Evaluation of North Dakota's 4.75-mm Superpave Mixes for Thin Overlay Applications

Abstract

Because of the decline in aggregate supplies and the need for durable and rut-resistant hot-mix asphalt (HMA), the use of surplus fine aggregates in 4.75-mm mixes could be beneficial for HMA producers, aggregate suppliers, and highway agencies. The primary focus of this paper is to describe the development of and evaluate 4.75-mm Superpave^® mixes for use in thin overlays on non-Interstate highway pavements and maintenance applications. The asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) is used to examine the rut resistance of the 4.75-mm mixes. The acceptable APA rut depth was specified to be 9.5 mm. Because of the nature of the 4.75-mm mixes, the Superpave mix design was adjusted to avoid the production of mixes with excessive asphalt contents. A 6% air void design was crucial for the success of North Dakota's 4.75-mm mixes. The research study entailed four mix design cases involving two binders and two aggregate blends with different proportions of natural and crushed fines. Laboratory specimens were produced at 7.0% air voids, heated to either 64°C or 58°C for 6 h, and made to endure 8,000 APA loading cycles. The results indicate that all mix design cases were rut resistant and that mixes with higher percentages of crushed fines performed the best. For the design cases in which only the asphalt binder grade (PG) is the variable, the specimens were tested at different temperatures, so the results could not be compared, but a trend for an increase in rut depth with higher asphalt concrete contents was observed. Trial mixes with high percentages of natural fines failed the APA rut depth tests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Roberts

F. L.

, Kandhal

P. S.

, Brown

E. R.

, Lee

D. Y.

, and Kennedy

T. W.

Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction, 2nd ed. National Asphalt Pavement Association Education Foundation, Lanham, Md., 1996.

Acott

Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Surfacings. Information Series 110. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, Md., 1991.

Cooley

L. A.

Jr. , and Brown

E. R.

Potential of Using Stone Matrix Asphalt for Thin Overlays. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1749, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 46–52.

Cooley

L. A.

Jr. , James

R. S.

, and Buchanan

M. S.

Development of Mix Design Criteria for 4.75 mm Superpave Mixes. Final report prepared for Southeastern Superpave Center Pooled Fund. National Center for Asphalt Technology Report 02–04. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Ala., 2002.

Cooly, A. 4.75 mm Superpave Mixes. National Superpave News, Vol. 3, No. 2, Fall 2001, p. 9.

Williams

Development of 4.75 mm Superpave Mixes. Report MBTC-2030. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 2006.

Xie

, Cooley

L. A.

Jr. , and Huner

M. H.

4.75 mm NMAS Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Mixtures. Draft report. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Ala., 2003.

Cooley

L. A.

Jr. , Huner

M. H.

, and Brown

E. R.

Use of Screenings to Produce HMA Mixtures. National Center for Asphalt Technology Report 02–10. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Ala., 2002.

Kandhal

P. S.

, and Cooley

L. A.

Coarse vs. Fine-Graded Superpave Mixtures: Comparative Evaluation of Resistance to Rutting. NCAT Report 02-02. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Ala., 2002.

10.

Suleiman

Evaluation of Coarse-Graded HMA Pavements in North Dakota Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer. Proc. 4th International Gulf Conference on Road, CRS Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2008, pp. 621–628.

11.

Superpave for Low Capacity Facilities, Municipalities, and Maintenance: Findings and Recommendations of the Regional Workshop, Enfield, Conn., 2001.

12.

Draft Specification for 4.75-mm Mixture. Memorandum from the 4.75-mm Mixture Task Force, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2002.

13.

Hansen, K. Pavement Preservation with Thin Overlays. Better Roads, June 2003.

14.

Zaniewski

J. P.

, and Diaz

D. D.

Evaluation of 4.75mm Superpave Mix Criteria for West Virginia. Asphalt Technology Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, W. Va., Oct. 2003.

15.

Kandhal

P. S.

, and Cooley

L. A.

Jr. , NCHRP Report 508: Accelerated Laboratory Rutting Tests: Evaluation of the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.