Impacts to Transit from Seattle,Washington,Urban Partnership Agreement Program

Abstract

This paper describes the impacts on transit that were observed in the evaluation of the Urban Partnership Agreement in Seattle, Washington. In December 2011, variable tolls were instituted on the SR-520 bridge in Seattle. Transit service frequency was enhanced approximately 11 months before tolling. The Seattle findings compared favorably with other congestion pricing projects across the United States and the world. Ridership across the SR-520 bridge increased 10% after the new service was added. It increased another 14% after tolling. The larger increase that came after tolls was similar to that observed in Stockholm, Sweden, and Minneapolis, Minnesota. Speeds across the bridge increased by 14 to 18 mph. That increase was higher than the increase observed in London but lower than the increase observed in Miami, Florida, and in Minneapolis. In the pretoll survey of SR-520 bus riders, 19% said they were influenced to take transit by the enhanced transit service. An even greater percentage, 55%, said the tolls influenced them to take transit. In Atlanta, Georgia, Miami, and Minneapolis, the percentage of riders influenced by the tolls was 45%, 53%, and 23%, respectively. In the posttoll survey, 57% of riders said the tolls on SR-520 had improved their personal travel. Altogether, these findings reconfirm that congestion pricing can create a tangible incentive to take transit.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Congestion Pricing, a Primer: Overview. Publication FHWA-HOP-08–039. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.

Congestion Charging Central London Impacts Monitoring, Second Annual Report. Transport for London, 2004.

Congestion Charging Central London Impacts Monitoring, Fifth Annual Report. Transport for London, 2007.

Travel in London Key Trends and Developments. Transport for London, 2009.

Hugosson

, Sjöberg

, and Byström

Facts and Results from the Stockholm Trials, Final Version–December 2006. Congestion Charge Secretariat, City of Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.

Chum

G. L.

, and Burris

M. W.

Potential Mode Shift from Transit to Single-Occupancy Vehicles on a High-Occupancy Toll Lane. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2072, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 10–19.

Hardy

Transit Response to Congestion Pricing Opportunities: Policy and Practice in the U.S. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2009, pp. 61–77.

Supernak

, Brownstone

, Golob

, Kaschade

, Kazimi

, and Steffey

I-15 Congestion Pricing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Services: Task 13 Phase II Year Three Overall Report. San Diego State University Foundation, Calif., 2001.

Munnich

L. W.

Jr. , and Buckeye

K. R.

I-394 MnPass High-Occupancy Toll Lanes: Planning and Operational Issues and Outcomes (Lessons Learned in Year 1). In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1996, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 49–57.

10.

Cain

, Van Nostrand

, and Flynn

Impact of Miami, Florida, Urban Partnership Agreement Phase 1A on Transit User Perceptions of I-95 Express Bus Service. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2144, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 44–51.

11.

Pessaro

, Turnbull

K. F.

, and Zimmerman

Impacts to Transit from Variably Priced Toll Lanes: Results from U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Partnership Agreements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2396, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 117–123.