Unpaved roads represent a major component of the roadway network in Iowa and require regular surface grading to control roughness (e.g., corrugation). This paper presents a study that shows how terrestrial laser scanning can characterize road roughness in relation to (a) a spatially analyzed international roughness index (IRI), (b) a fast Fourier transform (FFT) spectral analysis, and (c) surface texture characterization that uses statistical analysis. Algorithms are presented for each of the roughness calculations. The spatial nature of terrestrial laser scanning makes possible the determination of IRI values along any selected path within the scan area. In this study, median IRI values were used to characterize overall road roughness. To characterize the nature of road roughness, FFT was used to decompose the laser scan height spectrum. Examples are presented for unpaved road sections with a relatively smooth surface, a smooth surface with corrugations, an unsystematically rough surface, and an unsystematically rough surface with corrugations. On the basis of the observation that the surface aggregate materials were segregated, selected small regions were studied with a scan with spacing of 0.5-mm points. These scans were filtered and statistically analyzed for variations in height by using root mean square, skewness, and kurtosis parameters. These parameters were studied in relation to the values for particle size index for the surface materials of the three distinct gradations. The algorithms presented will be of value to terrestrial laser scanning users interested in characterizing unpaved roadway conditions.
Archondo-CallaoR.Evaluating Economically Justified Road Works Expenditures on Unpaved Roads in Developing Countries. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1989, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 41–49.
4.
McDonaldT., and SperryR.Evaluation of Mitigation for Safety Concerns on Low-Volume, Unpaved Rural Roads.Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University, Ames, 2013.
5.
OuyangY., and MadanatS.Optimal Scheduling of Rehabilitation Activities for Multiple Pavement Facilities: Exact and Approximate Solutions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2004, pp. 347–365.
6.
GaoH., and ZhangX.A Markov-Based Road Maintenance Optimization Model Considering User Costs. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2013, pp. 451–464.
7.
SayersM. W., and KaramihasS. M.Interpretation of Road Roughness Profile Data.Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1996.
8.
DewanS. A., and SmithR. E.Estimating International Roughness Index from Pavement Distresses to Calculate Vehicle Operating Costs for the San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1816, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 65–72.
9.
FlintschG. W., de LeónE., McGheeK. K., and Al-QadiI. L.Pavement Surface Macrotexture Measurement and Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1860, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 168–177.
HuntingtonG., and KsaibatiK.Implementation Guide for the Management of Unsealed Gravel Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2205, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 189–197.
12.
WalkerD., EntineL., and KummerS.Gravel–PASER Manual: Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating.Wisconsin Transportation Information Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2002.
13.
NamurE., and de SolminihacH. E.Roughness of Unpaved Roads: Estimation and Use as an Intervention Threshold. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2101, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 10–16.
14.
Archondo-CallaoR.Unpaved Roads Roughness Estimation by Subjective Evaluation.World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1999.
15.
SoriaM. H. A., and FonteneleE. B.Field Evaluation of Method for Rating Unsurfaced Road Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1819, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 267–272.
16.
WollJ. H., SurdahlR. W., EverettR., and AndresenR.Road Stabilizer Product Performance: Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge.FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
17.
FernandoE. G., and WalkerR. S.Impact of Changes in Profile Measurement Technology on QA Testing of Pavement Smoothness.Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2013.
18.
FernandoE. G., WalkerR. S., and MikhailM.Comparative Testing of Lasers for Ride Quality Measurement on Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2457, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 19–29.
19.
ZhangC.Monitoring the Condition of Unpaved Roads with Remote Sensing and Other Technology.Geographic Information Science Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University, Brookings, 2009.
20.
BerthelotC. F., PodborochynskiD., StuberE., PrangC. A., and MarjerisonB.Saskatchewan Case Studies of Network and Project Level Applications of a Structural Asset Management System.7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets.Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. http://www.pavementmanagement.org/ICMPfiles/2008067.pdf.
21.
BrownM., MercierS., and ProvencherY.Road Maintenance with Opti-Grade®: Maintaining Road Networks to Achieve the Best Value. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1819, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 282–286.
22.
ZhangC., and ElaksherA.An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Imaging System for 3D Measurement of Unpaved Road Surface Distresses. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2012, pp. 118–129.
23.
AbbasA., KutayM. E., AzariH., and RasmussenR.Three-Dimensional Surface Texture Characterization of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2007, pp. 197–209.
24.
ChangJ.-R., ChangK.-T., and ChenD.-H.Application of 3D Laser Scanning on Measuring Pavement Roughness. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2006, pp. 83–91.
25.
SayersM. W., and KaramihasS. M.Interpretation of Road Roughness Profile Data.Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996.
26.
LiuC., and HermanR.Road Profiles, Vehicle Dynamics, and Human Judgment of Serviceability of Roads: Spectral Frequency Domain Analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 2, 1998, pp. 106–111.
27.
BroughtonS. A., and BryanK. M.Discrete Fourier Analysis and Wavelets: Applications to Signal and Image Processing.John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011.
28.
BlateyronF.The Areal Field Parameters. Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture.Springer, Berlin, 2013, pp. 15–43.
29.
MahgoubH., BennettC., and SelimA.Analysis of Factors Causing Corrugation of Gravel Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2204, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 3–10.
