California was the first state to legislate a Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program under Assembly Bill 1475 (1999). SR2S funds construction projects that make it safer for children to walk or bicycle to school and encourages a greater number of children to choose these modes of travel for the school commute. The main goal of this project was to assess the long-term impact of program-funded engineering modifications on walking and bicycling levels and safety. Improvements were evaluated with a targeted method to determine the countermeasures that resulted in safety and mode shift. The major results indicated that the safety of pedestrians increased within 250 ft of an infrastructure improvement, such as a sidewalk. There was also evidence of mode shift near improvements. Positive results for safety and mobility, as well as improved data collection for funded programs, should make SR2S programs competitive among other transportation needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LeeS. M., BurgesonC. R., FultonJ. E., and SpainC. G.Physical Education and Physical Activity: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. Journal of School Health, Vol. 77, No. 8, 2007, pp. 435–463.
2.
McDonaldN. C., BrownA. L., MarchettiL. M., and PedrosoM. S.U.S. School Travel, 2009: An Assessment of Trends. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2011, pp. 146–151.
3.
BeckL. F., and GreenspanA. I.Why Don't More Children Walk to School?Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2008, pp. 449–452.
4.
Traffic Safety Facts, 2010 Data. Bicyclists and Other Cyclists. DOT HS 810 986. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
5.
CliftonK. J., and Kreamer-FultsK.An Examination of the Environmental Attributes Associated with Pedestrian–Vehicular Crashes near Public Schools. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 708–715.
6.
CohenD. A., AshwoodS., ScottM., OvertonA., EvensonK. R., VoorheesC. C., Bedimo-RungA., and McKenzieT. L.Proximity to School and Physical Activity Among Middle School Girls: The Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls Study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 118, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1381–1389.
7.
DiGuiseppiC., RobertsI., LiL., and AllenD.Determinants of Car Travel on Daily Journeys to School: Cross Sectional Survey of Primary School Children. British Medical Journal, Vol. 316, 1998, pp. 1426–1428.
8.
MartinS., and CarlsonS.Barriers to Children Walking to or from School: United States, 2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 54, No. 38, 2005, pp. 949–952.
9.
McDonaldN. C.Active Transportation to School: Trends Among U.S. Schoolchildren, 1969–2001. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2007, pp. 509–516.
10.
McDonaldN. C.Critical Factors for Active Transportation to School Among Low-Income and Minority Students: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 341–344.
11.
McMillanT., DayK., BoarnetM., AlfonzoM., and AndersonC.Johnny Walks to School—and Does Jane? Sex Differences in Children's Active Travel to School. Children, Youth and Environments, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2006, pp. 75–89.
12.
McMillanT. E.The Relative Influence of Urban Form on a Child's Travel Mode to School. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007, pp. 69–79.
13.
SchlossbergM., GreeneJ., PhillipsP. P., JohnsonB., and ParkerB.School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2006, pp. 337–346.
14.
TimperioA., BallK., SalmonJ., RobertsR., Giles-CortiB., SimmonsD., BauerL. A., and CrawfordD.Personal, Family, Social, and Environmental Correlates of Active Commuting to School. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 45–51.
15.
YeungJ., WearingS., and HillsA. P.Child Transport Practices and Perceived Barriers in Active Commuting to School. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2008, pp. 895–900.
16.
ZivianiJ., ScottJ., and WadleyD.Walking to School: Incidental Physical Activity in the Daily Occupations of Australian Children. Occupational Therapy International, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1–11.
17.
MartinS. L., LeeS. M., and LowryR.National Prevalence and Correlates of Walking and Bicycling to School. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2007, pp. 98–105.
18.
BoarnetM. G., DayK., AndersonC., McMillanT., and AlfonzoM.California's Safe Routes to School Program: Impacts on Walking, Bicycling, and Pedestrian Safety. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2005, pp. 301–317.
19.
AppleyardB. S.Planning Safe Routes to School: How Will My Child Get to and from School?Planning, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2003, pp. 34–37.
20.
OrensteinM. R., GutierrezN., RiceT. R., CooperJ. F., and RaglandD. R.Safe Routes to School Safety and Mobility Analysis: Report to the California Legislature.University of California, Berkeley, Traffic Safety Center, 2007.
21.
BoarnetM. G., AndersonC., DayK., McMillanT. E., and AlfonzoM.2003. Safe Routes to School: Report to the California Legislature, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003.
22.
BoarnetM. G., AndersonC., DayK., McMillanT. E., and AlfonzoM.Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School Legislation: Urban Form Changes and Children's Active Transportation to School. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 134–140.
23.
MohamedA.-A., LeeC., WangX., NawatheP., KellerJ., KowdlaS., and PrasadH.Identification of Intersections’ Crash Profiles/Patterns.Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2006.
24.
VogtA.Crash Models for Rural Intersections: Four-Lane by Two-Lane Stop-Controlled and Two-Lane by Two-Lane Signalized. Publication FHWA-RD-99-128. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
25.
California Highway Patrol. Statewide Integrated Crash Records System, 2000–2009. http://www.chp.ca.gov/switrs/. Accessed Oct. 2012.
26.
Safe Transportation Research and Education Center. Transportation Injury Mapping System.University of California, Berkeley. http://tims.berkeley.edu/. Accessed Oct. 2012.
27.
DiggleP., HeagertyP., LiangK., and ZegerS.Analysis of Longitudinal Data.Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
28.
Rabe-HeskethS., and SkrondalA.Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd ed. Stata Press, College Station, Tex., 2008.
29.
RothmanK. J., GreenlandS., and LashT. L.Modern Epidemiology.Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa., 2008.
30.
Stata [computer program]. Version 12.0. StataCorp., College Station, Tex., 2012.
Safe Routes to School: Progress in Implementing the Program, but a Comprehensive Plan to Evaluate Program Outcomes Is Needed. GAO-08-789. U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008.
