Bayesian Latent Class Safety Performance Function for Identifying Motor Vehicle Crash Black Spots

Abstract

The state of the practice in black spot identification uses safety performance functions based on total crash counts to identify high-risk crash sites. This paper postulates that total crash count is a result of multiple distinct risk-generating processes (RGPs), including geometric characteristics of the road, spatial features of the surrounding environment, and driver behavior factors. However, these multiple sources are ignored in current modeling methodologies that try to explain or predict crash frequencies across sites. Instead, current practice uses models that imply that a single RGP exists. This misspecification may lead to correlation of crashes with incorrect sources of contributing factors (e.g., concluding a crash is predominately caused by a geometric feature when the cause is a behavioral issue), which may ultimately lead to inefficient use of public funds and misidentification of true black spots. This study proposes a latent class model consistent with a multiple risk process theory and investigates the influence this model has on correctly identifying crash black spots. The paper presents the theoretical and corresponding methodological approach in which a Bayesian latent class model is estimated with the assumption that crashes arise from two distinct RGPs, including engineering and unobserved spatial factors. The methodology was applied to state-controlled roads in Queensland, Australia. The results were compared with an empirical Bayesian negative binomial (EB-NB) model. A comparison of goodness-of-fit measures illustrated superiority of the proposed model compared with the NB model. The detection of black spots was improved compared with the EB-NB model. In addition, modeling crashes as the result of two fundamentally separate RGPs reveals more detailed information about unobserved crash causes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Washington

, and Haque

M. M.

. On the Commonly Accepted Assumptions Regarding Observed Motor Vehicle Crash Counts at Transport System Locations. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.

Rumar

The Role of Perceptual and Cognitive Filters in Observed Behavior. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, Springer, New York, 1985, pp. 151–170.

Aguero-Valverde

, and Jovanis

P. P.

. Spatial Analysis of Fatal and Injury Crashes in Pennsylvania. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2006, pp. 618–625.

Mitra

, and Washington

. On the Significance of Omitted Variables in Intersection Crash Modeling. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 49, 2012, pp. 439–448.

Mitra

, Washington

S. P.

, and van Schalkwyk

. Important Omitted Spatial Variables in Safety Models: Understanding Contributing Crash Causes at Intersections. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.

Deacon

J. A.

, Zegeer

C. V.

, and Deen

R. C.

. Identification of Hazardous Rural Highway Locations. In Transportation Research Record 543, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975, pp. 16–33.

Morin

D. A.

Application of Statistical Concepts to Accident Data. In Highway Research Record 188, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1967, pp. 72–79.

Norden

, Orlansky

, and Jacobs

. Application of Statistical Quality-Control Techniques to Analysis of Highway-Accident Data. In Highway Research Record 117, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1956, pp. 17–31.

Hakkert

A. S.

, and Mahalel

. Estimating the Number of Accidents at Intersections from a Knowledge of the Traffic Flows on the Approaches. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1978, pp. 69–79.

10.

Hauer

Empirical Bayes Approach to the Estimation of “Unsafety”: The Multivariate Regression Method. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1992, pp. 457–477.

11.

Miaou

S.-P.

, and Lum

. Modeling Vehicle Accidents and Highway Geometric Design Relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1993, pp. 689–709.

12.

Miaou

S.-P.

, and Lum

. A Statistical Evaluation of the Effects of Highway Geometric Design on Truck Accident Involvements. CONF-930120-2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 1993.

13.

Hauer

On the Estimation of the Expected Number of Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1986, pp. 1–12.

14.

Hauer

Observational Before/After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Emerald Group Publishing, 1997.

15.

Hauer

Identification of Sites with Promise. In Transportation Research Record 1542, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 54–60.

16.

McGuigan

D. R. D.

The Use of Relationships Between Road Accidents and Traffic Flow in “Black-Spot” Identification. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 22, 1981.

17.

McGuigan

D. R. D.

Non-Junction Accident Rates and Their Use in Black-Spot Identification. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1982, pp. 60–65.

18.

Cheng

, and Washington

S. P.

. Experimental Evaluation of Hotspot Identification Methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2005, pp. 870–881.

19.

Elvik

State-of-the-Art Approaches to Road Accident Black Spot Management and Safety Analysis of Road Networks. Transportøkonomisk Institutt, 2007.

20.

Hauer

, Kononov

, Allery

, and Griffith

. Screening the Road Network for Sites with Promise. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 27–32.

21.

Persaud

, Lyon

, and Nguyen

. Empirical Bayes Procedure for Ranking Sites for Safety Investigation by Potential for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 7–12.

22.

Miranda-Moreno

, Fu

, Saccomanno

, and Labbe

. Alternative Risk Models for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–8.

23.

Peng

, Lord

, and Zou

. Applying the Generalized Waring Model for Investigating Sources of Variance in Motor Vehicle Crash Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 20–26.

24.

Washington

, Karlaftis

, and Mannering

. Statistical and Econo-metric Techniques for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, New York, 2003.

25.

Huang

, Chin

H. C.

, and Haque

M. M.

. Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Approaches in Identifying Crash Hot Spots: Naive Ranking, Empirical Bayes, and Full Bayes Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2103, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 32–41.

26.

Cheng

, and Washington

. New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 76–85.