Impact of Design and Construction on Quality,Consistency,and Safety of Traffic Control Plans

Abstract

State departments of transportation (DOTs) develop traffic control plans (TCPs) as part of construction projects. TCPs communicate required traffic control measures to the construction team and help ensure safe travel through construction work zones and a safe environment for construction workers. TCP quality can vary from project to project as a result of many factors, including the process by which the TCP is designed, reviewed, implemented, and inspected; the features and layout of the TCP and roadway; and the communication of the TCP to the constructor. This paper presents a research study conducted to understand how to improve work zone safety performance by improving the TCP design and implementation processes, identifying the TCP and roadway attributes that made TCP implementation challenging, and identifying factors that affected TCP quality and consistency. A sample of 39 construction projects of varying types and sizes was studied with a mixed methods research approach that included a survey of 12 key personnel on each project, a quantitative evaluation of each project's TCP, analysis of project crash data, and an on-site evaluation of the work zone. TCP quality and consistency and worker and motorist safety were found to be higher on projects for which constructability reviews and design peer reviews had been conducted and on projects on which the contractor super intendent and TCP designer had more years of experience and had undergone specialized TCP training. The TCP features found to increase TCP complexity to the greatest extent were multiple traffic control stages, multilane closures, and dense temporary signage.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Work Zone Safety and Mobility. Federal Register, Vol. 69, No. 174, Sept. 9, 2004, pp 54562–54572.

Pratt

S. G.

, Fosbroke

D. E.

, and Marsh

S. M.

Building Safer Highway Work Zones: Measures to Prevent Worker Injuries from Vehicles and Equipment. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001–128. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga., 2001.

South

L. J.

Work Zone Safety: Keep the Message Alive.

The American Transportation Builder, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1998, pp. 10–11.

Antonucci

N. D.

, Bryden

J. E.

, Neumen

T. R.

, Pfefer

, and Slack

NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volume 17: A Guide for Reducing Work Zone Collisions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Stidger

The 11 Best Ways to Improve Work Zone Safety.

Better Roads, July 1990, pp. 20–23.

Work Zone Safety for Drivers. Publication FHWA-SA-O3–012. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Upchurch

Work Zone Accidents in Arizona: An Analysis of Accidents and Selection of Countermeasures. Proc., Institute of Transportation Engineers 2000 District 6 Annual Meeting, San Diego, Calif., June 24–28, 2000.

Connolly

Dump Truck Diligence: Keeping Your Work Zone and Workers Safe.

Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, January–February 2006, pp. 25–28.

Mahoney

K. M.

, Porter

R. J.

, Taylor

D. R.

, Kulakowski

B. T.

, and Ullman

G. L.

NCHRP Report 581: Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.

10.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Oner

Improved Work Zone Design Guidelines and Enhanced Model of Travel Delays in Work Zones. Report No. FHWA/OH-2006/1. Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment, Ohio University, and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.

11.

Schrock

S. D.

, and Maze

T. H.

Evaluation of Rural Interstate Work Zone Traffic Management Plans in Iowa Using Simulation. Proc., Mid-Continent Transportation Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, May 15–16, 2000, pp. 184–188.

12.

Heaslip

, Collura

, and Louisell

Evaluation of Work Zone Design Strategies: Quantifying the Impact of Driver Behavior on Traffic Flow and Safety. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.

13.

Fisher

D. J.

, and Rajan

Automated Constructibility Analysis of Work-Zone Traffic-Control Planning.

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 122, No. 1, 1996, pp. 36–43.

14.

Maze

, Burchett

, and Hochstein

Synthesis of Procedures to Forecast and Monitor Work Zone Safety and Mobility Impacts. Final Report. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, 2005.