Effect of Laboratory Mixing and Compaction Temperatures on Asphalt Mixture Volumetrics and Dynamic Modulus

Abstract

Employment of conventional asphalt testing protocols for characterization of polymer-modified asphalts remains a challenge. NCHRP launched Project 9–39 to identify an approach to determine the mixing and compaction temperatures applicable to unmodified and modified asphalt binders. The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Kentucky, in cooperation with FHWA, embarked on the research reported here to evaluate how mixture performance is affected by laboratory mixing and compaction temperatures. Samples were mixed and conditioned at various temperatures and conditioning durations with modified and unmodified binders. Volumetric analysis confirmed that slight changes in the mixing temperature did not change the results of volumetric testing. Compacted samples were tested to determine the dynamic modulus as an indication of pavement performance. A comprehensive statistical analysis was performed, and the overall results showed that the impact of the conditioning temperature and duration on the dynamic modulus was more significant than the influence of the mixing temperature. Further, for modified binders the significance of the impact of the mixing temperature seemed to be a function of the crude source of the binders.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The Asphalt Handbook, MS-4, 7th ed. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Ky., 2007.

Hansley

, and Palmer

Establishing Hot Mix Asphalt Mixing and Compaction Temperature at the Project Level. Asphalt, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1998, pp. 19–23.

Bahia

H. U.

, Hanson

D. I.

, Zeng

, Zhai

, Khatri

M. A.

, and Anderson

R. M.

NCHRP Report 459: Characterization of Modified Asphalt Binders in Superpave Mix Design. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.

West

R. C.

, Watson

D. E.

, Turner

P. A.

, and Casola

J. R.

NCHRP Report 648: Mixing and Compaction Temperatures of Asphalt Binders in Hot-Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Yildirim

, Solaimanian

, and Kennedy

T. W.

Mixing and Compaction Temperatures for Superpave Mixes. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 69, 2000, pp. 34–71.

Kennedy

T. W.

, and Huber

G. A.

Effect of Mixing Temperature and Stockpile Moisture on Asphalt Mixtures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1034, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 35–46.

Bell

C. A.

, AbWahab

, Cristi

M. E.

, and Sosnovske

Selection of Laboratory Aging Procedures for Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures. SHRP-A-383. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Bonaquist

NCHRP Report 691: Mix Design Practices for Warm Mix Asphalt. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.

Bonaquist

R. F.

Simple Performance Tester for Superpave Mix Design, Quarterly Progress Report. NCHRP Project 9–29. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.

10.

Shenoy

, and Romero

Standardized Procedure for Analysis of Dynamic Modulus |E^*| Data to Predict Asphalt Pavement Distresses. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 173–182.

11.

Huner

L. M. H.

, and Brown

E. R.

Effects of Reheating and Compaction Temperature on Hot Mix Asphalt Volumetrics. NCAT Report 01–04. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Ala., 2001.

12.

Huang

Y. H.

, Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2004.