Influence of Mineralogy and Plasticity Index on the Stabilization Effectiveness of Expansive Clays

Abstract

Stabilization with additives such as lime and cement has been practiced for many years and has proved effective in improving the behavior of expansive soils. Stabilizer design based on plasticity index (PI) and soil gradation is also a widely accepted method. However, some subsoils treated by this methodology have exhibited premature failures. Clay mineralogy plays an active and important role in the chemical reactions between soil and additives. A research study was conducted on six natural expansive soils with known clay mineralogy to evaluate the effectiveness of stabilization by using existing PI-based design charts. Engineering performance of treated soils was studied for long-term durability by exposing these soils to wetting and drying cycles and measuring both the volume change and the unconfined compressive strength during and at select wetting and drying cycles. Treated soil specimens containing high percentages of montmorillonite failed in durability tests when the treatments used PI-based design methods. A few treated soils did not survive the 21 wetting and drying cycles or experienced higher volumetric strains of more than the limiting value. Additional durability studies showed that soils with higher montmorillonite contents could be effectively stabilized with higher dosages of lime and cement additives. A new design chart incorporates the percentage montmorillonite content of a soil. This design chart provides an approach in selecting the optimum dosage of stabilizer to stabilize montmorillonite-dominant soils.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jones

D. E.

, and Holtz

W. G.

Expansive Soils: The Hidden Disaster. Civil Engineering, Vol. 43, 1973, pp. 49–51.

Puppala

A. J.

, Mohammad

L. N.

, and Allen

Engineering Behavior of Lime-Treated Louisiana Subgrade Soil. In Transportation Research Record 1546, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 24–31.

Mitchell

J. K.

, and Soga

Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005.

Petry

T. M.

, and Armstrong

J. C.

Stabilization of Expansive Clay Soils. In Transportation Research Record 1219, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 103–112.

Tayabji

S. D.

, Nussbaum

P. J.

, and Ciolko

A. T.

Evaluation of Heavily Loaded Cement-Stabilized Bases. In Transportation Research Record 839, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 6–11.

Puppala

A. J.

, Pillappa

, Vasudevan

, and Hoyos

L. R.

Field Studies on Five Different Stabilized Subgrades for Enhancing the Performance of Low-Volume Pavements. Presented at Low-Volume Roads Conference, Austin, Tex., 2007.

Puppala

, Hoyos

, Viyanant

, and Musenda

Fiber and Fly Ash Stabilization Methods to Treat Soft Expansive Soils. Soft Ground Technology, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 112. Vol. 301, ASCE, Reston, Va., 2000, pp. 136–145.

Croft

C. P.

, McGeory

, and Carlson

D. H.

Physical Geology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.

Consoli

N. C.

, Lopes

L. D.

, and Heineck

K. S.

Key Parameters for the Strength Control of Lime-Stabilized Soils. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2009, pp. 210–216.

10.

Puppala

A. J.

, Kadam

, Madhyannapu

, and Hoyos

L. R.

Small Strain Shear Moduli of Chemically Stabilized Sulfate-Bearing Cohesive Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, pp. 322–336.

11.

Yong

R. N.

, and Ouhadi

V. R.

Experimental Study on Instability of Bases on Natural and Lime/Cement-Stabilized Clayey Soils. Applied Clay Science, Vol. 35, Nos. 3-4, 2007, pp. 238–249.

12.

Bell

F. G.

Lime Stabilization of Clay Minerals and Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1996, pp. 223–237.

13.

Little

D. N.

, Males

E. H.

, Prusinski

J. R.

, and Stewart

Cementitious Stabilization. In 79th Millennium Report Series, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.

14.

Petry

T. M.

Performance-Based Testing of Chemical Stabilizers. In Transportation Research Record 1589, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 36–41.

15.

Rao

S. M.

, Reddy

B. V. V.

, and Muttharam

The Impact of Cyclic Wetting and Drying on the Swelling Behavior of Stabilized Expansive Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2001, pp. 223–233.

16.

Hoyos

L. R.

, Laikram

, and Puppala

A. J.

Assessment of Seasonal Effects on Engineering Behavior of Chemically Treated Sulfate-Rich Expansive Clay. Proc. GEOPROB2005: International Conference on Problematic Soils, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa, North Cyprus, 2005, pp. 25–27.

17.

Stavridakis

E. I.

Evaluation of Engineering and Cement-Stabilization Parameters of Clayey-Sand Mixtures Under Soaked Conditions. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2005, pp. 635–655.

18.

Bailey

S. W.

Summary of Recommendations of AIPEA Nomenclature Committee on Clay Minerals. American Mineralogist, Vol. 65, 1980, pp. 1–7.

19.

Chittoori

B. C. S.

Clay Mineralogy Effects on Long-Term Performance of Chemically Treated Expansive Clays. PhD dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington, 2008.

20.

Harris

J. P.

, Sebesta

, and Scullion

Hydrated Lime Stabilization of Sulfate-Bearing Vertisols in Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1868, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 31–39.