This paper deals with the derivation of analytical formulas to estimate the effective capacity at freeway merges in a multilane context. The paper extends the findings presented in two previous papers describing studies that were based on the same modeling framework but that were restricted to a single lane on the freeway (or to the analysis of the right lane only). The analytical expression for the one-lane capacity was recursively applied to all lanes. Lane-changing maneuvers (mandatory for the on-ramp vehicles and discretionary for the other vehicles) were divided into two nonoverlapping local merging areas. Discretionary lane changes were transformed into a lane-changing flow by the use of appropriate analytical formulas. These formulas defined a system of equations whose unknowns were the capacity on all lanes and the inserting flow coming from the on-ramp. A sensitivity analysis showed that vehicle acceleration and the truck ratio were the parameters that most influenced the total capacity. The results obtained with the analytical formulas were proven to match the numerical results obtained from a traffic simulator that fully describes vehicle dynamics. Finally, the results provide good estimates in comparison with experimental data for an active merge on the M6 Motorway in the United Kingdom.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NewellG. F.Applications of Queueing Theory, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1982.
2.
DaganzoC.The Cell Transmission Model. Part II. Network Traffic. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1995, pp. 79–93.
3.
Bar-GeraH., and AhnS.. Empirical Macroscopic Evaluation of Freeway Merge-Ratios. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 18, 2010, pp. 457–470.
4.
TroutbeckR. J.The Performance of Uncontrolled Merges Using a Limited Priority Process. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (TaylorM. A. P., ed.), Pergamon, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2002, pp. 463–482.
5.
CassidyM. J., and AhnS.. Driver Turn-Taking Behavior in Congested Freeway Merges. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 140–147.
6.
ReinaP., and AhnS.. Prediction of Merge Ratio Using Lane Flow Distribution. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
7.
YuanK., KnoopV. L., and HoogendoornS.. Capacity Drop: Relationship Between Speed in Congestion and the Queue Discharge Rate. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 72–80.
8.
CassidyM. J., and BertiniR. L.. Some Traffic Features at Freeway Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1999, pp. 25–42.
9.
HallF. L., and Agyemang-DuahK.. Freeway Capacity Drop and the Definition of Capacity. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 91–98.
10.
ElefteriadouL., RoessR. P., and McShaneW. R.. Probabilistic Nature of Breakdown at Freeway Merge Junctions. In Transportation Research Record 1484, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 80–89.
11.
PersaudB., YagarS., and BrownleeR.. Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic. In Transportation Research Record 1634, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 64–69.
12.
ChungK., RudjanakanoknadJ., and CassidyM. J.. Relation Between Traffic Density and Capacity Drop at Three Freeway Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007, pp. 82–95.
13.
SarviM., KuwaharaM., and CederA.. Observing Freeway Ramp Merging Phenomena in Congested Traffic. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007, pp. 145–170.
14.
OhS., and YeoH.. Estimation of Capacity Drop in Highway Merging Sections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2286, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 111–121.
15.
SrivastavaA., and GeroliminisN.. Empirical Observations of Capacity Drop in Freeway Merges with Ramp Control and Integration in a First-Order Model. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 30, 2013, pp. 161–177.
16.
CassidyM. J., and RudjanakanoknadJ.. Increasing Capacity of an Isolated Merge by Metering Its On-Ramp. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2005, pp. 896–913.
17.
LavalJ. A., CassidyM. J., and DaganzoC. F.. Impacts of Lane Changes at On-Ramp Bottlenecks: A Theory and Strategies to Maximize Capacity. In Traffic and Granular Flow ‘05’ (KühneR., PoeschlT., SchadschneiderA., SchreckenbergM., and WolfD., eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp. 577–586.
18.
TreiberM., KestingA., and HelbingD.. Understanding Widely Scattered Traffic Flows, the Capacity Drop, and Platoons as Effects of Variance-Driven Time Gaps. Physical Review E, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2006, pp. 1–10.
19.
LavalJ. A., and DaganzoC. F.. Lane-Changing in Traffic Streams. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2006, pp. 251–264.
20.
CoifmanB., and KimS.. Extended Bottlenecks, the Fundamental Relationship and Capacity Drop. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2011, pp. 980–991.
21.
ChenD., AhnS., LavalJ. A., and ZhengZ.. On the Periodicity of Traffic Oscillations and Capacity Drop: The Role of Driver Characteristics. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 117–136.
22.
CarlsonR. C., PapamichailI., and PapageorgiouM.. Integrated Feedback Ramp Metering and Mainstream Traffic Flow Control on Motorways Using Variable Speed Limits. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 46, 2014, pp. 209–221.
23.
KimS., and CoifmanB.. Driver Relaxation Impacts on Bottleneck Activation, Capacity, and the Fundamental Relationship. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 36, 2013, pp. 564–580.
24.
LeclercqL., LavalJ. A., and ChiabautN.. Capacity Drops at Merges: An Endogenous Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1302–1313.
25.
NewellG. F.A Moving Bottleneck. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1998, pp. 531–537.
26.
LeclercqL., ChanutS., and LesortJ.-B.. Moving Bottlenecks in Lighthill–Whitham–Richards Model: A Unified Theory. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1883, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 3–13.
27.
LighthillM. J., and WhithamJ. B.. On Kinematic Waves. II. A Theory of Traffic Flow in Long Crowded Roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 229, No. 1178, 1955, pp. 317–345.
28.
RichardsP. I.Shockwaves on the Highway. Operations Research, Vol. 4, 1956, pp. 42–51.
29.
LeclercqL., KnoopV. L., MarczakF., and HoogendoornS. P.. Capacity Drops at Merges: New Analytical Investigations. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 62, 2016, pp. 171–181.
30.
DaamenW., LootM., and HoogendoornS. P.. Empirical Analysis of Merging Behavior at Freeway On-Ramp. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2188, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 108–118.
31.
DaganzoC. F.A Variational Formulation of Kinematic Waves: Basic Theory and Complex Boundary Conditions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2005, pp. 187–196.
32.
LavalJ. A., and LeclercqL.. Microscopic Modeling of the Relaxation Phenomenon Using a Macroscopic Lane-Changing Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2008, pp. 511–522.
33.
MarczakF., LeclercqL., and BuissonC.. A Macroscopic Model for Freeway Weaving Sections. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2015, pp. 464–477.
34.
HidasP.Modelling Vehicle Interactions in Microscopic Simulation of Merging and Weaving. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 13, 2015, pp. 37–62.
35.
NewellG. F.A Simplified Car-Following Theory: A Lower Order Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2002, pp. 195–205.
36.
ChiabautN., LeclercqL., BretinT., and BuissonC.. Calibrating the Fundamental Diagram in Congestion: Methods Based on Observations at Consecutive Loop-Detectors. In Proceedings of the IWTDCS Conference, Barcelona, Spain, University of Tokyo, 2008.
