Safety and Operational Assessment of Yield-to-Bus Electronic Warning Signs on Transit Buses

Abstract

Transit buses generally experience difficulties merging into traffic after stopping at off-traffic stops; this situation generates potential hazards for both the bus moving back into traffic and the surrounding vehicles. Several states have implemented yield-to-bus (YTB) laws and programs to help alleviate these hazards. One of the challenges facing YTB initiatives is the lack of quantitative data to justify effectiveness. In this paper, flashing electronic YTB signs that use light-emitting diodes on the back of buses were evaluated as a major effort of the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Office to assess the effectiveness of the YTB program. YTB behavior, safety conflicts, and reentry time were proposed as three performance measures to evaluate the safety and operational impacts of electronic YTB signs. It was found that electronic YTB signs had the potential to improve YTB behavior of motorists behind the bus. In addition, with the electronic YTB signs, the number of safety conflicts was either reduced or was at least no greater than those of the baseline scenario, which consisted of a YTB decal. The reentry time from pullout bays was also improved. Additional recommendations about compliance, installation, and operation of electronic YTB signs are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

King

R. D.

TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 49: Yield-to-Bus: State of the Practice. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants. Florida State Highway System Transit Safety Study. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2004.

Zhou

, and Bromfield

Moving the Bus Back into Traffic Safely—Signage and Lighting Configuration Phase I. FDOT BD 549–34. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2007.

Fitzpatrick

, Hall

K. M.

, Farnsworth

, and Finley

M. D.

TCRP Report 65: Evaluation of Bus Bulbs. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University. TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Higgins

, and Audirac

Accessing Transit: Guidelines for Florida Bus Passenger Facilities. Public Transit Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2004.

FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Stops, Spacing, Location and Design, http://www.fta.dot.gov/research_4361.html#TCRP. Accessed March 2010.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 ed. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

10.

Parker

, and Zegeer

Traffic Conflict Technique for Safety and Operations: Observer's Manual. FHWA-IP-88-27. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1989.

11.

FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Standard No. 108: Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2004/octqtr/pdf/49cr571.108.pdf. Accessed Oct. 2009.

12.

NHTSA. Interpretation Letter for Transpec Merge Alert. NHTSA Interpretations files, March 2008. http://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/07–005005as.htm. Accessed March 2010.