Evaluation of Wheat Straw Wattles for Velocity Reduction in Ditch Check Installations

Abstract

Linear construction typically uses drainage conveyances to convey storm-water runoff away from construction sites to neighboring water bodies. These conveyances may be unstabilized and highly susceptible to erosive shear stresses associated with high-velocity flow. In certain situations, wattle ditch checks are used to help reduce channel erosion caused by high-velocity flow by creating an impoundment. However, with new technology emerging and limited scientific data available on the in-field performance of wattles, the quantification of an installation's effectiveness for improving runoff control is difficult. The effectiveness of various configurations of wattle ditch check installations was investigated at the Auburn University Erosion and Sediment Control Testing Facility to help the Alabama Department of Transportation (DOT) improve the performance of wattle ditch checks. Results indicate that Alabama DOT's current installation practice of staking a wattle only to an unstabilized channel can be improved. The addition of a filter fabric underlay protects the channel bottom from scour at the installation area, and the use of sod staples coupled with a teepee staking pattern secures the wattle in place and increases ground contact, which reduces undercutting. This configuration ultimately minimizes highly erosive supercritical flows and maximizes the subcritical flow length by 99% compared with the base installation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASCE Manuals and Reports of Engineering Practice No. 77: Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems. WEF Manual of Practice FD-20. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1992.

Novotny

Water Quality: Diffuse Pollution and Watershed Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.

Menu of BMPs: Check Dams. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., May 24, 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index.cfm. Accessed Feb. 9, 2012.

ESC-300 Ditch Check Structures, Typical Applications, and Details. Alabama Department of Transportation, Montgomery, 2012.

Temporary Rock Silt Check Type B Specification, Erosion Control and Roadside Development. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, 2012.

Sediment and Erosion Control Processes, Principles, and Practices. In Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control in Georgia. Georgia Water and Soil Conservation Commission, Athens, Ga., 2000, pp. 2-1–2-10.

McEnroe

B. M.

, and Treff

B. J.

Performance of KDOT Temporary Erosion Control Measures. Final Report. K-TRAN Report KU-97-2. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 1997.

McLaughlin

R. A.

, Rajbhandari

, Hunt

W. F.

, Line

D. E.

, Sheffield

R. E.

, and White

N. M.

The Sediment and Erosion Control Research and Education Facility at North Carolina State University. In Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century ( Ascough

J. C.

II , and Flanagan

D. C.

, eds.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 2001.

McLaughlin

R. A.

, King

S. E.

, and Jennings

G. D.

Improving Construction Site Runoff Quality with Fiber Check Dams and Polyacrylamide. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2009, pp. 144–154.

10.

Wattle Detail, Roadside and Environmental Unit. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, 2012.

11.

Curlex Sediment Logs Ditch/Channel Application Detail. Technical Support Library. Earth Science Division, American Excelsior Company, Arlington, Tex., 2003. http://www.americanexcelsior.com/erosioncontrol/library/CAD%20Details/Curlex%20Sediment%20Logs%20Channel.PDF. Accessed July 30, 2012.