Technical studies, market trends, automaker announcements, and forecast assessments suggest that two automotive technologies—hybrid and diesel—will be prominent contributors toward achieving environmental and energy goals. Technology advances have led to a dramatic penetration of diesels into the European automobile market, while vehicles with hybrid electric–gasoline drivetrains have begun to see modest commercialization in the United States and Japan. This study quantitatively compares hybrid and diesel models in the 2010 U.S. market to discuss the potential for these two technologies in helping to meet future emission and efficiency objectives. The findings suggest that hybrid and diesel technologies offer prominent benefits in terms of fuel economy, greenhouse gas emissions, and vehicle performance. Diesel vehicles offer comparatively less greenhouse gas emissions than hybrids and provide an apparent criterion pollutant emission trade-off. Both technologies would have to experience cost reductions to become more mainstream in the U.S. automotive market.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update.International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.
2.
JohnsonT.Diesel Engine Emissions and Their Control: An Overview. Platinum Metals Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2008, pp. 23–27.
3.
Preliminary Discussion Paper—Amendments to California's Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations for Criteria Pollutants—LEV III.California Air Resources Board, El Monte, 2010.
4.
Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2008. EPA420-R-09-014. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009.
5.
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. EPA-420-R-10-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
6.
Statement of the California Air Resources Board Regarding Future Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards.California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 2010. http://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/2010/VehState.pdf.
7.
Notice of Upcoming Joint Rulemaking to Establish 2017 and Later Model Year Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions and CAFE Standards.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
ReynoldsC., and KandlikarM.How Hybrid-Electric Vehicles Are Different from Conventional Vehicles: The Effect of Weight and Power on Fuel Consumption. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007.
11.
AnF., and SantiniD. J.Mass Impacts on Fuel Economies of Conventional Vs. Hybrid Electric Vehicles.Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 2004.
12.
LaveL. B., and MacleanH. L.An Environmental-Economic Evaluation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Toyota's Prius Vs. Its Conventional Internal Combustion Engine Corolla. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 155–162.
13.
SullivanJ. L., BakerR. E., BoyerB. A., HamerleR. H., KenneyT. E., MunizL., and WallingtonT. J.CO2 Emission Benefit of Diesel (Versus Gasoline) Powered Vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2004, pp. 3217–3223.
14.
SchipperL., Marie-LilliuC., and FultonL.Diesels in Europe: Analysis of Characteristics, Usage Patterns, Energy Savings and CO2 Emission Implications. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 305–340.
15.
ColtmanD., TurnerJ. W. G., CurtisR., BlakeD., HollandB., PearsonR. J., ArdenA., and NuglischH.Project Sabre: A Close-Spaced Direct Injection 3-Cylinder Engine with Synergistic Technologies to Achieve Low CO2 Output. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 2008.
16.
KnittelC. R.Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector. UCD-ITS-RR-09-16. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 2009.
17.
AnF., and DeCiccoJ. M.Trends in Technical Efficiency Trade-Offs for the U.S. Light Vehicle Fleet.Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 2007.
18.
LutseyN., and SperlingD.Energy Efficiency, Fuel Economy, and Policy Implications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1941, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 8–17.
Hybrid Vehicle Handout.Climate Change Mitigation Workshop, Mexico City, Mexico, March 8–9, 2010. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2010.
22.
Interim Technical Assessment Report: Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards in Model Years 2017–2025.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NHTSA, and California Air Resources Board, 2010. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations/ldv-ghg-tar.pdf.
23.
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards: Joint Technical Support Document. EPA-420-R-10-901. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and NHTSA, 2010.
24.
OlszewskiM.Evaluation of the 2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid Synergy Drive System. ORNL/TM-2007/190. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2008.
25.
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards: Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA-420-R-10-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010.
26.
Batteries for Electric Cars: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Outlook to 2020.Boston Consulting Group, Boston, Mass., 2010.
27.
KromerM. A., and HeywoodJ. B.Electric Powertrains: Opportunities and Challenges in the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet. LFEE 2007-03 RP. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2007.
28.
LipmanT. E., and DelucchiM. A.A Retail and Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 11, 2006, pp. 115–132.
29.
KalhammerF. R., KopfB. M., SwanD. H., RoanV. P., and WalshM. P.Status and Prospects for Zero Emissions Vehicle Technology: Report of the ARB Independent Expert Panel 2007.California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, April 13, 2007.
30.
NelsonP. A., SantiniD. J., and BarnesJ.Factors Determining the Manufacturing Costs of Lithium-Ion Batteries for PHEVs. 24th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition (EVS-24), Stavanger, Norway, May 13–16, 2009.
31.
SantiniD. J., GallagherK. G., and NelsonP. A.Modeling of Manufacturing Costs of Lithium-Ion Batteries for HEVs, PHEVs, and EVs. 25th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition (EVS-25), Shenzhen, China, Nov. 5–9, 2010.
