Evaluating the Correlation Between the Geotechnical Index and the Electromagnetic Properties of Fouled Ballasted Track by a Full-Scale Laboratory Model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016
Evaluating the Correlation Between the Geotechnical Index and the Electromagnetic Properties of Fouled Ballasted Track by a Full-Scale Laboratory Model
To determine the correlation between water content or fouling of a railroad track and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) signals, a full-scale railway track model was designed and constructed at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. A track section was simulated by creating a model consisting of rails and ties placed on a ballast layer on a subballast layer. The model was constructed three times with three fouling percentages. Each model was tested with water-content conditions of dry, field capacity, and two points in between these extremes. Frequency antennae of 450 MHz and 2 GHz were used to evaluate the conditions. The design and construction of the full-scale track in addition to the GPR data analysis and interpretation are presented in this paper. The results show that the dielectric permittivity and frequency spectrum can be used as an indicator of percentage of fouling and water content of a track. In addition, a linear correlation was observed between the percentage of fouling and the water content under field capacity conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SeligE. T., and WatersJ. M.. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. T. Telford, London, 1994.
2.
HanX., and SeligE.. Effects of Fouling on Ballast Settlement. Proc., 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 1997.
3.
IndraratnaB., and SalimW.. Mechanics of Ballasted Rail Tracks: A Geotechnical Perspective. CRC Press, London, 2005.
4.
FortunatoE., PineloA., and FernandesM. M.. Characterization of the Fouled Ballast Layer in the Substructure of a 19th Century Railway Track Under Renewal. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2010, pp. 55–62.
5.
AnbazhaganP., LijunS., BuddhimaI., and CholachatR.. Model Track Studies on Fouled Ballast Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Wave. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 2011, pp. 175–184.
6.
GallagherG., LeiperQ., WilliamsonR., ClarkM., and FordeM.. The Application of Time Domain Ground Penetrating Radar to Evaluate Railway Track Ballast. NDT and E International, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1999, pp. 463–468.
7.
JackR., and JacksonP.. Imaging Attributes of Railway Track Formation and Ballast Using Ground Probing Radar. NDT and E International, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1999, pp. 457–462.
8.
SussmannT. R.Jr., SeligE. T., and HyslipJ. P.. Railway Track Condition Indicators from Ground Penetrating Radar. NDT and E International, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2003, pp. 157–167.
9.
ClarkM., GillespieR., KempT., McCannD., and FordeM.. Electromagnetic Properties of Railway Ballast. NDT and E International, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2001, pp. 305–311.
10.
NarayananR., KumkeC. J., and LiD.. Railroad Track Substructure Monitoring Using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). Rail International, Vol. 32, pp. 28–34, 2001.
11.
HyslipJ. P., SmithS. S., OlhoeftG. R., and SeligE. T.. Assessment of Railway Track Substructure Condition Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Proc. AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association) Annual Conference, Chicago, Ill., October5–8, 2003, pp. 5–7.
12.
RobertsR., RudyJ., Al-QadiI., TutumluerE., and BoyleJ.. Railroad Ballast Fouling Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar. A New Approach Based on Scattering from Voids. Presented at ECNDT 2006, Berlin, Sept.25–29, 2006.
13.
Al-QadiI. L., XieW., RobertsR., and LengZ.. Data Analysis Techniques for GPR Used for Assessing Railroad Ballast in High Radio-Frequency Environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 4, 2010, pp. 392–399.
14.
SilvastM., NurmikoluA., WiljanenB., and LevomakiM.. An Inspection of Railway Ballast Quality Using Ground Penetrating Radar in Finland. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 224, No. 5, 2010, pp. 345–351.
15.
AnbazhaganP., BharathaT., and AmarajeeviG.. Study of Ballast Fouling in Railway Track Formations. Indian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2012, pp. 87–99.
16.
SuL.-J., RujikiatkamjornC., and IndraratnaB.. An Evaluation of Fouled Ballast in a Laboratory Model Track Using Ground Penetrating Radar. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2010, pp. 343–350.
17.
KashaniH. F., HoC. L., OdenC. P., and SmithS. S.. Model Track Studies by Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on Ballast With Different Fouling and Geotechnical PropertiesProc., 2015 Joint Rail Conference, San Jose, Calif., ASME, 2015.
18.
YooT., ChenH., and SeligE.. Railroad Ballast Density Measurement. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1978.
19.
SeligE.Compilation of Field Measurements on Ballast State of Compactness. American Railway Engineering Association, Vol. 90, Bulletin No. 723, 1989, pp. 382–391.
20.
SussmannT. R.Jr. Application of Ground-Penetrating Radar to Railway Track Substructure Maintenance Management. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1999.
21.
HalabeU. B., SotoodehniaA., and KennethR.. Modeling of the Electromagnetic Properties of Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 90, No. 6, 1993.
22.
DanielsD. J.Surface-Penetrating Radar. Electronics and Communication Engineering Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1996, pp. 165–182.
23.
ClarkM., GordonM., and FordeM. C.. Issues over High-Speed Non-Invasive Monitoring of Railway Trackbed. NDT and E International, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2004, pp. 131–139.
24.
SilvastM., LevomäkiM., NurmikoluA., and NoukkaJ.. NDT Techniques in Railway Structure Analysis. Proc., 7th World Congress on Railway Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June4–8, 2006.
25.
ShaoW., BouzerdoumA., PhungS. L., SuL., IndraratnaB., and RujikiatkamjornC.. Automatic Classification of Ground-Penetrating-Radar Signals for Railway-Ballast Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2011, pp. 3961–3972.
26.
Al-QadiI. L., XieW., and RobertsR.. Time-Frequency Approach for Ground Penetrating Radar Data Analysis to Assess Railroad Ballast Condition. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2008, pp. 219–237.
27.
ZhangS. X., ChanL. S., and XiaJ.. The Selection of Field Acquisition Parameters for Dispersion Images from Multichannel Surface Wave Data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 161, No. 1, 2004, pp. 185–201.
