Hurricanes Irene and Sandy had a significant impact on New York City; the result was devastating damage to the New York City transportation systems, which took days, even months to recover. This study explored posthurricane recovery patterns of the roadway and subway systems of New York City on the basis of data for taxi trips and for subway turnstile ridership. Both data sets were examples of big data with millions of individual ridership records per month. The spatiotemporal variations of transportation system recovery behavior were investigated by using neighborhood tabulation areas as units of analysis. Recovery curves were estimated for each evacuation zone category to model time-dependent recovery patterns of the roadway and subway systems. The recovery rate for Hurricane Sandy was found to be lower than that for Hurricane Irene. In addition, the results indicate a higher resilience of the road network compared with the subway network. The methodology proposed in this study can be used to evaluate the resilience of transportation systems with respect to natural disasters and the findings can provide government agencies with useful insights into emergency management.
ZimmermanR.Planning Restoration of Vital Infrastructure Services Following Hurricane Sandy: Lessons Learned for Energy and Transportation. Journal of Extreme Events, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2014, p. 1450004.
6.
MTA Bridges & Tunnels continues work to repair and strengthen vital inter-borough vehicle links. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, n.d.http://web.mta.info/sandy/bandt.htm.
7.
HeaslipK., LouisellW., ColluraJ., and Urena SerulleN.. A Sketch Level Method for Assessing Transportation Network Resiliency to Natural Disasters and Man-Made Events. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
8.
BruneauM., ChangS. E., EguchiR. T., LeeG. C., O’RourkeT. D., ReinhornA. M., ShinozukaM., TierneyK., WallaceW. A., and von WinterfeldtD.. A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2003, pp. 733–752.
9.
HeaslipK., LouisellW., and ColluraJ.. A Methodology to Evalute Transportation Resiliency for Regional Networks. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
10.
PantS. B.Transportation Network Resiliency: A Study of Self-annealing. Utah State University, Salt Lake City, 2012.
11.
DonovanB., and WorkD.. Using Coarse GPS Data to Quantify City-Scale Transportation System Resilience to Extreme Events. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
12.
D’LimaM., and MeddaF.. A New Measure of Resilience: An Application to the London Underground. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 35–46.
13.
LiJ., OzbayK., BartinB., IyerS., and CarnegieJ. A.. Empirical Evacuation Response Curve During Hurricane Irene in Cape May County, New Jersey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2376, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 1–10.
14.
LewisD. C.Transportation Planning for Hurricane Evacuations. ITE Journal, 1985, pp. 31–35.
15.
FuH., WilmotC. G., ZhangH., and BakerE. J.. Modeling the Hurricane Evacuation Response Curve. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2022, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 94–102.
16.
TweedieS. W., RowlandJ. R., WalshS. J., RhotenR. P., and HagleP. I.. A Methodology for Estimating Emergency Evacuation Times. Social Science Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1986. pp. 189–204.
17.
CovaT. J., and JohnsonJ. P.. Microsimulation of Neighborhood Evacuations in the Urban-Wildland Interface. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 34, No. 12, 2002, pp. 2211–2230.
HobeikaA. G., and ChangkyunK.. Comparison of Traffic Assignments in Evacuation Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1998, pp. 192–198.
29.
HobeikaA. G.TEDSS—A Software for Evacuating People Around Nuclear Power Stations. Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, 2002, pp. 688–695.
30.
YaziciM. A., OzbayK., and ChienS. I.-J.. Study of Networkwide Impact of Various Demand Generation Methods Under Hurricane Evacuation Conditions. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
31.
YaziciM. A., and OzbayK.. Evacuation Modeling in the United States: Does the Demand Model Choice Matter?Transport Reviews, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2008, pp. 757–779.
