Running Time Prediction for Signalized Urban Streets

Abstract

The development of a procedure for predicting the average running time along an urban street segment is described. Running time is shown to be a function of free-flow speed, running speed, residual lost time at the upstream intersection, and the volume of vehicles turning from the traffic stream. The procedure includes models for estimating free-flow speed, running speed, and residual lost time. These models were calibrated with field data from many sites collectively located in several states. The model for estimating free-flow speed includes variables for speed limit, median type, access point density, curb presence, and number of lanes. An increase in access point density was found to correspond to a reduction in free-flow speed. The model for estimating running speed includes a variable for flow rate. The effect of flow rate on speed is similar to that found on highways, such that speed decreases with an increase in flow rate, especially at high flow rates. The procedure is recommended for inclusion in the chapter on urban streets segments in the 2010 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dowling

R. G.

, and Cheng

W. W. K.

Evaluation of Speed Measurement and Prediction Techniques for Signalized Arterials. In Transportation Research Record 1564, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 20–29.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Prassas

E. S.

Investigation of an Improved Running Time Table and Related Observations on Average Travel Speed. Final Report. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 1998.

Fitzpatrick

, Carlson

, Brewer

M. A.

, Wooldridge

M. D.

, and Miaou

S.-P.

NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Bonneson

J. A.

, Pratt

, and Vandehey

Predicting the Performance of Automobile Traffic on Urban Streets. Final Report, NCHRP Project 3–79. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, January 2008. http://tcd.tamu.edu/Documents/Products.htm.

TRAF User Reference Guide. Version 5.0. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.

May

A. D.

Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.

Greenshields

B. D.

, Bibbins

J. R.

, Channing

W. S.

, and Miller

H. H.

A Study of Traffic Capacity. Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 14, 1935, pp. 448–477.

Bonneson

J. A.

Modeling Queued Driver Behavior at Signalized Junctions. In Transportation Research Record 1365, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 99–107.

10.

Gerlough

D. L.

, and Huber

M. J.

Special Report 165: Traffic Flow Theory. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976.

11.

Rakha

H. A.

, and Zhang

Estimating Traffic Stream Space Mean Speed and Reliability from Dual- and Single-Loop Detectors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1925, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 38–47.

12.

Freund

R. J.

, and Littell

R. C.

SAS System for Regression. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 1986.

13.

Special Report 254: Managing Speed: Review of Current Practices for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.