Research was undertaken to develop multicriteria tools for measuring and analyzing the impact of recurring and nonrecurring congestion on freight. Unlike previous studies, this work used several distinct data sources to analyze the effects of congestion on I-5 in the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area: Global Positioning System data from commercial trucks, Oregon Department of Transportation corridor travel time loop data, and incident data. A new methodology and algorithms combine these data sources and estimate the impact of recurrent and nonrecurrent congestion on reliability and delays, costs, and emissions of freight movements. The results suggest that traditional traffic sensor data tend to underestimate the impact of congestion on travel times and variability of commercial vehicles. Congestion is detrimental not only for carriers’ and shippers’ costs but also for the planet because of increases in greenhouse gas emissions and for the local community because of increases in oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, and other harmful pollutants. The developed methodology can provide useful freight operation and performance data for the freight community, transportation decision makers, and other transportation stakeholders.
HarrisonR., and SchofieldM.Developing Appropriate Freight Performance Measures for Emerging Users. SWUTC/07/473700-00073-1. Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2007.
4.
EiseleW. L., and DavidD. L.Conceptual Framework and Trucking Application for Estimating Impact of Congestion on Freight. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2168, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 94–103.
5.
BertiniR. L., HansenS., ByrdA., and YinT.Experience Implementing a User Service for Archived Intelligent Transportation Systems Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1917, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 90–99.
6.
WieczorekJ., HuanL., Fernandez-MoctezumaR. J., and BertiniR. L.Integrating an Automated Bottleneck Detection Tool into an Online Freeway Data Archive. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
7.
NihanN. L., ZhangX., WangY., and BrigliaP.Evaluation of Dual-Loop Data Accuracy Using Video Ground Truth Data. T1803.38. Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia, and Transportation Northwest, Seattle, March 2002.
8.
WangY., NihanN., AveryR., and ZhangG.Improving Truck and Speed Data Using Paired Video and Single-Loop Sensors. T2695.61. Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia, and Transportation Northwest, Seattle, 2006.
9.
WangY., CoreyJ., LaoY., and WuY.Development of a Statewide Online System for Traffic Data Quality Control and Sharing. TNW2009-12. Transportation Northwest, Seattle, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2009.
10.
HallenbeckM., McCormackE., NeeJ., and WrightD.Freight Data from Intelligent Transportation System Devices.Washington State Transportation Center and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2003.
11.
McCormackE., and HallenbeckM. E.ITS Devices Used to Collect Truck Data for Performance Benchmarks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1957, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 43–50.
12.
MonsereC., WolfeM., AlawakielH., and StephensM.Developing Corridor Level Truck Travel Time Estimates and Other Freight Performance Measures from Archived ITS Data.Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2009.
13.
MurrayD., JonesC., and ShortJ.Methods of Travel Time Measurement in Freight-Significant Corridors.American Transportation Research Institute, Arlington, Va., 2005.
14.
ShortJ., PickettR., and ChristiansonJ.Freight Performance Measures Analysis of 30 Freight Bottlenecks.American Transportation Research Institute, Arlington, Va., 2009.
McCormackE., MaX., KlowcowC., CurrareiA., and WrightD.Developing a GPS-Based Truck Freight Performance Measure Platform.Transportation Northwest Regional Center X, Washington State Transportation Center, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2010.
17.
MaX., McCormackE., and WangY.Processing Commercial GPS Data to Develop a Web-Based Truck Performance Measures Program. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2246, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, in press.
18.
ZhaoW., GoodchildA., and McCormackE.Evaluating the Accuracy of GPS Spot Speed Data for Estimating Truck Travel Speed. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
19.
WangM., SchrockS., and MulinazziT.Freight Data Collection Technique and Algorithm Using Cellular Phone and GIS Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2246, Washington, D.C., 2011, in press.
20.
TregoT. G., and MurrayD.Analysis of Operational Costs of Trucking. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
21.
SmallK., NolandR., ChuX., and LewisD.NCHRP 431: Valuation of Travel-Time Savings and Predictability in Congested Conditions for Highway User-Cost Estimation.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
22.
SmalkoskiB., and LevinsonD.Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Operators. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2005, pp. 89–102.
23.
The Value of Travel Time: Estimates for the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2005.Economics and Policy Analysis Unit, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2006.
24.
SchrankD., and LomaxT.2009 Urban Mobility Report.Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2009.
25.
KawamuraK.Perceived Value of Time for Truck Operators. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 31–36.
26.
CohenH., and SouthworthF.On the Measurement and Valuation of Travel Time Variability Due to Incidents on Freeways. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1999, pp. 123–131.
27.
ShortJ., TregoT., and WhiteR.Methodology for Deriving Cost Impact of Freight Bottlenecks on Trucking Industry. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2168, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 89–93.
28.
ScoraG., BoriboonsominK., and BarthM. J.Effects of Operational Variability on Heavy-Duty Truck Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
29.
BarthM. J., and BoriboonsominK.Real-World Carbon Dioxide Impacts of Traffic Congestion. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2058, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 163–171.
30.
BrodrickC. J., LacaE. A., BurkeA. F., FarshchiM., LiL., and DeatonM.Effect of Vehicle Operation, Weight, and Accessory Use on Emissions from a Modern Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1880, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 119–125.
31.
TimoshekA., EisingerD., BaiS., and NiemeierD.Mobile Source Air Toxics Emissions: Sensitivity to Traffic Volumes, Fleet Composition, and Average Speed. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2158, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 77–85.
32.
GajendranP., and ClarkN.Effect of Truck Operating Weight on Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37, No. 18, 2003, pp. 4309–4317.
33.
PiersonW. R., GertlerA. W., and RobinsonN. F.Real-World Automotive Emissions—Summary of Studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 30, No. 12, 1996, pp. 2233–2256.
