Variations in Parameters of Time Headway Models According to Macroscopic Variables,Fundamental Diagram,and Exogenous Effects

Abstract

Relationships between macroscopic traffic level and time headway distribution are discussed. Several authors have studied time headway distribution as a function of aggregate traffic volume and have used various probabilistic models. The gamma-generalized queuing model (gamma-GQM) has been shown to have very high performance and effectiveness in modeling real-life time headway data in most cases. Consequently, the parameters of the gamma-GQM are studied to investigate the links between macroscopic information and time headway variable. The systematic data collected in 2005 from the RN 118 national roadway in France allowed study of the effects not only of traffic volume but also of traffic occupancy and space mean speed on time headway distribution. These macroscopic variables were obtained on the basis of the calculation aggregated over 6 min of data. A study of time headway distribution following the empirical fundamental diagram was also implemented. Exogenous conditions such as weather and lane type were taken into account. As a result, the variations of the gamma-GQM parameters were established and interpreted according to the various contexts. Two exogenous factor types influencing time headway distribution in the standard condition are proposed: impeding and propulsive factors. These two factors are differentiated by the tendencies of the scale parameters of the gamma-GQM compared with the corresponding values in the standard condition.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hoogendoorn

S. P.

, and Bovy

P. H. L.

New Estimation Technique for Vehicle-Type-Specific Headway Distributions. In Transportation Research Record 1646, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 18–28.

Luttinen

Statistical Analysis of Vehicular Time Headways. PhD thesis. University of Technology Lahti Center, Lahti, Finland, 1996.

D.-H.

, Aron

, and Cohen

Time Headway Variable and Probabilistic Modelling. Transportation Research Part C (in press).

Branston

Models of Single Lane Time Headway Distributions. Transportation Science, Vol. 10, No. 12, 1976, pp. 125–148.

Buckley

A Semi-Poisson Model of Traffic Flow. Transportation Science, Vol. 2, 1968, pp. 107–133.

Hoogendoorn

S. P.

, and Botma

Modeling and Estimation of Headway Distributions. In Transportation Research Record 1591, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 14–22.

May

Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.

Krbalek

, Seba

, and Wagner

Headways in Traffic Flow: Remarks from a Physical Perspective. Physical Review E, Vol. 64, 2001, p. 066119.

Haight

F. A.

, Whisler

B. F.

, and Mosher

W. W.

New Statistical Method for Describing Highway Distributions of Cars. In Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 40, 1961, pp. 557–564.

10.

Al-Ghamdi

A. S.

Analysis of Time Headways on Urban Roads: Case Study from Riyadh. Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, 2001, pp. 289–294.

11.

Grecco

, and Sword

Prediction of Parameters for Schuhl's Headway Distribution. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1968, pp. 36–38.

12.

Khasnabis

, and Heimback

C. L.

Headway-Distribution Models for Two-Lane Rural Highways. In Transportation Research Record 772, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 44–51.

13.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, Erdinc

, and Suravaram

K. R.

Approximated Headway Distributions of Free-Flowing Traffic on Ohio Freeways for Work Zone Traffic Simulations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 131–140.

14.

D.-H.

, Aron

, and Cohen

Comparison of Time Headway Distribution in Different Traffic Contexts. Proceeding of the World Conference of Transportation Research, Vol. 1261, 2010.

15.

Seddiki

Impact de la pluie sur le trafic autoroutier: Etude aux niveaux micro-, méso- et macroscopique. Recherche Transports Sécurité, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 13–24.

16.

Aron

, Biecheler

M.-B.

, and Peytavin

J.-F.

Observatoire des vitesses et des interdistances sur autoroutes. INRETS, Paris, 1997.

17.

Banks

J. H.

Average Time Gaps in Congested Freeway Flow. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 539–554.

18.

Luttinen

R. T.

Statistical Properties of Vehicle Time Headways. In Transportation Research Record 1365, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 92–98.

19.

Adams

Road Traffic Considered as a Random Series. Journal of the Institute of Civil Engineering, Vol. 4, 1936, pp. 121–130.

20.

Breiman

The Poisson Tendency in Traffic Distribution. Electronics Research Laboratory, Vol. 60, 1962, pp. 1–9.

21.

Gerlough

Use of Poisson Distribution in Highway Traffic. Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control, Saugatuck, Conn., 1955, pp. 1–58.

22.

Greenberg

The Log-Normal Distribution of Headways. Australian Road Research, Vol. 2, 1966, pp. 14–20.

23.

Cowan

Useful Headway Models. Transportation Research, Vol. 9, 1975, pp. 371–375.

24.

Zhang

, Wang

, Wei

, and Chen

Examining Headway Distribution Models with Urban Freeway Loop Event Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 141–149.