Attitudinal Determinants of Aberrant Driving Behaviors in Pakistan

Abstract

The aberrant behavior of drivers is regarded as the most significant contributory factor to traffic accidents in Pakistan. This research was conducted on the premise that personal attitudes were key determinants of driving behaviors. Consequently, the research attempted to identify the key sociocognitive determinants of aberrant driving. To do this, a quantitative study that used an attitudinal questionnaire (inspired by the theory of planned behavior and a modified driver behavior questionnaire) was conducted in the city of Lahore, Pakistan. The study obtained self-reports of attitudes, norms, perceived control, and opinions of drivers regarding a number of intentional road traffic violations and enforcement. The responses to the statements in the questionnaires were first factor analyzed to identify underlying attitudinal and behavioral constructs. Later, following a cluster analysis technique, the attitudinal constructs were used to classify drivers into four distinct groups: the autonomous, the opportunists, the regulators, and the risk averse. Sociodemographic characteristics and behavioral constructs of these groups were also studied. The results indicated that the behaviors of drivers could be interpreted in relation to their attitudes and were partly influenced by the drivers’ sociodemographic characteristics. Attitudes toward enforcement and compliance with rules specifically appeared to be the strongest determinants of Pakistani drivers’ behavior. In particular, the results indicate that being affluent, female, and a student negatively influenced driving behaviors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shah

S. G.

, Khoumbati

, and Soomro

. The Pattern of Deaths in Road Traffic Crashes in Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2007, pp. 231–239.

Jacobs

G. D.

, and Baguley

C. J.

. Towards a Strategy for Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries. Overseas Centre Paper PA 3089/95. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 3GA, United Kingdom, 1995.

Evans

Traffic Safety and the Driver. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.

Ulleberg

, and Rundmo

. Personality, Attitudes, and Risk Perception as Predictors of Risky Driving Behavior Among Young Drivers. Safety Science, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2003, pp. 427–443.

Parker

Road Safety: What Has Social Psychology to Offer. In Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application ( Rothengatter

and Huguenin

R. D.

, eds.), Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2004.

Glendon

A. I.

Driving Violations Observed: An Australian Study. Ergonomics, Vol. 50, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1159–1182.

Ajzen

Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, 2001, pp. 27–58.

Anable

Complacent Car Addicts or Aspiring Enviromentalists? Identifying Travel Behavior Segments Using Attitude Theory. Transport Policy, Vol. 12, 2005, pp. 65–78.

Iversen

, and Rundmo

. Attitudes Towards Traffic Safety, Driving Behavior, and Accident Involvement Among the Norwegian Public. Ergonomics, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2004, pp. 555–572.

10.

Chorlton

Understanding the Influences on Speed Choice. PhD dissertation. University of Leeds, 2007.

11.

Ward

R. L.

, and Lancaster

R. J.

. International Review of the Individual Factors Contributing to Driving Behaviour and the Implications for Work-Related Road Safety. Behavioral Research in Road Safety: Thirteenth Seminar. Department of Transport, London, United Kingdom, 2003.

12.

Carey

Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology Research. New York Times, Nov. 2, 2011.

13.

Limpanitgul

Methodological Considerations in a Quantitative Study Examining the Relationship Between Job Attitudes and Citizenship Behaviors. Cardiff University, Soreze, France, 2009.

14.

Hair

J. F.

Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2006.

15.

Rowland

, Davey

, Freeman

J. E.

, and Wishart

. Implementation of a Driving Diary Intervention to Reduce Aberrant Driving Behaviors. In Driving Assessment 2009: 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment and Design, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 2009, pp. 447–452.

16.

Batool

, Carsten

, and Jopson

. Road Safety Issues in Pakistan: A Case Study of Lahore. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 31–48.

17.

Parker

, Stradling

S. G.

, and Manstead

A. S. R.

. Modifying Beliefs and Attitudes to Exceeding the Speed Limit: An Intervention Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1–19.

18.

Lawton

, Parker

, Manstead

A. S. R.

, and Stradling

S. G.

. The Role of Affect in Predicting Social Behaviors: The Case of Road Traffic Violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 14, 1887, pp. 1258–1276.

19.

Hatfield

, Fernandes

, Faunce

, and Soames Job

R. F.

. An Implicit Non-Self-Report Measure of Attitudes to Speeding: Development and Validation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2008, pp. 616–627.

20.

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology. Survey: Pakistan Drivers Respect Cameras. http://www.traffictechnologytoday.com/news.php?NewsID=10424. Accessed Nov. 19, 2009.

21.

Tannert

Who Are Better Drivers: Men or Women?

2009. http://cbsqc.blogspot.com/2012/06/who-are-better-drivers-men-or-women.html.

22.

Shinar

, Schechtman

, and Compton

. Self-Reports of Safe Driving Behaviors in Relationship to Sex, Age, Education, and Income in the U.S. Adult Driving Population. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2001, pp. 111–116.

23.

Lourens

P. F.

, Vissers

, and Jesserun

. Annual Mileage, Driving Violations, and Accident Involvement in Relation to Drivers’ Sex, Age, and Level of Education. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1999, pp. 593–597.