The objectives of this research were to test and validate the feasibility of assessing humped highway–rail crossings for safe passage of vehicles with low ground clearance using lidar data. Collected using an airborne platform, lidar data provide georeferenced spatial information about the shape and surface characteristics of Earth. The suitability of humped highway–rail crossings for use by vehicles with low ground clearance and a long wheelbase is a concern because of the possibility of vehicles getting lodged on rail tracks. While such vehicles usually travel on designated routes, emergencies or highway closures may result in these vehicles traveling on undesignated highways with humped grade crossings. Lidar data and line-of-sight analysis in a geographic information system (GIS) were used to identify potentially problematic grade crossings for certain types of low-ground-clearance vehicles with a long wheelbase. Results of the GIS analysis were validated in the field at actual grade crossings with survey equipment. The main conclusion was that lidar data could be successfully used for identification of highway–rail crossing vehicle hang-up issues.
Railroad/Highway Accident Report—Collision of AMTRAK Train No. 88 with Tractor Lowboy Semitrailer Combination Truck, Rowland, NC, August 25, 1983. Report NTSB/RHR-84/01. National Transportation Safety Board, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1984.
3.
Railroad/Highway Accident Report—Grade Crossing Collision, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) with Coastal Transport Tractor-Semitrailer, Jacksonville, FL, February 5, 1997. Report NTSB/RAB-01-01. National Transportation Safety Board, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
4.
Railroad/Highway Accident Report—Collision Between Metrolink Train 901 and Mercury Transportation, Inc., Tractor-Combination Vehicle at Highway-Railroad Grade Crossing in Glendale, California, January 28, 2000. Report NTSB/HAR-01/02. National Transportation Safety Board, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
5.
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011.
6.
2015 Manual for Railway Engineering. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, Washington, D.C., 2015.
7.
OgdenB. D.Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Handbook. Publication FHWA-SA-07-010. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
8.
SobanjoJ. O.Design Guidelines for Highway Railroad Grade Crossing Profiles in Florida. Final Report. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2006.
9.
EckR. W., and KangS.. Low-Clearance Vehicles at Rail–Highway Grade Crossings: An Overview of the Problem and Potential Solutions. In Transportation Research Record 1327, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 27–35.
10.
EckR. W., and KangS.. Roadway Design Standards to Accommodate Low-Clearance Vehicles (with Discussion and Closure). In Transportation Research Record 1356, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 80–89.
11.
WooldridgeM. D., FambroD. B., BrewerM. A., EngelbrechtR. J., HarryS. R., and ChoH.. Design Guidelines for At-Grade Intersections near Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings. Report FHWA/TX-01/1845-3. Texas Department of Transportation, Dallas, 2000.
12.
FrenchL. J., ClawsonA., and EckR. W.. Development of Design Vehicles for Hang-Up Problem. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1847, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 11–19.
13.
GattisJ. L., GluckJ. S., BarlowJ. M., EckR. W., HeckerW. F., and LevinsonH. S.. NCHRP Report 659: Guide for the Geometric Design of Driveways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
14.
BauerL. A.Passenger Car Overhang and Underclearance as Related to Driveway Profile Design, Part II–Street and Highway Design. Bulletin 195, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1958, pp. 23–29.
15.
MutabaziM., and RussellE. R.. Identification of Hump Highway/Rail Crossings in Kansas. Report K-TRAN:KSU-99-1. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 2003.
16.
TurnerA. K.LIDAR Provides Better DEM Data. GeoWorld, Vol. 13, 2000, pp. 30–31.
17.
HillJ. M., GrahamL. A., HenryR. H., CotterD. M., DingA., and YoungD.. Wide-Area Topographic Mapping and Applications Using Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) Technology. Journal of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 66, No. 8, 2000, pp. 908–960.
18.
WilliamsK., OlsenM. J., RoeG. V., and GlennieC.. Synthesis of Transportation Applications of Mobile LiDAR. Remote Sensing, Vol. 5, No. 9, 2013, pp. 4652–4692.
19.
KhattakA., HallmarkS., and SouleyretteR.. Application of Light Detection and Ranging Technology to Highway Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1836, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 7–15.
20.
FeketeS.Geotechnical Application of Lidar for Geomechanical Characterization in Drill and Blast Tunnels and Representative 3-Dimensional Discontinuum Modeling. MS thesis. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2010.
21.
KemenyJ., and TurneK.. Ground-Based Lidar: Rock Slope Mapping and Assessment. Report FHWA-CFL/TD-08-006. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
22.
ChangJ. C., TsaiM. K., FindleyD. J., and CunninghamC. M.. Infrastructure Investment Protection with LiDAR. Report FHWA/NC/2012-15. North Carolina Department of Transportation Research, Raleigh, 2012.
23.
KhattakA. J., and ShamaylehH.. Highway Safety Assessment Through Geographic Information System-Based Data Visualization. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005, pp. 407–411.
24.
SouleyretteR., HallmarkS., PattnaikS., O’BrienM., and VenezianoD.. Grade and Cross Slope Estimation from LIDAR-Based Surface Models. MTC Project 2001-02. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
25.
CaiH., and RasdorfW.. Modeling Road Centerlines and Predicting Lengths in 3-D Using Lidar Point Cloud and Planimetric Road Centerline Data. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2008, pp. 157–173.
26.
VincentR., and EckerM.. Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Technology Evaluation. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, 2010.
27.
WangT. A., SouleyretteR. R., LauD., and XuP.. Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Roughness Quantitative Measurement Using 3D Technology. In Proceedings of the 2014 Joint Rail Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014, pp. 3–5.
