Comprehensive Evaluation of Effect of Climate in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design GuidePredictions

Abstract

Climatic and environmental conditions have significant effects on pavement performance but have been inadequately considered in previous design methods. The Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) accounts for these effects through the use of the enhanced integrated climatic model. The present study examined the effects of climate on pavement performance predictions and the effects of climatic file generation by using MEPDG. The paper details the effort required to compare performance predictions for composite pavement consisting of asphalt cement over portland cement concrete (PCC) for 610 locations across the United States, with the use of MEPDG, Version 1.0. Analysis of the results was performed at the national, regional, and local levels. Although in general the results agree with the anticipated trends of environmental effects on pavement performance, the prediction of performance according to the predicted transverse cracking in the PCC layer was found to contain inconsistencies. These inconsistencies are attributed to the quality of the climatic data. The paper concludes that the MEPDG climatic database should be cleansed of incomplete or questionable climatic data files to ensure reliable performance prediction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yoder

E. J.

, and Witczak

M. W.

Principles of Pavement Design. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1975.

Mamlouk

M. S.

, and Zaniewski

J. P.

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers, 2nd ed. Pearson Education Company, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2006.

, Khazanovich

, Darter

M. I.

, and Ardani

Analysis of Concrete Pavement Responses to Temperature and Wheel Loads Measured from Instrumented Slabs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1639, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 94–101.

Selezneva

O. I.

, Jiang

Y. J.

, Larson

, and Puzin

LTPP Computed Parameter: Frost Penetration. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-057. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.

Richter

C. A.

Seasonal Variations in the Moduli of Unbound Pavement Layers. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-079. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.

AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993.

ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division. Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final report, NCHRP Project 1–37A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. http://www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm.

Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2008.

Lytton

R. L.

, Pufahl

D. E.

, Michalak

C. H.

, Lang

H. S.

, and Dempsey

B. J.

An Integrated Model of the Climatic Effects on Pavements. Publication FHWA-RD-90-033. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1989.

10.

Larson

, and Dempsey

B. J.

Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model. Version 2.0. Final report. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1997.

11.

Hall

K. D.

, and Beam

Estimating the Sensitivity of Design Input Variables for Rigid Pavement Analysis with a Mechanistic–Empirical Design Guide. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1919, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 65–73.

12.

Graves

R. C.

, and Mahboub

K. C.

Pilot Study in Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis of NCHRP Design Guide for Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1947, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 123–135.

13.

Kannekanti

, and Harvey

Sensitivity Analysis of 2002 Design Guide Distress Prediction Models for Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement. Report UCPRC-DG-2006–01. California Department of Transportation, University of California, Davis and Berkeley, 2006.

14.

Khazanovich

, Yut

, Husein

, Turgeon

, and Burnham

T. R.

Adaptation of Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Design of Minnesota Low-Volume Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2087, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 57–67.

15.

Hiller

J. E.

, and Roesler

J. R.

Determination of Critical Concrete Pavement Fatigue Damage Locations Using Influence Lines. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 8, July–August 2005, pp. 599–607.

16.

Zapata

C. E.

, and Houston

W. N.

NCHRP Report 602: Calibration and Validation of the Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model for Pavement Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.

17.

Birgisson

, Ovik

, and Newcomb

D. E.

Analytical Predictions of Seasonal Variations in Flexible Pavements: Minnesota Road Research Project Site. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1730, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 81–90.

18.

NCHRP Research Results Digest No. 307: Independent Review of the Mechanistic–Empirical Design Guide and Software. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.

19.

United Kingdom Meteorological Office. Met Office: Climate Averages. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/. Accessed July 15, 2009.