As the modern roundabout continues to grow in popularity in the United States, more states are considering or implementing statewide roundabout programs. To assist states in implementing statewide roundabout programs, a review of four such programs was conducted in Kansas, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin. The review was completed through an examination of published state roundabout guides and interviews. Results from the review indicate that agency buy-in, public perception, and establishment of a statewide roundabout policy all play crucial roles in the success or failure of a statewide roundabout program. It is recommended, therefore, that agencies focus on these areas to ensure success in establishing a roundabout program statewide.
RodegerdtsL. A., CiborA., and PochowskiA.Status of Roundabouts in North America. 2008 TRB Roundabout Conference. Kansas City, Mo., May 2008.
3.
RodegerdtsL., BloggM., WempleE., MyersE., KyteM., DixonM. P., ListG. F., FlanneryA., TroutbeckR., BrilonW., WuN., PersaudB. W., LyonC., HarkeyD. L., and CarterD.NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States.Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2007.
4.
RobinsonB. W., and BaredJ. G.Roundabouts: An Informational Guide.FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 2000.
CunninghamR. B.Maryland's Roundabouts: Accident Experience and Economic Evaluation.Maryland State Highway Administration, Office of Traffic and Safety, 2007.
ADA Home Page.U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.ada.gov. Accessed Oct. 17, 2008.
12.
SchroederB. J., RouphailN. M., and HughesR. G.Toward Roundabout Accessibility: Exploring the Operational Impacts of Pedestrian Signalization at Modern Roundabouts.Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Journal of Transportation Engineers, 2008.
13.
AshmeadD. H., GuthD., WallR. S., LongR. G., and PonchilliaP. E.Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, 2005, pp. 812–821.
14.
WallR., LongR., GuthD., AshmeadD., and PonchilliaP.Roundabouts: Problems of and Strategies for Access. International Congress Series, Vol. 1282, September 2005, pp. 1085–1088.
15.
GuthD., AshmeadD., LongR., WallR., and PonchilliaP.Blind and Sighted Pedestrians' Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human Factors. Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 314–331.
16.
United States Access Board.Revised Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. Public Rights-of-Way. November 23, 2005. http://www.access-board.gov/PROWAC/draft.htm. Accessed Oct. 22, 2008.
17.
MyersE. J.Modern Roundabouts for Maryland.Institute of Transportation Engineers Consultants Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
18.
MyersE. J., and PochowskiA.Maryland Roundabout Program, Early Years and Program Growth.Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Baltimore, Md., 2008.
19.
BaranowskiB. (ed.). Pedestrian Crosswalk Signals at Roundabouts: Where Are They Applicable? Transportation Research E-Circular E-C083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., May 2005.
