The behavior of drivers of heavy vehicles when making a decision or executing a lane-changing maneuver on arterial roads and freeways is investigated. Vehicle lane-changing maneuvers often result in instability in traffic flow. The impact on traffic flow of lane changes by heavy vehicles can be even more serious than that of lane changes by passenger vehicles because of vehicle characteristics and driver behavior. This impact is being exacerbated because the number of heavy vehicles and their share in the traffic steam are increasing. Models of lane-changing behavior were reviewed. It was found that the lane-changing maneuver of heavy vehicles has not received appropriate attention. Real-world data were applied to a comparison of this behavior with the behavior of passenger car drivers. The behavior of drivers is explored for both arterial roads and freeways considering the impact of the size of vehicles on the lane-changing maneuver. The results indicate that the type and size of vehicles influence the lane-changing maneuver, in particular on arterial roads. A new area of study is opened for investigating the microscopic behavior of heavy vehicles in a traffic steam with more detail and leads toward a model that incorporates the characteristics of heavy vehicles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Survey of Motor Vehicle Use.Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia, 2008.
2.
Australian Transport Statistics.Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics, Department of Infrastructure, Canberra, Australia, 2008.
3.
DaganzoC. F., CassidyM. J., and BertiniR. L.Possible Explanations of Phase Transitions in Highway Traffic. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, No. 5, 1999, pp. 365–379.
4.
Al-KaisyA., JungY., and RakhaH.Developing Passenger Car Equivalency Factors for Heavy Vehicles During Congestion. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, 2005, pp. 514–523.
5.
ArcherJ., and YoungW.Signal Treatments to Reduce Heavy Vehicle Crash-Risk at Metropolitan Highway Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, 2009, pp. 404–411.
6.
Greenhouse Gas Emission from Australian Transport: Base Case Projections to 2020.Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, 2005.
7.
PeetaS., ZhangP., and ZhouW.Behaviour-Based Analysis of Freeway Car–Truck Interactions and Related Mitigation Strategies. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 417–451.
8.
SarviM.Measuring and Modeling Dynamic of Heavy Commercial Vehicles and Their Interactions with Other Vehicles. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
9.
SarviM., and KuwaharaM.Using ITS to Improve the Capacity of Freeway Merging Sections by Transferring Freight Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2008, pp. 580–588.
10.
YangX., and ZhangN.Effects of the Number of Lanes on Highway Capacity. Proc. 14th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, 2007, pp. 351–356.
11.
AhnS., and CassidyM.Freeway Traffic Oscillations and Vehicle Lane-Change Manoeuvres. In 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (HeydeckerB., BellM., and AllsopR., eds.), Elsevier, New York, 2007, pp. 691–710.
12.
MoridpourS., RoseG., and SarviM.Effect of Surrounding Traffic Characteristics on Lane Changing Behaviour. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 11, 2010, p. 973.
13.
MoridpourS., SarviM., and RoseG.Modeling the Lane-Changing Execution of Multiclass Vehicles Under Heavy Traffic Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2161, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 11–19.
14.
ChangG. L., and KaoY. M.An Empirical Investigation of Macroscopic Lane-Changing Characteristics on Uncongested Multilane Freeways. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1991, pp. 375–389.
15.
DaganzoC.A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow. Part I: Long Homogeneous Freeway Sections. Transportation Research Part B, Vol, 36, 2002, pp. 131–158.
16.
DaganzoC.A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow. Part II: Merges and the Onset of Congestion. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 159–169.
17.
LavalJ. A., and DaganzoC. F.Lane-Changing in Traffic Streams. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 251–264.
18.
GippsP. G.A Model for the Structure of Lane-Changing Decisions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1986, pp. 403–414.
19.
McDonaldM., WuJ., and BrackstoneM.Development of a Fuzzy Logic Based Microscopic Motorway Simulation Mode. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 1997, pp. 82–87.
20.
GippsP. G.A Behavioural Car Following Model for Computer Simulation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 15, 1981, pp. 105–111.
21.
HidasP.Modelling Vehicle Interactions in Microscopic Simulation of Merging and Weaving. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 13, 2005, pp. 37–62.
22.
AhmedK. I., Ben-AkivaM., KoutsopoulosH. N., and MishalaniR. G.Models of Freeway Lane Changing and Gap Acceptance Behaviour. Proc. 13th International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, 1996, pp. 501–515.
23.
AhmedK. I.Modelling Drivers’ Acceleration and Lane Changing Behaviours. PhD thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1999.
24.
ToledoT., KoutsopoulosH. N., and Ben-AkivaM. E.Modeling Integrated Lane-Changing Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1857, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 30–38.
25.
ToledoT., KoutsopoulosH. N., and Ben-AkivaM.Integrated Driving Behaviour Modelling. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2007, pp. 96–112.
26.
ToledoT., KoutsopoulosH. N., and Ben-AkivaM.Estimation of an Integrated Driving Behavior Model. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2009, pp. 365–380.
27.
KitaH.A Merging-Give-Way Interaction Model of Cars in a Merging Section: A Game Theoretic Analysis. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 305–312.
28.
PeiY., and XuH.The Control Mechanism of Lane Changing in Jam Condition. Proc. 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Dalian, China, 2006, pp. 8655–8658.
29.
EspieS., SaadF., SchnetzlerB., BourlierF., and DjemameN.Microscopic Traffic Simulation and Driver Behaviour Modelling: The ARCHISIM Project. Road Safety in Europe and Strategic Highway Research Program, Lille, France, 1994.
30.
MendelJ. M.Fuzzy Logic Systems for Engineering: A Tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 83, No. 3, 1995, pp. 345–377.
31.
BrackstoneM., McDonaldM., and WuJ.Lane Changing on the Motorway: Factors Affecting Its Occurrence, and Their Implications. 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, 1998, pp. 160–164.
32.
WuJ., BrackstoneM., and McDonaldM.Fuzzy Sets and Systems for a Motorway Microscopic Simulation Model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 116, 2000, pp. 65–76.
33.
DasS., and BowlesB. A.Simulations of Highway Chaos Using Fuzzy Logic. Proc. 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 1999, pp. 130–133.
34.
DasS., BowlesB. A., HoughlandC. R., HunnS. J., and ZhangY.A Fuzzy Logic Model of Freeway Driver Behaviour. Proc. International ICSC Congress on Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications, New York, 1999.
35.
MoridpourS.Modelling the Lane Changing of Heavy Vehicles in Heavy Traffic Conditions. PhD thesis. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2010.
36.
YangH., AkiyamaT., and SasakiT.A Neural Network Approach to the Identification of Real Time Origin Destination Flows from Traffic Counts. Proc. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering, San Buenaventura, Calif., 1992.
37.
DoughertyM. S., and JointM.A Behavioural Model of Driver Route Choice Using Neural Networks. Proc. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering, San Buenaventura, Calif., 1992.
38.
HuntJ. G., and LyonsG. D.Modelling Dual Carriageway Lane Changing Using Neural Networks. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1994, pp. 231–245.
Highway Capacity Manual.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
42.
ThiemannC., TreiberM., and KestingA.Estimating Acceleration and Lane-Changing Dynamics from Next Generation Simulation Trajectory Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 90–101.
