Impact of Environmental Site Location and Groundwater Table Depth on Thickness of Flexible Airfield Pavements

Abstract

This comprehensive sensitivity study of a newly developed computer code at Arizona State University incorporates the influence of environmental site factors and the groundwater table depth on flexible airfield pavement design and performance. The newly developed code, called ZAPRAM, is a mechanistically based pavement model based on limiting strain criteria. The completed study used the newly revised U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failure criteria for subgrade shear deformation. The experimental factorial conducted comprised three aircraft types, three levels of as-compacted (optimum) subgrade condition, two levels of design aircraft passes, and an environmental combination of six groundwater table depths and five environmentally different city locations. The methodology used in this study applied the same analytical method to achieve real-time environmental effects on unbound layer modulus as the new AASHTO Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide. The results of this effort showed for the first time the quantitative impact of the significant effects of climatic conditions at the design site, coupled with the importance of the depth of the groundwater table, on the predicted design thicknesses. Significant cost savings appear to be quite reasonable by using the principles of unsaturated soil mechanics in the new airfield pavement design procedure in ZAPRAM.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Witczak

M.W.

, Houston

W.N.

, Zapata

C.E.

, Richter

, Larson

, and Walsh

. Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Inter Team Technical Report (Seasonal 4), Improvement of the Integrated Climatic Model for Moisture Content Predictions. Internal report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, 2000.

Witczak

M.W.

, Andrei

, and Houston

W. N.

Development of the 2002 Guide for the

Development of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1–37A, Inter Team Technical Report (Seasonal 1), Resilient Modulus as Function of Soil Moisture: Summary of Predictive Models (Internal report). College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, 2000.

Witczak

M.W.

, Houston

W.N.

, and Andrei

. Development of the 2002 Guide for the Development of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1–37A, Inter Team Technical Report (Seasonal 2), Resilient Modulus as Function of Soil Moisture: A Study of the Expected Changes in Resilient Modulus of the Unbound Layers with Changes in Moisture for 10 LTPP Sites (Internal report). College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, 2000.

Witczak

M.W.

, Zapata

C.E.

, and Houston

W. N.

Models Incorporated into the Current Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model: NCHRP 9–23 Project Findings and Additional Changes After Version 0.7 (Internal report). Project NCHRP 1–40D, Final Report. College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, 2006.

Zapata

, Cary

C.E.

, Souliman

, Rosenbalm

, and Salim

. Comparison of Airfield Flexible Pavement Design Thickness Based on Differing Agency Limiting Subgrade Strain Criteria. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2305, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, in press.

Barker

, and Gonzalez

. Renovation of the CBR Design Procedure, Report 1- Understanding, Scrutinizing and Revamping the CBR Thickness Design Methodology, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., May 2006.

Barker

, and Gonzalez

. Renovation of the CBR Design Procedure. In 2nd International Airports Conference: Planning Infrastructure and Environment Proceedings, August 2006, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1–16.

Zapata

C.E.

, Perera

Y.Y.

, and Houston

W. N.

Matric Suction Prediction Model in New AASHTO Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2101, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 53–62.

McKeen

R.G.

, and Johnson

L. D.

Climate-Controlled Soil Design Parameters for Mat Foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 7, July 1990, pp. 1073–1094.

10.

Fredlund

D.G.

, and Xing

. Equations for the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1994, pp. 521–532.

11.

Perera

Y.Y.

, Zapata

C.E.

, Houston

W.N.

, and Houston

S. L.

Prediction of the Soil–Water Characteristic Curve Based on Grain-Size Distribution and Index Properties. In Geotechnical Special Publications 130–142: Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2005 Congress ( Rathje

E. M.

, ed.) (CD-ROM), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2005.

12.

Cary

C.E.

, and Zapata

C. E.

Enhanced Model for Resilient Response of Soils Resulting from Seasonal Changes as Implemented in “Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide.” In

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2170, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 36–44.

13.

Zapata

C. E.

A National Catalog of Subgrade Soil–Water Characteristic Curves and Selected Soil Properties for Use with the MEPDG. Research Results Digest 347, 2010, p. 23.