Assessing Disability Glare Potential of Reflections from New Construction

Abstract

Disability glare, or visual impairment due to extreme brightness or contrast, can be caused by intense reflections from new constructions onto existing transportation or building infrastructure located nearby. A case study analyzed a disability glare hazard at an airport created by the installation of a large array of photovoltaic panels between an air traffic control tower and the aircraft taxiway. The panels reflected blinding quantities of daylight into the control tower, produced temporary afterimages, and dangerously obscured taxiing aircraft. The existing FAA guidelines for installation of solar technologies are discussed relative to their shortcomings in identifying the glare hazard. High dynamic range photography was used to analyze the glaring situation at the airport. The authors proposed a maximum brightness threshold of 30,000 cd/m² based on the physiology of human vision and the brightness of tasks necessary for air traffic controllers at the case study airport. Detailed reflectivity and three-dimensional models of the photovoltaic panels and the airport were created and validated against measured data. These models were used to perform an annual analysis of the glare hazard. This analysis is displayed temporally by graphs and spatially by images that indicate where the glaring reflections originate. Such information is useful in identifying potential for disability glare before new constructions are built. Finally, the authors used the new method to analyze designs for remediation of the glare hazard.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. CIE Publication 117, 1995.

Inanici

M. N.

Evaluation of High Dynamic Range Photography as a Luminance Data Acquisition System. Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 123–134.

Boyce

P. R.

Human Factors in Lighting, 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis, Inc., New York, 2003.

Ferwerda

J. A.

, Pattanaik

S. N.

, Shirley

, and Greenberg

A Model of Visual Adaptation for Realistic Image Synthesis. Proc., 23rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, La., 1996, pp. 249–258.

Hopkinson

R. G.

, and Collings

J. B.

The Ergonomics of Lighting. Macdonald & Co., London, 1970.

Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airports, Office of Airport Planning and Programming, Airport Planning and Environmental Division (APP-400). Technical Guidance for Evaluating Selected Solar Technologies on Airports. http://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/policy_guidance/media/airport_solar_guide.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.

C. K.

, Ghanbari

C. M.

, and Diver

R. B.

Methodology to Assess Potential Glint and Glare Hazards from Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Analytical Models and Experimental Validation. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 3, 2011.

C. K.

, and Sims

C. A.

Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Tool (SGHAT) User's Manual v.2A. https://share.sandia.gov/phlux/static/references/glint-glare/SGHAT_Users_Manual_v2-A_final.pdf. Accessed Feb. 2014.

Ward

G. J.

The RADIANCE Lighting Simulation and Rendering System. Proc., 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, Fla., 1994, pp. 459–472.

10.

Reinhart

C. F.

, and Andersen

Development and Validation of a Radiance Model for a Translucent Panel. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2006, pp. 890–904.

11.

Mardaljevic

Validation of a Lighting Simulation Program Under Real Sky Conditions. Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1995, pp. 181–188.

12.

Reinhart

C. F.

, and Walkenhorst

Validation of Dynamic RADIANCE-Based Daylight Simulations for a Test Office with External Blinds. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 33, No. 7, 2001, pp. 683–697.

13.

Reinhart

C. F.

, and Breton

P.-F.

Experimental Validation of Autodesk^® 3ds Max^® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0. Leukos, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2009, pp. 7–35.

14.

Ibarra

, and Reinhart

C. F.

Solar Availability: A Comparison Study of Irradiation Distribution Methods. Proc., Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2011, pp. 2627–2634.

15.

Apian-Bennewitz

, and von der Hardt

Enhancing and Calibrating a Goniophotometer. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 54, No. 1, 1998, pp. 309–322.

16.

PAB Advanced Technologies, Ltd. BME BSDF Data. http://www.pab.eu/gonio-photometer/demodata/bme/ward_metal_ps.anofol606.37.385/index.html. Accessed July 1, 2013.

17.

Ashikhmin

, and Shirley

An Anisotropic Phong BRDF Model. Journal of Graphics Tools, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2000, pp. 25–32.

18.

Ward

What's New in Radiance for 2013. http://www.radiance-online.org/community/workshops/2012-copenhagen/Day2/Ward/RadianceImprovements.pdf. Accessed Jan. 15, 2013.

19.

Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. Spatial Distribution of Daylight–CIE Standard Overcast Sky and Clear Sky. CIE Publication S003. Vienna, Austria, 1996.