This study uses data from Sylhet, Bangladesh, to examine the relationship between the distance to school locations and attendance to understand how transport can positively influence school attendance. Logit regression models and a database of 3,402 households were used to correlate household schooling decisions with the built environment, local infrastructure, and household and individual characteristics. Travel demand for school trips was examined to identify how transportation can aid or hinder literacy objectives. Among other findings, two underserved populations were identified: (a) inner-city slum residents and (b) low-income remote households. Two possible transport actions for them are to increase (a) school supply in remote areas to improve accessibility and (b) public investment in affordable bus transit to improve mobility for students who travel to distant school locations. Thus, a combination of economic and transportation policies would likely increase literacy rates and overall educational attainment, which in turn would result in greater future educational equity among Sylhet residents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GannonC. A., and LiuZ.Poverty and Transport.Discussion Paper No. 30. Transport Division, Transport and Water Urban Development, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1997.
2.
ZaidiS., and MurgaiR.Poverty in Bangladesh: Building on Progress.Report No. 24299-BD. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit, South Asia Region, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2002.
VermeerschC., KremerM., CenterL., and FloorT.School Meals, Educational Achievement, and School Competition: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation.Report No. 3523. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2004.
MashiriM., ZukuluR., and BuitenD.Improving Children's Mobility and Access to Socio-Economic Opportunities: A Synthesis of Literature. Presented at 24th Annual Southern African Transport Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 2005.
7.
LitmanT.Evaluating Transportation Equity. World Transport Policy and Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, pp. 50–65.
8.
HartellA. M.Methodological Challenges of Environmental Justice Assessments for Transportation Projects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2013, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 21–29.
9.
SanchezT. W., and WolfJ. F.Environmental Justice and Transportation Equity: A Review of Metropolitan Planning Organizations. Presented at Racial Equity in Transportation: Establishing Priorities for Research and Policy, Washington, D.C., 2005.
10.
VasconcellosE. A.Rural Transport and Access to Education in Developing Countries: Policy Issues. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997, pp. 127–136.
11.
AhmedA. U., and Del NinnoC.Food for Education Program in Bangladesh: An Evaluation of Its Impact on Educational Attainment and Food Security.FCND Briefs. Discussion Paper No. 0138. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., 2002.
12.
HaiderM., and BadamiM. G.Balancing Efficiency and Equity in Public Transit in Pakistan. In The Inclusive City: Infrastructure and Public Services for the Urban Poor in Asia, (LaquianA. A., TewariV., and HanleyL. M., eds.), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 2007, pp. 122–140.
13.
MolesworthK.Gender and Political Dynamics Mediating Mobility and Access to Health Services and Female Reproductive Health in Rural Nepal. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 2007, pp. 89–106.
RichardsonA. J., AmptE. S., and MeyburgA. H.Survey Methods for Transport Planning.Eucalyptus Press, Parkville, Australia, 1995.
17.
HandyS.Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and Its Implications for Non-Work Travel. Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1992, pp. 253–267.
18.
CerveroR.Transit-Based Housing in California: Evidence on Ridership Impacts. Transport Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1994, pp. 174–183.
19.
EwingR., and CerveroR.Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
20.
AjzenI.The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179–211.
21.
ArmitageC. J., and ConnerM.Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40, 2001, pp. 471–499.
22.
DeutschK. E., and GouliasK. G.Investigating the Impact of Sense of Place on Travel Behavior Using an Intercept Survey Methodology. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
23.
Ben-AkivaM., McFaddenD., TrainK., WalkerJ., BhatC., and BierlaireM.Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges. Marketing Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 163–175.
24.
ShafiqM. N.Household Schooling and Child Labor Decisions in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2007, pp. 946–966.
25.
Introduction to SPSS.Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group, University of California, Los Angeles. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/notes2/. Accessed Jan. 24, 2008.
26.
RobinsonM.Does Decentralisation Improve Equity and Efficiency in Public Service Delivery Provision?IDS Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2007, pp. 7–17.
27.
KhandkerS. R., BakhtZ., and KoolwalG. B.The Poverty Impacts of Rural Roads: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2009, pp. 685–722.
28.
Morello-FroschR., PastorM.Jr., PorrasC., and SaddJ.Environmental Justice and Regional Inequality in Southern California: Implications for Future Research. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2002, pp. 149–154.
29.
LinJ., and LongL.What Neighborhood Are You In? Empirical Findings of Relationships between Residential Location, Lifestyle, and Travel. Transportation, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 739–758.
30.
StrathmanJ. G., DuekerK. J., and DavisJ. S.Effects of Household Structure and Selected Travel Characteristics on Trip Chaining. Transportation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1994, pp. 23–45.
31.
CraneR., and CrepeauR.Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1998, pp. 225–238.
32.
BagleyM. N., and MokhtarianP. L.The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 279–297.
33.
KawabataM.Job Access and Employment among Low-Skilled Auto-less Workers in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1651–1668.
34.
WalkerJ. L., and LiJ.Latent Lifestyle Preferences and Household Location Decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007, pp. 77–101.
