Evaluation of Effects of Car Ownership Policies in Chinese Megacities

Abstract

At the beginning of the catching-up phenomenon of personal motorization in China, two very different car ownership policies were implemented in megacities: Beijing adopted a no intervention policy and Shanghai adopted a license quota policy. This difference provides an opportunity to examine policy impacts on car ownership and usage. The effects of the two policies on car ownership levels and delays in the process of personal motorization were examined. The growth pattern of car ownership without intervention was estimated on the basis of city-level aggregate data and a principal component analysis. The results indicate that an increase in income is the dominant factor driving the growth of car ownership in China. The forecast result in Shanghai indicates that the limitation policy has suppressed car ownership by at least twice as many individuals as the number of individuals who actually own cars. The limited car ownership policy also delays the process of personal motorization; this delay provides authorities with more time and chances to improve alternative transport services to fill the demand for motorized travel. The practical experience in Shanghai and public attitude responses in Beijing emphasize the importance of supporting measures to complement the limited car ownership policy and the need to offer equitable car ownership opportunities for all groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dargay

, and Gately

Income's Effect on Car and Vehicle Ownership Worldwide: 1960–2015. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 101–138.

China Statistical Yearbook 2010. National Bureau of Statistics of China, China Statistics Press, Beijing. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2010/indexch.htm. Accessed July 20, 2011.

Deng

Private Car Ownership in China: How Important Is the Effect of Income? Annual Conference of Economists, Hobart, Australia, 2007.

Button

, Ngoe

, and Hine

J.L.

Modelling Vehicle Ownership and Use in Low-Income Countries. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1993, pp. 51–67.

Zhang

, Chen

, and Li

Trip Rate and Travel Time: Perspective in China Cities. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.

De Jong

, Fox

, and Daly

Comparison of Car Ownership Models. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2004, pp. 379–408.

, Walker

J. L.

, Srinivasan

, and Anderson

W.P.

Modeling Private Car Ownership in China: Investigation of Urban Form Impact Across Megacities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2193, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 76–84.

Ogut

K. S.

S-Curve Models to Determine Car Ownership in Turkey. ARI: Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1–5.

Dargay

Vehicle Ownership to 2015: Implications for Energy Use and Emissions. Energy Policy, Vol. 25, No. 14–15, 1997, pp. 1121–1127.

10.

Berri

A Cross-Country Comparison of Household Car Ownership: A Cohort Analysis. IATSS Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2009, pp. 21–38.

11.

De Jong

G. C.

, and Kitamura

A Review of Household Dynamic Vehicle Ownership Models: Holdings Models Versus Transactions Models. Transportation, Vol. 36, 2009, pp. 733–743.

12.

Kitamura

, and Bunch

D.S.

Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Household Car Ownership: A Panel Analysis Using Ordered-Response Probit Models with Error Components. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1989.

13.

Kitamura

A Dynamic Model System of Household Car Ownership, Trip Generation, and Modal Split: Model Development and Simulation Experiment. Transportation, Vol. 36, 2009, pp. 711–732.

14.

Giuliano

, and Dargay

Car Ownership, Travel and Land Use: A Comparison of the U.S. and Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 106–124.

15.

Crockett

, and Whelan

A New Model of Car Ownership in London: Geo-Spatial Analysis of Policy Interventions. European Transport Conference 2010, Glasgow, Scotland, 2010.

16.

Hanly

, and Dargay

J.M.

Car Ownership in Great Britain: Panel Data Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1718, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 83–89.

17.

Woldeamanuel

M.G.

, Cyganski

, and Schulz

Variation of Households’ Car Ownership Across Time: Application of a Panel Data Model. Transportation, Vol. 36, 2009, pp. 371–387.

18.

Dargay

, and Hanly

Volatility of Car Ownership, Commuting Mode and Time in the UK. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 934–948.

19.

Phang

S.-Y.

An Evaluation of Car-Ownership and Car-Usage Policies in Singapore. In Research Collection, School of Economics, Singapore, 1990.

20.

Phang

S.-Y.

, Wong

W.-K.

, and Chia

N.-C.

Singapore's Experience with Car Quotas: Issues and Policy Processes. Transport Policy, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1996, pp. 145–153.

21.

Liu

, and Guan

C.-Q.

Mode Biases of Urban Transportation Policies in China and Their Implications. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 131, No. 2, 2005, pp. 58–70.