Operational Effectiveness of Passing Zones Depending on Length and Traffic Volume

Abstract

Most studies on two-lane highway operations have focused on the percentage of following vehicles or the adjustment of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedure to local data. The HCM proposes the length of no-passing zones as a model parameter; however, the distribution and characteristics of passing zones are not addressed. In fact, only a few studies on the expected number of passes in a passing zone have been carried out. This research presents an analysis of the effectiveness of passing zones in terms of their length and traffic volume. Data were collected from four passing zones on a rural highway in Spain. The two-way traffic volumes ranged from 100 to 900 vehicles per hour (vph), and the passing zone lengths ranged from 265 to 1,270 m. More than 1,600 passing maneuvers were recorded. The operational effectiveness of the passing zones was obtained from the passing frequency and the passing rate. The results indicated that the longer the passing zone, the higher the passing frequency; however, the results stabilized with lengths above 1,100 m. Balanced flows with two-way traffic volumes between 600 and 700 vph optimized the number of passes. Nevertheless, the increase in the passing frequency with the traffic volume was lower than with the increase in following vehicles. The results were validated with data from another 12 passing zones. Finally, HCM adjustments based on the percentage of no-passing zones did not reliably represent the effectiveness of passing zones. Therefore, the effectiveness of every passing zone should be considered, and adjustment factors should be modified to maximize the passing opportunities for traffic volumes between 600 and 700 vph.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Romana

M. G.

Passing Activity on Two-Lane Highways in Spain. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1678, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 90–95.

Molinero

, Carter

, Naing

, Simon

M. C.

, and Hermitte

Part 1: Overview and General Statistics, Accident Causation and Pre-Accidental Driving Situations. Internal report. Traffic Accident Causation in Europe, Paris, 2008.

Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Al-Kaisy

, and Freedman

Estimating Performance on Two-Lane Highways: Case Study Validation of a New Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2173, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 72–79.

Al-Kaisy

, and Karjala

Car-Following Interaction and the Definition of Free-Moving Vehicles on Two-Lane Rural Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 10, 2010, pp. 925–931.

Al-Kaisy

, and Durbin

Platooning on Two-Lane Two-Way Highways: An Empirical Investigation. Procedia and Behavioral Sciences, No. 16, 2011, pp. 329–339.

Gattis

J. L.

, Alguirre

M. S.

, Townsend

, and Rao

Rural Two-Lane Passing Headways and Platooning. In Transportation Research Record 1579, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 27–34.

Dixon

M. P.

, Sarepali

S. S. K.

, and Young

K. A.

Field Evaluation of Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Analysis Procedures for Two-Lane Highways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 125–132.

Polus

, and Cohen

Theoretical and Empirical Relationships for the Quality of Flow and for a New Level of Service on Two-Lane Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 6, 2009, pp. 380–385.

10.

Rozenshtein

, Polus

, and Cohen

Models for Estimating Drivers Following on Two-Lane Rural Highways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2286, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 68–75.

11.

Al-Kaisy

, and Durbin

Evaluating New Methodologies for Estimating Performance on Two-Lane Highways. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, 2008, pp. 777–785.

12.

Tapio Luttinen

Level of Service on Finnish Two-Lane Highways. Proc., Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Maui, Hawaii, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 175–188.

13.

Romana

, and López

Estimación del Porcentaje de Vehículos Demorados en Función de las Variables de la Circulación en Carreteras Convencionales de Doble Sentido. Revista de Obras Públicas, Vol. 3359, 1996, pp. 85–93.

14.

Romana

Evaluación Práctica de Niveles de Servicio de Carreteras Convencionales de dos Carriles en España. Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas, Madrid, Spain, 1997.

15.

Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.

16.

Messer

C. J.

Two Lane, Two Way Rural Highway Capacity. NCHRP Project 3-28A final report. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983.

17.

Luttinen

Uncertainty in the Operational Analysis of Two-lane Highways. TL Consulting Engineers, Lahti, Finland, 2001.

18.

Morrall

J. F.

, and Werner

A. I.

Measuring Level of Service of Two-Lane Highways by Overtakings. In Transportation Research Record 1287, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 62–69.

19.

Llorca

, and García

Evaluation of Passing Process on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Spain with New Methodology Based on Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2262, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 42–51.