Safety Evaluation of Geometric Design Criteria for Spacing of Entrance–Exit Ramp Sequence and Use of Auxiliary Lanes

Abstract

Geometric design decisions regarding interchange and ramp spacing on freeways have traditionally taken a nominal approach to safety. This approach oversimplifies driver behavior and complex interactions between roadway geometrics, traffic operations, and safety and tends to promote a one-size-fits-all approach to evaluating design alternatives. The objective of this paper was to quantify the relationship between ramp spacing and freeway safety. Data for this study included freeway geometric features, traffic characteristics, and crash counts for 404 freeway segments in California and Washington State. A negative binomial regression modeling approach was used to explore the relationship between ramp spacing and safety. Results indicated that expected crash frequency increased as ramp spacing decreased. The expected proportion of crashes resulting in a fatality or injury appeared to decrease as ramp spacing decreased. The presence of an auxiliary lane was associated with a lower expected frequency of crashes for any given ramp spacing; the safety benefits of providing an auxiliary lane diminished as ramp spacing increased. The model results related to ramp spacing and the presence of an auxiliary lane were transformed into crash modification factors and validated through comparisons with an independent research study on weaving areas in Texas. The safety findings were generally consistent with current Green Book design criteria related to ramp spacing and the presence of an auxiliary lane. The ability to quantify the expected impact on safety of ramp spacing associated with new or modified interchanges will assist transportation agencies in making well-informed assessments of the overall benefits, impacts, and costs of freeway access decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Leisch

J.P.

, and Mason

J.M.

Freeway and Interchange Geometric Design Handbook. ITE, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.

Highway Safety Manual, First Edition. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Ray

B.L.

, Schoen

, Jenior

, Knudsen

, Porter

R. J.

, Leisch

J.P.

, Mason

J.M.

, and Roess

NCHRP Web-Only Document 169: Determining Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.

A Policy on Grade Separations for Intersecting Highways. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1944.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1954.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Urban Highways and Arterial Streets. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1957.

10.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1965.

11.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Urban Highways and Arterial Streets. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1973.

12.

Leisch

J. E.

Application of Human Factors in Highway Design. Presented at Region 2 AASHTO Operating Committee on Design, Mobile, Alabama, 1975.

13.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1984.

14.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1990.

15.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.

16.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.

17.

Torbic

D.J.

, Harwood

D. W.

, Gilmore

D.K.

, Richard

K.R.

, and Bared

J.G.

. Safety Analysis of Interchanges. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2092, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 39–47.

18.

Kiattikomol

, Chatterjee

, Hummer

J. E.

, and Younger

M. S.

Planning Level Regression Models for Prediction of Crashes on Interchange and Noninterchange Segments of Urban Freeways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 3, 2008, pp. 111–117.

19.

Twomey

J.M.

, Heckman

M. L.

, and Hayward

J. C.

Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Features, Volume IV: Interchanges. Publication FHWA-RD-91-047. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.

20.

Abdel-Aty

, Pemmanaboina

, and Hsia

Assessing Crash Occurrence on Urban Freeways by Applying a System of Interrelated Equations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1953, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1–9.

21.

Donnell

E.T.

, and Mason

J.M.

Predicting the Frequency of Median Barrier Crashes on Pennsylvania Interstate Highways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 590–599.

22.

Kraus

J.F.

, Anderson

C. L.

, Arzemanian

, Salatka

, Hemyari

, and Sun

Epidemiological Aspects of Fatal and Severe Injury Urban Freeway Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1993, pp. 229–239.

23.

Hadi

M.A.

, Aruldhas

, Chow

L.-F.

, and Wattleworth

J. A.

. Estimating Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Various Highway Types Using Negative Binomial Regression. In Transportation Research Record 1500, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 169–177.

24.

Milton

J.C.

, Shankar

V. N.

, and Mannering

F. L.

Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 260–266.

25.

Anastasopoulos

P.C.

, Tarko

A. P.

, and Mannering

F. L.

Tobit Analysis of Vehicle Accident Rates on Interstate Highways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 768–775.

26.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

27.

Cirillo

J. A.

The Relationship of Accidents to Length of Speed-Change Lanes and Weaving Areas on Interstate Highways. In Highway Research Record 312, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1970, pp. 17–32.

28.

Bared

J.G.

, Edara

P. K.

, and Kim

Safety Impact of Interchange Spacing on Urban Freeways. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.

29.

Bonneson

J.A.

, and Pratt

M.P.

Calibration Factors Handbook: Safety Prediction Models Calibrated with Texas Highway System Data. Publication FHWA/TX-08/0-4703-5. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2008.

30.

Jovanis

P.P.

, and Chang

H.-L.

. Modeling the Relationship of Accidents to Miles Traveled. In Transportation Research Record 1068, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 42–51.

31.

Miaou

S.-P.

The Relationship Between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design of Road Sections: Poisson Versus Negative Binomial Regressions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1994, pp. 471–482.