This study examined whether travelers are using the new Katy Freeway managed lanes (MLs) in Houston, Texas, as people stated that they would in their responses to a survey conducted in 2008, before the MLs opened. To check the veracity of intended behaviors, a new stated preference survey was given to Houston's Katy Freeway travelers in 2010. The 2010 survey yielded 3,325 respondents, of whom approximately 869 respondents had likely been participants in the 2008 survey. Mixed logit models were developed from the 869 responses, and their value of travel time savings were compared with the 2008 survey estimates. The implied mean value of travel time savings based on the 2010 survey was found to be about 48% of the sample mean hourly wage rate, similar to values estimated for the 2008 surveys. The value of travel time reliability was estimated as 56% of the sample mean hourly wage rate. Combining both the value of time and the value of reliability for these travelers results in a combined value of $61/h. This value is close to the value travelers are giving their travel time for their actual recent trips on the Katy Freeway (an average of $51/h). Thus it appears that travelers are factoring in (consciously or subconsciously) some additional value for the reliability of MLs when they choose to use these lanes. The percentage of travelers from the 2010 survey who actually used the MLs was similar to the percentage of 2008 survey respondents who indicated that they might or would definitely use MLs. These findings suggest that travelers are actually using and paying for MLs as they said they would. The results also suggest that the maximum willingness to pay for travel did not change much from before to after the opening of the MLs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Managed Lanes Projects: Current, Under Construction and Under Development. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station.http://managed-lanes.tamu.edu/projects. Accessed Dec. 22, 2011.
Katy Freeway website. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. www.katyfreeway.org. Accessed May 15, 2011.
4.
BurrisM., and PatilS.Estimating the Benefits of Managed Lanes.Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2009.
5.
PatilS., BurrisM., and ShawW. D.Travel Using Managed Lanes: An Application of a Stated Choice Model for Houston, Texas. Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, pp. 595–603.
6.
BeckerG. S.A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, Vol. 75, 1965, pp. 493–517.
7.
BeesleyM. E.The Value of Time Spent in Travelling: Some New Evidence. Economica, Vol. 32, 1965, pp. 174–185.
8.
OortC. J.The Evaluation of Travelling Time. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 8, 1969.
9.
Jara-DiazS.R., and GuevaraC. A.Behind the Subjective Value of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 29–46.
10.
De JongG., TsengY., KouwenhovenM., VerhoefE., and BatesJ.The Value of Travel Time and Travel Time Reliability.Technical Report. Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Amsterdam, 2007.
11.
CherlowJ. R.Measuring Values of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, 1981, pp. 360–371.
12.
LamT.C., and SmallK. A.The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 37, 2001, pp. 231–251.
13.
FeatherP., and ShawW. D.Estimating the Cost of Leisure Time for Recreation Demand Models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 38, 1999, pp. 49–65.
14.
HNTB Corporation. Technical Memorandum 6: Atlanta Regional Managed Lane System Plan. In GDOT Tolling and Traffic and Revenue Primer, Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, 2010.
15.
PerkV.A., DeSalvoJ.S., RodriguesT.A., VerzosaN.M., and BovinoS. C.Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation.Technical Report. Center for Urban Transportation Research, Florida Department of Transportation, Tampa, 2011.
16.
Ben-AkivaM., and MorikawaT.Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 24, 1990, pp. 485–495.
17.
CalfeeJ., and WinstonC.The Value of Automobile Travel Time: Implications for Congestion Policy. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 69, 1998, pp. 83–102.
18.
HensherD. A.Measurement of the Valuation of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 71–98.
19.
GhoshA.Valuing Time and Reliability: Commuters' Mode Choice from a Real Time Congestion Pricing Experiment.Dissertation. University of California, Irvine, 2001.
20.
BlackI.G., and TowrissJ. G.Demand Effects of Travel Time Reliability.U.K. Department of Transportation, London, 1993.
21.
PatilS., BurrisM., ShawW.D., and ConcasS.Variation in the Value of Travel Time Savings and Its Impact on the Benefits of Managed Lanes. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2011, pp. 547–65.
22.
TsengY.-Y.UbbelsB., and VerhoefE.Value of Time, Schedule Delay and Reliability: Estimates Based on Choice Behaviour of Dutch Commuters Facing Congestion.European Regional Science Association, Austria, 2005.
23.
SmallK.A., WinstonC., and YanJ.Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists' Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability. Econometrica, Vol. 73, 2005, pp. 1367–1382.
24.
SmallK.A., NolandR., ChuX., and LewisD.NCHRP Report 431: Valuation of Travel-Time Savings and Predictability in Congested Conditions for Highway User-Cost Estimation.Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
25.
BrownstoneD., and SmallK. A.Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 279–293.
26.
TilahunN., and LevinsonD.A Moment of Time: Reliability in Route Choice Using Stated Preference. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2010, pp. 179–187.
27.
ConcasS., and KolpakovA.Synthesis of Research on Value of Time and Value of Reliability.Center for Urban Transportation Research, Florida Department of Transportation, Tampa, 2009.
28.
BurrisM., DevarasettyP., and ShawW. D.Managed Lane Travelers—Do They Pay for Travel As They Claimed They Would?Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2011.
29.
DevarasettyP., BurrisM., and ShawW. D.Value of Travel Time and Reliability of Houston Managed Lane Travelers: Evidence from Stated Preference Survey and Actual Usage Data. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 46, 2012, pp. 1227–1240.
30.
HensherD., and GreeneW.The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 133–176.
31.
GreeneW.H., HensherD.A., and RoseJ.Accounting for Heterogeneity in the Variance of Unobserved Effects in Mixed Logit Models. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 75–92.
32.
BrownstoneD., and TrainK.Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, 1998, pp. 109–129.
33.
Ben-AkivaM., BolducD., and WalkerJ.Specification, Identification and Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model.Working Paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
34.
BhatC.R., and CastelarS.A Unified Mixed Logit Framework for Modeling Revealed and Stated Preferences: Formulation and Application to Congestion Pricing Analysis in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 593–616.
35.
GreeneW.H., and HensherD. A.Heteroscedastic Control for Random Coefficients and Error Components in Mixed Logit. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 43, 2007, pp. 610–623.
36.
HensherD.A., RoseJ.M., and GreeneW. H.Combining RP and SP data: Biases in Using the Nested Logit ‘Trick’—Contrasts with Flexible Mixed Logit Incorporating Panel and Scale Effects. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 126–133.
37.
HensherD.A., RoseJ.M., and GreeneW. H.Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2005.
38.
BhatC. R.Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 837–855.
39.
ReveltD., and TrainK.Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, 1998, pp. 647–657.
40.
TrainK. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2003.
41.
BhatC. R.Quasi-Random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 677–693.
42.
HensherD. A.The Valuation of Commuter Travel Time Savings for Car Drivers: Evaluating Alternative Model Specifications. Transportation, Vol. 28, 2001, pp. 101–118.
