Impact of Variations in Travel Demand and Network Supply Factors for Evacuation Studies

Abstract

Traffic simulation models are frequently used to support decisions when an evacuation is planned. These models typically focus on traffic dynamics and the effect of traffic control measures to locate possible bottlenecks and predict evacuation times. However, a clear view of the crucial factors that determine evacuation time and emergent traffic states is lacking. In this paper, a structured and comprehensive sensitivity analysis identifies and quantifies the impact of variations in travel demand and network supply in the case of evacuation. The sensitivity analysis involves applying the macroscopic evacuation traffic simulation model EVAQ, in which aspects such as trip generation, departure rates, route flow rates, road capacities, and maximum speeds are systematically varied. That is accomplished using a case study that describes evacuation of the Rotterdam, Netherlands, metropolitan area. Departure rates and route flow rates are found to have a substantial nonlinear impact on network conditions and arrival pattern, particularly when the network load is relatively high, whereas trip generation and road capacities have a smaller quasilinear impact. Maximum speeds, independent of the effect on road capacities, have no significant impact on evacuation. The results, discussion, and conclusions presented can be used to identify the most important factors in (a) verifying, calibrating, and validating an evacuation model; (b) designing a network for evacuation studies; and (c) evaluating and testing the robustness of evacuation plans.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Church

, and Sexton

Modeling Small Area Evacuation: Can Existing Transportation Infrastructure Impede Public Safety? Technical report. Caltrans Testbed Center for Interoperability Task Order 3021. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2002.

Sisiopiku

, Jones

, Sullivan

, Patharkar

, and Tang

Regional Traffic Simulation for Emergency Preparedness. Working paper. University Transportation Center for Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham and University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2004.

Han

L. D.

Evacuation Modeling and Operations Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Most-Desirable-Destination Approaches. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Chen

, and Zhan

F. B.

Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation of Urban Evacuation: Relative Effectiveness of Simultaneous and Staged Evacuation Strategies. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Williams

, Tagliaferri

, Meinhold

, Hummer

, and Rouphail

Simulation and Analysis of Freeway Lane Reversal for Coastal Hurricane Evacuation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2007, pp. 61–72.

Tagliaferri

Use and Comparison of Traffic Simulation Models in the Analysis of Emergency Evacuation Conditions. Thesis. North Carolina State University, 2005.

Franzese

, and Han

L. D.

Traffic Modeling Framework for Hurricane Evacuation. Technical report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2001.

Rathi

A. K.

, and Solanki

R. S.

Simulation of Traffic Flow During Emergency Evacuations: A Microcomputer-Based Modeling System. Proc. 1993 IEEE Winter Simulation Conference, Los Angeles, Calif., 1993.

Pidd

, de Silva

F. N.

, and Eglese

CEMPS: A Configurable Evacuation Management and Planning System—A Progress Report. Proc. 1993 IEEE Winter Simulation Conference, Los Angeles, Calif., 1993.

10.

Formulations of the DYNEV and I-DYNEV Traffic Simulation Models Used in ESF. Technical report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency by KLD Associates, Inc., 1984.

11.

Hobeika

A. G.

, and Jamei

MASSVAC: A Model for Calculating Evacuation Times Under Natural Disaster. Proc. Computer Simulation in Emergency Planning, La Jolla, Calif., 1985.

12.

Sherali

H. D.

, Carter

T. B.

, and Hobeika

A. G.

A Location-Allocation Model and Algorithm for Evacuation Planning Under Hurricane/Flood Conditions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1991, pp. 439–452.

13.

Pel

A. J.

, Bliemer

M. C. J.

, and Hoogendoorn

S. P.

EVAQ: A New Analytical Model for Voluntary and Mandatory Evacuation Strategies on Time-Varying Networks. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transport Systems Conference, Beijing, 2008.

14.

Pel

A. J.

, Hoogendoorn

S. P.

, and Bliemer

M. C. J.

Evacuation Modeling Including Traveler Information and Compliance Behavior. Proc. 1st International Conference on Evacuation Modeling and Management, The Hague, Netherlands, 2009.

15.

Pel

A. J.

, Bliemer

M. C. J.

, and Hoogendoorn

S. P.

Hybrid Route Choice Modeling in Dynamic Traffic Assignment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2091, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 100–107.

16.

Ben-Akiva

, and Bierlaire

Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short-Term Travel Decisions. Handbook of Transportation Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass., 1999.

17.

Bliemer

M. C. J.

Dynamic Queuing and Spillback in Analytical Multiclass Dynamic Network Loading Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2029, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 14–21.

18.

Radwan

A. E.

, Hobeika

A. G.

, and Sivasailam

A Computer Simulation Model for Rural Network Evacuation Under Natural Disaster. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, Vol. 55, No. 9, 1985, pp. 25–30.

19.

Stopher

P. R.

, Rose

, and Alsnih

Dynamic Travel Demand for Emergency Evacuation: The Case of Bushfires. Working paper. ITLS, University of Sydney, Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2004.

20.

, Wilmot

C. G.

, Zhang

, and Baker

E. J.

Modeling the Hurricane Evacuation Response Curve. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2022, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 94–102.

21.

, and Wilmot

C. G.

Static Versus Dynamic and Aggregate Versus Disaggregate: Comparison Between Practice and Research in Hurricane Evacuation Travel Demand Modeling. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.

22.

Southwest Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation Study: Transportation Model Support Document. Technical report. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., Tallahassee, Fla., 2000.

23.

Wilmot

C. G.

, and Mei

Comparison of Alternative Trip Generation Models for Hurricane Evacuation. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 170–178.

24.

Hamdar

S. H.

Towards Modeling Driver Behavior Under Extreme Conditions. MSc thesis. University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.

25.

, Tamminga

, Drolenga

, de Wit

, and van der Berg

Evacuation Plan of the City of Almere: Simulating the Impact of Driving Behaviors on Evacuation Clearance Time. Proc. 1st International Conference on Evacuation Modeling and Management, The Hague, Netherlands, 2009.