Simplified Model for Pedestrian–Vehicle Interactions at Road Crossings Based on Discrete Events System

Abstract

Road accident reports show that many accidents involve pedestrians, the category of road users generally considered “weak” with respect to other mobility users, and that these accidents occur at pedestrian crossings. Therefore, traffic engineers need simulation tools that can forecast the results of a given design solution and compare the solution with alternatives. A simplified model that simulates interactions between pedestrians and vehicles at road crossings is presented. In the model, the crossing process is represented as a discrete events system, and the model uses basic and easy-to-collect parameters to estimate interactions. Pedestrian behavior in the decision phase is characterized with a gap acceptance criterion, which is based on parameters derived from probabilistic distribution and takes into account the heterogeneity of the pedestrian population. Interaction between pedestrians during the crossing phase is taken into account with a cellular model of the crossing area. The model allows estimation of safety benefits for pedestrians and crossing level of service for both pedestrians and vehicular flows, starting from site geometry and field measurements of flow parameters of pedestrians and vehicles. The model was applied to a real site in a case study. The effects of traffic-calming interventions were also simulated and evaluated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pedestrian Crossings Survey in Europe. EuroTest, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.

NGSIM Task E.3: High-Level Data Plan. FHWA-HOP-06-0111. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.

Yannis

, Golias

, and Papadimitriou

Modeling Crossing Behavior and Accident Risk of Pedestrians. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2007, pp. 634–644.

Daamen

, and Hoogendoorn

S.P.

Experimental Research of Pedestrian Walking Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 20–30.

Hoogendoorn

S.P.

, and Daamen

Extracting Microscopic Pedestrian Characteristics from Video Data. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Daamen

, and Hoogendoorn

S.P.

Controlled Experiments to Derive Walking Behaviour. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 39–59.

Yang

, Deng

, Wang

, Li

, and Wang

Modeling Pedestrians Road Crossing Behavior in Traffic system micro-simulation in China. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 280–290.

Manuszac

, Manski

, and Das

Walk or Wait? An Empirical Analysis of Street Crossing Decisions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 20, 2005, pp. 529–548.

Teknomo

, Takeyama

, and Inamura

Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model to Evaluate “Lane-Like Segregation” of Pedestrian Crossing. Proc., Infrastructure Planning Conference, Vol. 24, 2001.

10.

Sun

, Ukkusuri

, Benekohal

R. F.

, and Waller

S. T.

Modeling of Motorist-Pedestrian Interaction at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Crossings. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

11.

Wan

, and Rouphail

N.M.

Using Arena for Simulation of Pedestrian Crossing in Roundabout Areas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 58–65.

12.

Hughes

, Harkey

, Rouphail

, Wan

, and Chae

Evaluation and Application of Pedestrian Modeling Capabilities Using Simulation Computer. Western Michigan University, 2002.

13.

NGSIM Task E.1: Core Algorithm Assessment. FHWA-HOP-06-0009. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.

14.

Raghavachari

, Badrinath

K. M.

, and Murthy

P. R. B.

Simulation of Uncontrolled Urban Intersections with Pedestrian Crossings. Indian Road Congress Highway Research Bulletin, Vol. 48, 1993, pp. 29–49.

15.

Ottomanelli

, and Iannucci

Modeling Pedestrian Crossing Performances Through Discrete Events Based Simulation. Proc., ITS–ILS 2007 International Conference, Krakow, Poland, 2007.

16.

Ottomanelli

, Iannucci

, Caggiani

, and Sassanelli

An Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for Simulation of Pedestrians Behaviour at Unsignalized Roadway Crossings. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Vol. 75, 2010, pp. 255–262.

17.

Venkatesan

, Gowri

, and Sivanandan

Development of Microscopic Simulation Model for Heterogeneous Traffic Using Object Oriented Programming. Transportmetrica, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2008, pp. 227–247.

18.

Lafore

Object Oriented Programming in C++. Waite Group Press, 1995.

19.

Booch

Object Oriented Analysis and Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1994.

20.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

21.

Chu

, and Baltes

M.R.

Pedestrian Mid-block Crossing Difficulty. Center for Urban Transportation Research, Tampa, Fla., 2001.

22.

Kirchner

, and Schadschneider

Simulation of Evacuation Processes Using a Bionics-Inspired Cellular Automaton Model for Pedestrian Dynamics. Physica A, Vol. 312, 2002, pp. 260–276.

23.

Dunn

, and Petty

Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossings: An Examination of Delay. In Proc., 12th Annual Australian Road Research Board Conference, Hobart, Tasmania, 1984.

24.

Fitzpatrick

, Turner

, and Brewer

M.A.

NCHRP Report 562: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006.