of Maryland, College Park, 1999.

Christensen

D. W.

, Pellinen

, and Bonaquist

Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete.

Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 72, 2003, pp. 97–121.

Tran

, and Hall

Evaluating the Predictive Equation in Determining Dynamic Moduli of Typical Asphalt Mixtures Used in Arkansas.

Electronic Journal of Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 74E, 2005.

10.

Dongré

Predicted vs. SPT Measured E^* Values at 10°F and 130°F. Presented at Meeting of FHWA Expert Task Group on HMA Mixtures, Phoenix, Ariz., Feb. 2007.

11.

Bari

, and Witczak

Development of a New Revised Version of the Witczak E^* Predictive Model for Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures.

Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 381–424.

12.

Birgisson

, Sholar

, and Roque

Evaluation of a Predicted Dynamic Modulus for Florida Mixtures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2005, pp. 200–207.

13.

Bonaquist

Comparison of AASHTO TP62 and NCHRP Project 9-29 Simple Performance Test System. Presented at Meeting of FHWA Expert Task Group on HMA Mixtures, May 2006.

14.

Bonaquist

R. F.

, Christensen

D. W.

, and Stump

III NCHRP Report 513: Simple Performance Tester for Superpave Mix Design: First-Article Development and Evaluation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.

15.

Pellinen

Investigation of the Use of Dynamic Modulus as an Indicator of Hot-Mix Asphalt Performance. PhD dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe, 2001.

16.

Pellinen

, and Witczak

M. W.

Stress Dependent Master Curve Construction for Dynamic (Complex) Modulus.

Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 71, 2002, pp. 281–309.

17.

Tran

N. H.

, and Hall

K. D.

18.

Bonaquist

, and Christensen

D. W.

Practical Procedure for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Pavement Structural Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 208–217.