Taxicabs are one of the least-studied urban transportation modes, especially in developing countries. In Bogotá, Colombia, in 1998, innovative policies intended to transform a car-centered transportation system into a people-oriented one were implemented. The high number of taxis circulating in Bogotá and the absence of any type of comprehensive report led to more investigation of this mode, specifically, its role in urban transportation. Results of a survey of 389 drivers are presented. It is concluded that this mode of transport is important and deserves to be studied more in depth. This system provides 59,000 direct jobs, collects 2.5 times more in fares than does the bus rapid transit TransMilenio, emits 3,000 tons of carbon dioxide daily, has a major impact on congestion, and is one of the least expensive taxicab systems in the world. Also discussed is the convenience of having inexpensive taxi service and its implications in sustainability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
YangH., LauY., WongS. C., and LoH.A Macroscopic Taxi Model for Passenger Demand, Taxi Utilization and Level of Services. Transportation, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2000, pp. 317–340.
2.
GoliasJ.Examining Sensitivity of Impact of Taxi Traffic on Capacity and Delays at Urban Road Sections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 3, 2003, pp. 286–291.
3.
KirbyR., and MillerG. K.Some Promising Innovations in Taxicab Operations. Transportation, Vol. 4, 1974, pp. 369–386.
4.
OlatunbosunB.A Comparison of Taxicab Driver's Perception of Two Dispatch Technology Systems Operation in Western Pennsylvania. PhD dissertation. Robert Morris University, Moon Township, Pa., 2006.
5.
KimK., and GallentN.Transport Issues and Policies in Seoul: An Exploration. Transport Reviews, Vol. 18, 1998, pp. 83–99.
6.
DarbéraR.Taxicab Regulation and the Evolution of Communication Technology: The Tale of Three Cities.Association for European Transport and Contributors, Henley-in-Arden, United Kingdom, 2005.
7.
National Household Travel Survey.U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
8.
YangH., and WongS. C.A Network Model of Urban Taxi Services. Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 235–246.
9.
Sheriff-DeenA.The Menace of Motorcycle as a Paratransit Mode in Lagos Metropolis. Journal of Estate Surveying Research, Vol. 3, 2010, pp. 64–79.
10.
AcevedoJ., BocarejoJ. P., EcheverryJ. C., LlerasG. C., OspinaG., and Rodriguez-ValenciaA.El transporte como soporte al desarrollo de Colombia: Una visión al 2040.Ediciones Uniandes, Bogotá, Colombia, 2009.
11.
OrrD.The “Taxicab Problem”: A Proposed Solution. Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 77, 1969, pp. 141–147.
12.
SchreiberC.The Economic Reasons for Price and Entry Regulation of Taxicabs. Journal of Transportation Economy and Policy, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1975, pp. 268–293.
13.
CoffmanR. B.The Economic Reason for Price and Entry Regulation of Taxicabs. Journal of Transportation Economy and Policy, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1977, pp. 288–297.
14.
FrankenaM., and PautlerP.An Economic Analysis of Taxicab Regulation. Bureau of Economics Staff Report, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 1984.
15.
TonerJ., and MackieP. J.The Economics of Taxicab Regulation: A Welfare Assessment. Proc., 6th World Conference on Transport Research (World Conference on Transport Research Society, ed.), Lyon, France, 1992.
16.
CairnsR., and Liston-HeyesC.Competition and Regulation in the Taxi Industry. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 59, 1996, pp. 1–15.
17.
RouwendalJ., MeursH., and JorritsmaP.Deregulation of the Dutch Taxi Sector. Public Transport Planning and Operations, Proc., Seminar F, European Transport Conference, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, Sept. 14–18, 1998, pp. 37–49.
18.
BekkenJ. T., and LongvaF.Impact of Taxi Market Regulation: An International Comparison.UK Office of Fair Trading. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2003.
19.
SchallerB.Entry Controls in Taxi Regulation: Implications of US and Canadian Experience for Taxi Regulation and Deregulation. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 490–506.
20.
SongL., ZhangD., ChenJ., AnJ., and SuY.Analysis of Taxi Operation Characteristics with Traffic Control. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2008, pp. 127–131.
21.
LiuL., AndrisC., and RattiC.Uncovering Cabdrivers’ Behavior Patterns from Their Digital Traces. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 34, 2010, pp. 541–548.
22.
DarbéraR.Taxicab Regulation and Urban Residents’ Use and Perception of Taxi Services: A Survey in Eight Cities. 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
23.
QuijanoJ. P., and Rodriguez-ValenciaA.Cuantificación de externalidades causadas por taxis en Bogotá a partir de un estudio de caracterización del sistema. XVI Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Mexico D.F., Mexico, Oct. 6–8, 2010.
24.
ArdilaA., and MenckhoffG.Transportation Policies in Bogotá, Colombia. Building a Transportation System for the People. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 130–136.
25.
AlfonsoA.Ciudad y Región en Colombia. Bogotá, la ocupación del suelo a largo Plazo.Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, 2001.
26.
DANE—Statistic National Agency of Colombia. Proyecciones nacionales y departamentales de población.www.dane.gov.co. Accessed April 15, 2011.
27.
Comerce Chamber of Bogotá. Comportamiento de los indicadores de movilidad de la ciudad a diciembre de 2009.Observatorio de Movilidad. Issue 5. Bogotá, Colombia, 2010.
28.
JoumardR., LambertJ., LamureC., and TripianaF.Air Quality and Urban Space Management. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 189–190, 1996, pp. 57–67.
29.
SkokW., and BairdS.Strategic Use of Emerging Technology: The London Taxi Cab Industry. Strategic Change, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2005, pp. 295–306.
30.
Encuesta de Movilidad. Secretaria Distrital de Movilidad de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia, 2005.
31.
HenryG.Practical Sampling.Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 21. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, Calif., 1990.
32.
KrauseN., RaglandD., GreinerB., SymeL., and FisherJ.Psycho-social Job Factors Associated with Back and Neck Pain in Public Transit Operators. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health, Vol. 23, 1997, pp. 179–186.
33.
DalzielJ. R., and JobR. F. S.Motor Vehicle Accidents, Fatigue and Optimism Bias in Taxi Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1997, pp. 489–494.
34.
Rodriguez-ValenciaA., and QuijanoJ. P.Taxi Cab Characterization in Bogotá, Colombia, and Methodology of Data Acquisition (in Spanish). XVI Pan-American Conference of Traffic and Transportation, Engineering and Logistics, Lisbon, Portugal, July 15–18, 2010.
35.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados. Análisis de Tránsito y ocupación devehículos particulares corredor carrera Séptima, Bogotá, Colombia, 2009.
36.
WongK. I., WongS. C., and YangH.Modeling Urban Taxi Services in Congested Road Networks with Elastic Demand. Transportation Research B, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 819–842.
