The objective of this study was to determine whether the application of transverse rumble strips was an effective warning device for drivers approaching high-speed intersections. Performance was evaluated for attention-getting characteristics, driver speed choice, and braking behavior. Five intersection approaches on US-280 in Alabama were selected and monitored during both daytime and nighttime conditions. Acoustic and tactile signatures were measured by a specially equipped passenger car under different speed ranges. To examine effectiveness on speed changes, vehicle mean speeds were recorded by radar measurements along the approach to the intersections: 400 ft (122 m) upstream of the transverse rumble strips, right before the transverse rumble strips, and right after the transverse rumble strips. Video cameras were also in place to survey the brake lights of vehicles driving over the transverse rumble strips to quantify driver behavior. An analysis of variance F-test and Tukey’s honest significance test revealed that the strips created a recognizable amount of interior noise and vibration when an automobile crossed over the transverse rumble strips. The installation of transverse rumble strips generally produced statistically significant (p ≤ .05) reductions in approach speeds. During daytime and at night, drivers drove at lower speeds through the intersections compared with the initial upstream speed. The transverse rumble strips also exerted certain effects on driver braking behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaharG., ErwinT., MackayM., SmileyA., and TigheS.. Best Practice Guidelines for the Design and Application of Transverse Rumble Strips. Transportation Association of Canada, 2005.
2.
LankC., and SteinauerB.. Increasing Road Safety by Influencing Drivers’ Speed Choice with Sound and Vibration. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2248, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 45–52.
3.
LiuP., HuangJ., WangW., and XuC.. Effects of Transverse Rumble Strips on Safety of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Rural Roads in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 1947–1954.
Guidelines for Application of Rumble Strips. Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration, 2011.
8.
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rumble Strips. Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, 1983.
9.
StaplinL., LococoK., and ByingtonS.. Older Driver Highway Design Handbook. Publication FHWA-RD-97-135. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
10.
HarwoodD. W.NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
11.
Safety Evaluation of Transverse Rumble Strips on Approaches to Stop-Controlled Intersections in Rural Areas. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
12.
WattsG. R.The Development of Rumble Areas as a Driver-Alerting Device. Supplementary Report 291. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K., 1977.
13.
ElefteriadouL., El-GindyM., TorbicD., GarveyP., HomanA., JiangZ., PecheuxB., and TallonR.. Bicycle Tolerable Shoulder Rumble Strips. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, 2000.
14.
MilesJ. D., and FinleyM. D.. Factors That Influence the Effectiveness of Rumble Strip Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2030, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–9.
15.
OutcaltW.Bicycle-Friendly Rumble Strips. Publication CDOT-DTD-R-2001-4. Colorado Department of Transportation and FHWA, 2001.
16.
WaltonS., and MeyerE.. The Effect of Rumble Strip Configuration on Sound and Vibration Levels. ITE Journal, Vol. 72, No. 12, 2002, pp. 28–32.
17.
HorowitzA. J., and NotbohmT.. Testing Temporary Work Zone Rumble Strips. Midwest Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, FHWA Pooled Fund Study, 2005.
18.
SchrockS. D., HeaslipK. P., WangM.-H., JasrotiaR., and RescotR.. Closed-Course Test and Analysis of Vibration and Sound Generated by Temporary Rumble Strips for Short-Term Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2169, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 21–30.
19.
Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Midwest Research Institute Synectics, Inc., and Transportation Research Corporation. NCHRP Web-Only Document 124: Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections: Supplement to NCHRP Report 613. 2008.
20.
KermitM. L., and HeinT. C.. Effect of Rumble Strips on Traffic Control and Drive Behavior. Traffic and Operations, 1962, pp. 469–481.
21.
ShaikN. M., BernhardtK. L. S., and VirklerM. R.. Evaluation of Three Supplementary Traffic Control Measures for Freeway Work Zones. In Mid-Continent Transportation Symposium Proceedings, pp. 51–56.
22.
FitzpatrickK., BrewerM. A., and ParhamA. H.. Left-Turn and In-Lane Rumble Strip Treatments for Rural Intersections. FHWA/TX-04/0-4278-2. FHWA, 2003.
23.
ThompsonT. D., BurrisM. W., and CarlsonP. J.. Speed Changes Due to Transverse Rumble Strips on Approaches to High-Speed Stop-Controlled Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1973, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1–9.
24.
HarderK. A., BloomfieldJ. R., and ChihakB.. The Effects of In-Lane Rumble Strips on the Stopping Behavior of Alert Drivers. Human Factors Research Report No. MN/RC-2002-11. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2001.
25.
HarderK. A., BloomfieldJ. R., and ChihakB. J.. Stopping Behavior at Real-World Stop-Controlled Intersections With and Without In-Line Rumble Strips. Publication MN/RC-2006-42. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2006.
26.
MilesJ. D., PrattM. P., and CarlsonP. J.. Evaluation of Erratic Maneuvers Associated with Installation of Rumble Strips. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1973, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 73–79.
27.
WangM. H., SchrockS. D., BornheimerC., and RescotR.. Effects of Innovative Portable Plastic Rumble Strips at Flagger-Controlled Temporary Maintenance Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 2, 2013, pp. 156–164.
28.
PerkinsD. D., and BowmanB. L.. Effectiveness Evaluation by Using Nonaccident Measures of Effectiveness. In Transportation Research Record 905, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 138–142.
29.
ZhouH., ZhaoJ., Pour-RouholaminM., and TobiasP.. Statistical Characteristics of Wrong-Way Driving Crashes on Illinois Freeways. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2015, pp. 760–767.
