On the basis of data from online location-based social networks, the spatiality of destinations in the context of social networks and the influence of social networks on travelers’ destination choices are explored through check-in behavior. Analysis results show that social relationships play a role in travelers’ destination choices and that distance plays a strong role in social networks and in location choice. Comparison of check-in behavior of travelers in two social networks identified in two metropolitan areas (Chicago, Illinois, and New York City) and examination of interactions in the largest communities in each social network indicate that the denser a social network is, the greater the likelihood that travelers will be influenced by their friends in their choice of destination. However, travelers’ own experiences appear to exert greater influence on their decision making than do friendships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChenY., FreiA., and MahmassaniH. S.. From Personal Attitudes to Public Opinion: Information Diffusion in Social Networks Toward Sustainable Transportation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2430, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 28–37.
2.
RogersE. M.Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, 2003.
3.
GärlingT.Behavioral Assumptions Overlooked in Travel-Choice Modeling. In Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play (deJ., OrtuzarD., HensherD., and Jara-DiazS., eds.), Elsevier Science, Ltd., 1998, pp. 3–18.
4.
GladwellC. Y.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Difference. Little, Brown and Co., New York, 2002.
5.
LeskovecJ., AdamicL. A., and HubermanB. A.. The Dynamics of Viral Marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 5, 2007, pp. 1–39.
6.
ChenR., and MahmassaniH. S.. Travel Time Perception and Learning Mechanisms in Traffic Networks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 209–221.
7.
ChenR., and MahmassaniH. S.. Learning and Risk Attitudes in Route Choice Dynamics. Presented at 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
8.
BrennerT.Decision Making and Exchange of Information. In Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics (SchweitzerF., ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1997, pp. 379–392.
9.
KozukiA. T. C. Y., and MahmassaniH. S.. Information Acquisition and Social Interaction Mechanisms in Opinion Formation and Market Adoption of Transportation Services. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
10.
Ben-AkivaM., and BoccaraB.. Discrete Choice Models with Latent Choice Sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1995, pp. 9–24.
11.
PaezA., and ScottD. M.. Social Influence on Travel Behavior: A Simulation Example of the Decision to Telecommute. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2007, pp. 647–665.
12.
WiltonR. D., PaezA., and ScottD. M.. Why Do You Care What Other People Think? A Qualitative Investigation of Social Influence and Telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2011, pp. 269–282.
13.
FitzpatrickM.Mode Choice with Memory and Social Networks: An Agent-Based Simulation Model. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
14.
DugundjiE. R., and WalkerJ. L.. Discrete Choice with Social and Spatial Network Interdependencies: An Empirical Example Using Mixed Generalized Extreme Value Models with Field and Panel Effects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 70–78.
15.
GoetzkeF.Network Effects in Public Transit Use: Evidence from a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model. Urban Studies, Vol. 45, 2008, pp. 407–417.
16.
AxhausenK. W.Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks, and Their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results. Mobilities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2005, pp. 15–36.
17.
CarrascoJ. A., and MillerE.. Exploring the Propensity to Perform Social Activities: A Social Network Approach. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 463–480.
18.
FukudaD., and MorichiS.. Incorporating Aggregate Behavior in an Individual’s Discrete Choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 313–325.
19.
KamargianniM., Ben-AkivaM., and PolydoropoulouA.. Incorporating Social Interaction into Hybrid Choice Models. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
20.
HorniA., CharyparD., and AxhausenK. W.. Empirically Approaching Destination Choice Set Formation. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
21.
McFaddenD.Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Transportation Research Record 673, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 72–77.
22.
PellegriniP. A., FotheringhamA. S., and LinG.. An Empirical Evaluation of Parameter Sensitivity to Choice Set Definition in Shopping Destination Choice Models. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1997, pp. 257–284.
23.
Hoogendoorn-LanserS.Modelling Travel Behaviour in Multi-Modal Networks. Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft, 2005.
24.
ChoE., MyersS. A., and LeskovecJ.. Friendship and Mobility: User Movement in Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011, pp. 1082–1090.
25.
ScellatoS., NoulasA., LambiotteR., and MascoloC.. Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 329–336.
26.
OrtuzarJ., and WillumsenL. G.. Modelling Transport. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 1994.
27.
FruchtermanT. M., and ReingoldE. M.. Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement. Software: Practice and Experience, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1991, pp. 1129–1164.
28.
NewmanM. E. J., and GirvanM.. Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks. Physical Review E, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2004, 026113.
