A methodology is proposed for freight traffic assignment in large-scale road–rail intermodal networks. To obtain the user–equilibrium freight flows, a path-based assignment algorithm (gradient projection) was proposed. The developed methodology was tested on the U.S. intermodal network by using the 2007 freight demand for truck, rail, and road–rail intermodal from the Freight Analysis Framework, Version 3 (FAF3). The results indicate that the proposed methodology's projected flow pattern is similar to the FAF3 assignment. The proposed methodology can be used by transportation planners and decision makers to forecast freight flows and to evaluate strategic network expansion options.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HallR.Handbook of Transportation Science, 2nd ed.Springer, New York, 2003.
2.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Freight Transportation: Global Highlights, 2010.RITA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
3.
StrockoE., SprungM., NguyenL., RickC., and SedorJ.. Freight Facts and Figures 2013. Publication FHWA-HOP-14-004. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
4.
BrownT. A., and HatchA. B.. The Value of Rail Intermodal to the U.S. Economy.American Association of Railroads, Washington, D.C., 2002. www.intermodal.transportation.org/Documents/brown.pdf. Accessed Oct. 28, 2014.
5.
LoweD.Intermodal Freight Transport.Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005.
6.
ChowJ. Y. J., RitchieS. G., and JeongK.. Nonlinear Inverse Optimization for Parameter Estimation of Commodity-Vehicle-Decoupled Freight Assignment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 67, 2014, pp. 71–91.
7.
CrainicT. G., FerlandJ., and RousseauJ.. A Tactical Planning Model for Rail Freight Transportation. Transportation Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1984, pp. 165–184.
8.
GuelatJ., FlorianM., and CrainicT. G.. A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows. Transportation Science, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1990, pp. 25–39.
9.
FrieszT. L., GottfriedJ. A., and MorlokE. K.. A Sequential Shipper–Carrier Network Model for Predicting Freight Flows. Transportation Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1986, pp. 80–91.
10.
FernándezJ. E., De CeaJ., and GiesenR.. A Strategic Model of Freight Operations for Rail Transportation Systems. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2004, pp. 231–260.
11.
AgrawalB. B., and ZiliaskopoulosA.. Shipper–Carrier Dynamic Freight Assignment Model Using a Variational Inequality Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1966, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 60–70.
12.
LoureiroC. F. G., and RalstonB.. Investment Selection Model for Multi-commodity Multimodal Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1522, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 38–46.
13.
KornhauserA. L., and BoddenM.. Network Analysis of Highway and Intermodal Rail–Highway Freight Traffic. In Transportation Research Record 920, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 61–68.
14.
ArnoldP., PeetersD., and ThomasI.. Modelling a Rail/Road Intermodal Transportation System. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2004, pp. 255–270.
15.
MahmassaniH. S., ZhangK., DongJ., LuC.-C., ArcotV. C., and Miller-HooksE.. Dynamic Network Simulation–Assignment Platform for Multiproduct Intermodal Freight Transportation Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2032, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 9–16.
16.
ZhangK., NairR., MahmasanniH. S., Miller-HooksE. D., ArcotV. C., KuoA. Y., DongJ., and LuC.-C.Application and Validation of Dynamic Freight Simulation-Assignment Model to Large–Scale Intermodal Rail Network: Pan-European Case. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2066, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 9–20.
17.
YamadaT., RussB. F., CastroJ., and TaniguchiE.. Designing Multimodal Freight Transport Networks: A Heuristic Approach and Applications. Transportation Science, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 129–143.
18.
ChangT.-S.Best Routes Selection in International Intermodal Networks. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2008, pp. 2877–2891.
19.
HwangT., and OuyangY.. Assignment of Freight Shipment Demand in Congested Rail Networks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2448, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 37–44.
20.
JayakrishnanR., TsaiW. K., PrashkerJ. N., and RajadhyakshaS.. Faster Path-Based Algorithm for Traffic Assignment. In Transportation Research Record 1443, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 75–83.
21.
FrankM., and WolfeP.. An Algorithm for Quadratic Programming. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1–2, 1956, pp. 95–110.
22.
ChenA., LeeD., and JayakrishnanR.. Computational Study of State-of-the-Art Path-Based Traffic Assignment Algorithms. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 59, No. 6, 2002, pp. 509–518.
23.
KruegerH.Parametric Modeling in Rail Capacity Planning. Proc., 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, New York, 1999, Vol. 2, pp. 1194–1200.
24.
LaiY.-C., and BarkanC. P. L.. Enhanced Parametric Railway Capacity Evaluation Tool. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2117, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 33–40.
SouthworthF., DavidsonD., HwangH., PetersonB. E., and ChinS.. The Freight Analysis Framework Version 3 (FAF3): A Description of the FAF3 Regional Database and How It Is Constructed.FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
27.
SheffiY.Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods.Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1985.
28.
BertsekasD. P.On the Goldstein-Levitin-Polyak Gradient Projection Method. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1976, pp. 174–184.
DowlingR., KittelsonW., ZegeerJ., and SkabardonisA.. NCHRP Report 387: Planning Techniques to Estimate Speeds and Service Volumes for Planning Applications.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.
31.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study.Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C., 2007.
32.
StandiferG., and WaltonC. M.. Development of a GIS Model for Intermodal Freight.U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
HwangT.Freight Transportation Demand Modeling and Logistics Planning for Evaluating Air Quality and Climate Impacts of Freight Systems. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill., 2013.
36.
SlackB.Intermodal Transportation in North America and the Development of Inland Load Centers. The Professional Geographer, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1990, pp. 72–83.
MargretaM., FordC., and DipoM. A.. U.S. Freight on the Move: Highlights from the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Preliminary Data. Publication BTS-SR-018. RITA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
