Choosing the Right Express Services for Bus Corridor with Capacity Restrictions

Abstract

In public transit systems with high demand levels, the use of express bus services that serve only a subset of stops along certain routes appears to be a promising alternative given the benefits that they offer to both users and operators. In practice, express services in systems such as Transmilenio (Bogota, Colombia), Transantiago (Santiago, Chile), and Metro Rapid (Los Angeles, California) have proved highly appealing. To determine what types of express services would be attractive on a bus corridor given the characteristics of its demand, four parameters are defined for identifying corridor demand profiles: the base load profile shape, the scale of demand, the demand imbalance between the outbound and inbound directions, and the average trip length. A series of indicators was also defined to measure the potential benefits of express services in the scenarios studied. The results of the experimental simulations show that a crucial parameter for determining the potential benefits of express services is the average trip length along the corridor. The incorporation of express services is particularly attractive in corridors with demand profiles that increase or decrease monotonically. In addition, the results suggest that in other cases, the complexity of the demand shape could allow for more complex express service patterns.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Leiva

, Muñoz

J. C.

, Giesen

, and Larrain

Design of Limited-Stop for an Urban Bus Corridor with Capacity Constraints. Transportation Research B (in press). doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.01.003.

Furth

P. G.

, and Day

F. B.

Transit Routing and Scheduling Strategies for Heavy Demand Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1011, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 23–26.

Furth

P. G.

Short Turning on Transit Routes. In Transportation Research Record 1108, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 42–52.

Ceder

, and Stern

H. I.

Deficit Function Bus Scheduling with Deadheading Trip Insertion for Fleet Size Reduction. Transportation Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1981, pp. 338–363.

Ceder

, and Wilson

Bus Network Design. Transportation Research B, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1986, pp. 331–344.

Leblanc

Transit System Network Design. Transportation Research B, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1988, pp. 383–390.

Baaj

M. H.

, and Mahmassani

H. S.

Artificial Intelligence–Based System Representation and Search Procedures for Transit Route Network Design. In Transportation Research Record 1358, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 67–70.

Baaj

M. H.

, and Mahmassani

H. S.

A Hybrid Route Generation Heuristic Algorithm for the Design of Transit Networks. Transportation Research C, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1995, pp. 31–50.

Fan

, and Machemehl

Using a Simulated Annealing Algorithm to Solve the Transit Route Network Design Problem. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2006, pp. 122–132.

10.

Mauttone

, and Urquhart

M. E.

A Route Set Construction Algorithm for the Transit Network Design Problem. Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2009, pp. 2440–2449.

11.

Ceder

Designing Public Transport Network and Routes. In Advanced Modeling for Transit Operations and Service Planning ( Lam

W. H. K.

, and Bell

M. G. H.

, eds.), Pergamon Press, New York, 2003, pp. 59–92.

12.

Desaulniers

, and Hickman

Public Transit. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Volume 14: Transportation ( Barnhart

, and Laporte

, eds.), North–Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007, pp. 69–128.

13.

Fernández

J. E.

, De Cea

, and Norambuena

Una Metodología para el Diseño Topológico de Sistemas de Transporte Público Urbano de Pasajeros. Proc. 11th Congreso Chileno de Ingeniería de Transporte, Santiago, Chile, 2003.

14.

Fernández

J. E.

, De Cea

, and Malbran

R. H.

Demand Responsive Urban Public Transport System Design: Methodology and Application. Transportation Research A, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 951–972.

15.

De Cea

, and Fernández

J. E.

Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport Systems: An Equilibrium Model. Transportation Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1993, pp. 133–147.

16.

Chriqui

, and Robillard

Common Bus Lines. Transportation Science, Vol. 9, 1975, pp. 115–121.

17.

Nuzzolo

Schedule-Based Transit Assignment Models. In Advanced Modeling for Transit Operations and Service Planning ( Lam

W. H. K.

, and Bell

M. G. H.

, eds.), Pergamon Press, New York, 2003, pp. 125–163.

18.

Ortúzar

J. D.

, and Willumsen

Modelling Transport, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2001.

19.

Fernández

J. E.

, and De Cea

Informe Ejecutivo Estudio: Análisis Modernización de Transporte Público, VI Etapa. SECTRA, Santiago, Chile, 2003.